Brisbane Flight Path Community Alliance

Brisbane Flight Path Community Alliance Brisbane Flight Path Community Alliance (BFPCA): People before planes

A huge THANK YOU to everyone who joined BFPCA and community groups from across South East Queensland at today’s Save Our...
23/08/2026

A huge THANK YOU to everyone who joined BFPCA and community groups from across South East Queensland at today’s Save Our Legacy - Community Rally. 💙✈️✊

Today demonstrated that communities fighting for very different things can stand together without giving up their individual causes.

TL;DR from BFPCA’s speech: Six years ago, we thought we were fighting aircraft noise. What we have learnt since is that aircraft noise is a symptom of something much deeper – failures of governance, regulatory and state capture, engagement theatre, and systems in which powerful interests can exercise far greater influence than the communities living with the consequences.

And these problems are not unique to aviation.

A flight path can shift and affect a new suburb. A forest considered protected today can become tomorrow’s development opportunity. Public land can suddenly acquire enormous commercial value. The fight that seems unrelated to you today could arrive in your community tomorrow.

That is why solidarity matters.

When one community raises concerns, it can be dismissed as another isolated local dispute. But when communities fighting completely different battles begin describing the same patterns of power, influence, failed consultation and disregard for community voice, a much bigger picture emerges.

Different communities. Different issues. Same pattern.

Together, we make that pattern visible – and together, we are much harder to ignore.

Thank you to the organisers, volunteers, speakers and everyone who showed up today to make their voices heard.

👇 Below is BFPCA’s speech from today, together with some photos from the rally.

✈️ PEOPLE BEFORE PLANES.

Good morning everyone.
Thank you Gaja Kerry for the beautiful Welcome. I add my respects to Elders past and present. And I thank the organisers for bringing us together. I’m here from BFPCA – Brisbane Flight Path Community Alliance. But in my day job, I’m a professor at QUT, so I’m very used to standing in front of students and giving 2 – 3 hour lectures off the cuff. Today they’ve given me 5 min — so, for everyone’s safety, I’ve written it down.

And thank you all for being here — and for successfully navigating the temporary fencing at King George Square to find us this morning. I suspect quite a few people here have become unexpectedly experts at navigating temporary fencing lately.
But before I go on, I want you to do something this morning. Talk to the person standing next to you — especially if they’re carrying a sign for a different campaign. Ask them what they’re fighting for. And ask them what happened when they tried to get government to listen.

I suspect you’ll discover very quickly why we’re all standing here together today. We’re fighting for parks. For forests. For koalas. For public land. For cultural heritage. For our neighbourhoods. And, in our case, for communities subjected to relentless aircraft noise.

On the surface, these look like completely different fights. They’re not. Because sooner or later, we start asking the same questions:

• Who actually makes the decisions?
• Who gets listened to?
• Who gets the benefits?
• And who is forced to carry the costs?

When BFPCA started six years ago, we thought we were fighting aircraft noise. We were wrong.

Aircraft noise was what woke us up — sometimes quite literally at 3 am in the morning. But the deeper we dug, the more we realised that noise was a symptom. We dug deeper, and we found a system in which industry, corporations, regulators, government agencies and political decision-makers have become extraordinarily intertwined.

What we ALL are dealing with has a name: State capture. That’s what happens when powerful private interests become so deeply embedded in the institutions and networks of government that public decisions increasingly serve those vested interests instead of the public. It’s not just lobbying. It’s not just paying money to get a meeting with a Minister. It’s when the people who are supposed to regulate powerful interests become entangled with the very interests they’re supposed to regulate.

And one of the ways communities experience that is through: Engagement theatre. That’s when institutions invite us to workshops, surveys, submissions and consultations — giving us the appearance of participation — while the decisions that really matter have already been made. Because those powerful vested interests have gotten to the decision-makers first.

BFPCA has experienced six years of it. And I suspect quite a few people here recognise it too. We’re now seeing consultation on the Victoria Park Master Plan while we have already watched trees coming down.

This learning journey has changed what BFPCA fights for. Airservices Australia is a government-owned corporation, but its operating model is funded by — and deeply embedded in — the aviation industry it serves. Today, we’re launching a national campaign calling for Airservices to be brought back under direct public control and direct democratic accountability. Why? Because eventually you realise that you cannot solve a structural problem by endlessly treating its symptoms.

And if you think this is only aviation’s problem, consider what’s happening with Brisbane 2032.

Different industry. Different issue. Disturbingly familiar governance model.

Government creates an arm’s-length authority — GIICA — gives it extraordinary powers to deliver Games infrastructure, suspends 15 pieces of state legislation that Parliament created to protect us, limits avenues for review or dissent, and even vests public land in that authority so it can get on with delivering the stadium. Think about what that means.

State capture doesn’t always look like somebody handing a politician a brown paper bag. It is much more sophisticated than that. Corporate, industry and government interests become so closely aligned that the institutional machinery of the state itself is redesigned to facilitate a particular outcome. And then we are told that outcome represents the legacy in the public interest.
Yet communities are watching governments prepare to bulldoze a legacy in order to build one.

• Bulldoze mature trees and habitat.
• Bulldoze cultural and ecological values.
• Bulldoze established protections.
• Bulldoze community consultation when communities give the wrong answer.

You cannot bulldoze the things we inherited and call what replaces them a legacy. A legacy is what we leave to the people who come after us — not what we destroy before they get here.
Why should we care about fights that aren’t ours? Because: None of us knows where the next fight will appear. Flight paths shift — and suddenly another street, another neighbourhood, another suburb discovers what aircraft noise actually means. A forest that seems protected today can appear on a developer’s roadmap tomorrow. Koala habitat that seems safe today can become earmarked for urban sprawl and expansion. Public land that generations assumed belonged to the community can suddenly acquire enormous commercial value.

The fact that they haven’t come for something you love yet doesn’t mean they won’t. That’s why protecting somebody else’s legacy today helps protect yours tomorrow.

And that brings me to the most important lesson we’ve learnt. Powerful interests already understand collective strength. They build networks. They share intelligence. They cultivate relationships. They amplify one another. They work across organisations and across governments. Meanwhile, communities are encouraged to stay in our little boxes. That fragmentation is their advantage.

Because: when one community says something is wrong, it can be dismissed as another local dispute. But when communities across South East Queensland — fighting completely different battles — start describing the same patterns of power, influence, failed consultation and disregard for community voice… We become evidence.

Together, we make the pattern visible.

The powerful have understood collective strength for a very long time.

It’s time communities did too.

• So let’s fight to protect our parks.
• Protect our forests.
• Protect our wildlife.
• Protect our neighbourhoods.
• And we’ll keep fighting for the communities under Brisbane’s flight paths.

But when they come for somebody else’s legacy — show up. As you did today.

Because next time, it could be yours.
Thank you.

End the Failed Airservices Australia Corporate ModelFor too long, communities have been told that aircraft noise is some...
22/08/2026

End the Failed Airservices Australia Corporate Model

For too long, communities have been told that aircraft noise is something we simply have to learn to live with, while chronic air traffic control shortages, failed flight path designs and broken consultation processes are met with yet another review, another promise and another delay.

At the heart of the problem is a system built around the aviation industry profits rather than the people living underneath flight paths or even the industry’s own customers.

Airservices may be government-owned, but it operates as a corporatised entity funded by the aviation industry. The people who pay the price for its decisions – communities on the ground – have no equivalent power.

It is time to put people before planes and bring Airservices back under direct public-service control.

Ending the corporatised model would change who ultimately carries responsibility. Instead of an arm’s-length board being expected to balance operational efficiency, industry demands and community impacts, the Australian Government would be directly accountable for ensuring our air traffic system is properly staffed, adequately funded and designed to protect communities both in the air and on the ground.

We have spent years asking Airservices to listen. We have participated in consultations, lodged complaints, attended forums, made submissions and watched inquiry after inquiry confirm what communities already knew. The problem is no longer a lack of evidence.

The problem is the model itself. Australia should not have to wait for an aviation tragedy, another disastrous flight path rollout or thousands more families to have their lives disrupted before acting.

Join BFPCA in calling on the Federal Government to end the corporatised Airservices model and restore these essential national services to direct public control.

Enough tinkering around the edges. It is time for structural change.

Link in the first comment below. Post "done" when done and tag a friend or neighbour to keep this going.

19/08/2026

Residents will march through the CBD to protest the Queensland Government’s handling of environmental areas across the south-east region this Sunday.

Colleen Niland, a spokesperson from rally organiser Save Our Legacy, said: “The goal is to show our decision-makers we can see a SEQ region-wide pattern that is disenfranchising us and our children environmentally, economically and politically.”

Save Our Legacy, a group advocating for environment and liveability within the region, will rally alongside multiple community groups including Save Victoria Park, Brisbane Flight Path Community Alliance and Games WatchDog2032.

Ms Niland said the march will go from King George Square to Queens Park to protest a number of issues, such as “the destruction of valuable greenspace for development across our region including in and near to protected areas”.

The community groups are calling on local residents and families to march with them on Sunday, when Murray Watt - Senator for Queensland, Federal Minister for Environment and Water, is expected to be in Brisbane.

Read more online at https://village-voice.com.au/communities-rally-for-victoria-park-we-need-to-stand-together/

📣 ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. COMMUNITIES DESERVE A REAL SAY.What does aircraft noise have in common with communities fighting to ...
10/08/2026

📣 ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. COMMUNITIES DESERVE A REAL SAY.

What does aircraft noise have in common with communities fighting to protect public land, wildlife, heritage, neighbourhoods and community amenity?

Different communities. Different issues. Same broken system.

Across Brisbane and South East Queensland, community groups are discovering remarkably similar patterns.

We participate.
We make submissions.
We attend consultations.
We provide evidence.
We engage in good faith.

And then we’re ignored.

Decisions affecting our homes, communities and quality of life are too often made with little meaningful community influence, while powerful institutional and commercial interests seem to have a far greater say.

Brisbane’s aircraft noise crisis is our fight – but being heard is everyone’s fight.

That’s why Brisbane Flight Path Community Alliance (BFPCA) is joining other South East Queensland communities for the Save Our Legacy - Community Rally:

📅 Sunday 23 August 2026
⏰ 11am – 1pm
📍 King George Square → Queens Park

✊ We want Brisbane’s aircraft-noise-affected communities to turn out in force.

After six years of advocacy – and following the deeply disappointing outcomes of Airservices Australia’s Package 3 process – this is an opportunity to turn frustration into peaceful, visible community action.

Come along, find the BFPCA contingent and stand with us.

💙 Bring your BFPCA posters, yard signs, caps and T-shirts.
💙 Bring your family, neighbours and friends.
💙 Help us make Brisbane’s aircraft noise problem visible.

This is a peaceful, family-friendly rally and everyone is welcome.

This is not a BFPCA-organised event, and BFPCA’s participation does not mean we endorse the individual positions of every group attending.

We are joining and supporting Save Our Legacy - Community Rally: bringing together South East Queensland communities to protect the legacies that make our region liveable; helping connect people, share ideas and amplify local campaigns – because protecting one legacy helps protect them all.

AIRCRAFT NOISE IS OUR FIGHT.
BEING HEARD IS EVERYONE’S FIGHT.

✈️ PEOPLE BEFORE PLANES

👉 Please SHARE this post and invite your friends, family and neighbours. The bigger the turnout, the louder the message. Tag them below.

📣 AIRSERVICES RESPONDED. THEIR ANSWERS RAISE EVEN MORE QUESTIONS.After Village Voice Brisbane reported in their June 202...
12/07/2026

📣 AIRSERVICES RESPONDED. THEIR ANSWERS RAISE EVEN MORE QUESTIONS.

After Village Voice Brisbane reported in their June 2026 issue on serious gaps in the noise modelling and oversight behind Brisbane Airport’s 2026 Master Plan, Airservices challenged aspects of the reporting.

We applaud journalist Rob Mellett for going back to the facts. His follow-up is well worth reading. 👇

It raises a simple question: who is actually protecting communities from the impacts of aviation growth?

Thank you to Rob and Village Voice Brisbane for continuing to ask the questions our aviation regulators and government would rather avoid. 👏 💙

Brisbane Airport’s “noise plan” prepares city for two airports in one locationBFPCA Media Release, 10 July 2026KEY POINT...
10/07/2026

Brisbane Airport’s “noise plan” prepares city for two airports in one location

BFPCA Media Release, 10 July 2026

KEY POINTS:
BFPCA warns Airservices Noise Action Plan is not just a failure for current flight-path communities, but a warning to all of Greater Brisbane: Brisbane Airport is being prepared for Independent Parallel Runway Operations, effectively enabling two runways to operate independently in one location.

Airservices’ claim that 140,000 residents will be “spared” aircraft noise is misleading: it is based on modelled population counts inside narrow flight-path corridors, not actual noise exposure, flight frequency, sleep disturbance, or health impacts.

The only immediate changes are limited arrival-path adjustments: many headline benefits are future options, rejected proposals, or modelling artefacts – not real relief being delivered now.

Aviation consultancy Trax International identified 49 possible improvement opportunities in 2022, yet four years later Airservices list only four actions as implemented, with many others not progressed, still under review, deferred, or reduced to process language.

Airservices Noise Action Plan Package 3 delivers no curfew, no cap, no guaranteed over-water operations, no enforceable noise limits, and no health-based reduction in aircraft noise harm.

MEDIA STATEMENT:
Brisbane Flight Path Community Alliance (BFPCA) has warned that Airservices Australia’s Package 3 announcement is not merely a disappointing result for existing flight-path communities, but a stark warning to all of Greater Brisbane.

Airservices is presenting Package 3 of the Noise Action Plan for Brisbane as aircraft noise relief, while the deeper structural outcome is preparing Brisbane Airport for Independent Parallel Runway Operations (IPRO) from around 2027.

IPRO will allow aircraft to land simultaneously and independently on both runways. BFPCA says this effectively moves Brisbane Airport towards operating as “two airports in one location”, increasing runway throughput, supporting airport and airline growth aspirations, and expanding the risk that aircraft noise will spread further across Greater Brisbane over time.

Today’s heavily affected suburbs are the early warning system for the rest of the city. Once the airspace architecture is set up for higher throughput, pressure for more flights will grow, and communities not currently engaged in the aircraft noise debate may find themselves affected in future.

Airservices has claimed that Package 3 will spare 140,000 residents from aircraft noise. BFPCA says this is a misleading headline figure because Airservices’ own methodology counts estimated population within a narrow 2 km flight-path corridor – 1 km either side of a notional centreline – rather than measuring real-world noise burden, flight frequency, sleep disturbance or health impacts.

This means one person exposed to 100 flights a day is counted as one person, while 100 people exposed to one flight each are counted as 100 people. The metric does not capture flight frequency, aircraft type, altitude, night-time disturbance, cumulative exposure from arrivals and departures, or health impacts.

The only changes going live immediately are limited over-land arrival-path adjustments. Many of the claimed benefits are future options, rejected proposals, or modelling artefacts. The announcement does not deliver a curfew, a cap, guaranteed over-water operations, enforceable noise limits, or a health-based reduction in aircraft noise harm.

By contrast, as part of Minister Catherine King’s approval of Melbourne Airport’s third runway, Melbourne Airport is required to undertake an independent long-term Community Health Study into the impacts of aircraft noise. That study will collect baseline data before third runway operations begin and continue annual monitoring for 20 years. If health-based aircraft noise assessment can be required in Melbourne, it should be done in Brisbane, too.

The Package 3 outcome also needs to be judged against the 2022 Trax International review. Airservices spent more than half a million dollars on Trax who identified 49 potential improvement opportunities for Airservices to investigate. Four years later, Airservices’ Package 3 material lists only four Package 3 actions as implemented, while many others are not progressing, remain under review, are deferred to future implementation, or have been absorbed into process and design-principle language.

BFPCA also noted that during the Senate Inquiry into aircraft noise, Airservices Deputy CEO Peter Curran stated that Airservices would do “as little as possible” – a statement recorded in Hansard (page 51) from the Canberra hearing on 20 September 2024. BFPCA says Package 3 shows Airservices has delivered on that promise.

BFPCA says Greater Brisbane now deserves a serious public debate about whether unrestricted 24/7 airport growth is compatible with a liveable city, and whether Brisbane residents should continue to be denied the same protections afforded to communities around airports in Sydney, Adelaide, Essendon and the Gold Coast.

QUOTES ATTRIBUTABLE TO BFPCA CHAIRPERSON PROF. MARCUS FOTH:
“Package 3 is not just a disappointing outcome for today’s flight-path communities. It is a warning to all of Greater Brisbane.”

“Airservices is dressing this up as noise relief, but the real story is capacity. Brisbane Airport is being prepared to operate like two airports in one location.”

“Once Independent Parallel Runway Operations are enabled, Brisbane Airport will have the airspace architecture it needs for simultaneous independent landings on both runways. That is an airport and airline growth measure being sold to the public as community relief.”

“The claim that 140,000 residents will be spared aircraft noise is marketing spin. Airservices is counting people inside a modelled corridor, not measuring actual aircraft noise, sleep disturbance, frequency of overflights, or cumulative health harm.”

“Melbourne gets a 20-year independent health study. Brisbane gets a spreadsheet.”

“Trax identified 49 possible improvement opportunities in 2022. Four years later, Airservices’ own Package 3 outcomes show only four Package 3 actions implemented, with many others not progressed, still under review, or pushed into future work. That is not a comprehensive noise fix.”

“Airservices promised to do ‘as little as possible’, and that is exactly what Brisbane communities have received: no curfew, no cap, no guaranteed over-water operations, no enforceable noise targets, and no health-based reduction in aircraft noise harm.”

17/06/2026

Federal transport bureaucrats admit a newly approved 20-year master plan for Brisbane Airport will lock in aircraft noise contours based on legacy flight paths, omitting ongoing trials designed to protect residential areas.

During a Senate estimates exchange, Shadow Minister for Infrastructure and Transport Bridget McKenzie Bridget McKenzie, grilled Sarah Nattey, Assistant Secretary of the Department of Infrastructure’s Airports Branch, over why a preliminary draft of the blueprint ignored current noise-sharing investigations.

The admission means Federal Transport Minister Catherine King has just signed off on a two-decade aviation roadmap without factoring in critical trials aimed at directing more flights over Moreton Bay.

Photo: a Brisbane Flight Path Community Alliance protest

Read more online at https://village-voice.com.au/brisbane-airport-master-plan-relies-on-legacy-noise-limits/

16/06/2026

BAC Master Plan approved by Minister King

BFPCA is extremely disappointed by Minister King’s decision to approve the Brisbane Airport Master Plan.

More than 500 Brisbane residents individually wrote to the Minister asking her to refuse the Master Plan because it locks in thousands of flights a day over people and entrenches the aircraft noise impacts that communities have been experiencing since 2020. The Minister has ignored those concerns and approved the Plan regardless.

What is particularly concerning is that the Minister’s own media release acknowledges that the current Aircraft Noise Exposure Forecast (ANEF) in the Master Plan does not account for potential future flight path changes being considered under the Noise Action Plan for Brisbane. That’s precisely the purpose of a Master Plan: reliable future forecasts. BAC failed on this account, yet the Minister approved the Master Plan despite knowing the data cannot be relied upon.

In other words, the Minister has approved a 20-year Master Plan while simultaneously acknowledging that the airport’s future noise impacts may change as a result of decisions that have not yet been made and are not reflected in the approved Plan.

Over the past four months BFPCA wrote twice to the Minister seeking clarification on a series of procedural questions concerning environmental assessment, Airservices Australia’s own assessment processes, the relationship to the 2007 environmental approvals, and how future flight path changes would be reflected in the noise forecasts. Those questions were never substantively answered before approval was granted.

The approval confirms what Brisbane communities have increasingly concluded: the current regulatory system prioritises airport growth and aviation industry interests, while communities are expected to simply accept the resulting aircraft noise impacts.

BFPCA will continue advocating for genuine noise reduction, greater use of over-water operations, a Brisbane Airport curfew, movement caps, stronger independent oversight, and implementation of the recommendations of the Senate Inquiry into aircraft noise.

24/05/2026

Does aircraft noise affect you? Comment below 🛬

Aircraft noise from Brisbane airport operations afflicts over one million Brisbane residents during the daytime, and about two hundred thousand at night.

Retired Brisbane GP Dr Karin Hage and Brisbane environmental scientist Dr Sean Foley write that Brisbane airport’s aviation operations are a health risk for most Brisbane residents.

"Global scientific evidence shows long-term exposure to aircraft noise negatively affects both physical and mental health. The UN World Health Organization and European Union recognise aircraft noise as a major public health risk."

Read the full article at https://village-voice.com.au/aircraft-noise-why-it-can-harm-your-health/

08/05/2026

A night curfew on flights departing and landing at Brisbane Airport would produce considerable economic benefits, including a significant reduction in adverse health impacts from aircraft noise.

This from a comprehensive report The Economic Case for a Curfew at Brisbane Airport by University of Queensland Economics Professor John Quiggin, which he presented to the town hall meeting organised by the Brisbane Flight Path Community Alliance (BFPCA) on February 15.

He pointed out that the public costs of continued 24-hour operations are borne daily, in the form of fragmented sleep, elevated health risks, declining neighbourhood amenity, and deepening social inequity.

Read more about the research findings on our news site at https://village-voice.com.au/economic-and-health-benefits-from-a-brisbane-airport-night-curfew/

Address

PO Box 2031
New Farm, QLD
4005

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Brisbane Flight Path Community Alliance posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Organization

Send a message to Brisbane Flight Path Community Alliance:

Shortcuts

Share