06/09/2026
So…maybe another year of breathing space for the forests of the proposed GKNP.
In Budget Estimates on 1 Sept, NSW Minister for Agriculture Tara Moriarty indicated that a 12-month moratorium placed one year ago and due to expire at midnight on 8 Sept 2026 will be extended for 12 months.
Moriarty also said, “…we’re hoping to get the park established as soon as possible and to deal with the things that we need to do to get the park established in this term of government. There are only six sitting weeks left and there are things stuck in Federal Parliament.”
Those “things” are being held up for many reasons…including pre-election posturing.
So please help the Senators out. There is still time to write to Senators before 15 September.
To be clear…if the INFM carbon method is attached to the GKNP, 100 years of “permanence” does NOT mean 100 years of watertight legal protection (from logging, clearing or other permitted activities) for every forest and every hectare within the GKNP.
The 100 years relates to the 100-year permanence requirement applying to the INFM project and its credited abatement. Permanence means the length of time that carbon removed from the atmosphere is expected to remain stored and prevented from being released back into the atmosphere. It does NOT mean 100 years of guaranteed ACCU income, nor does it necessarily mean 100 years of legal conservation protection.
Several factors could affect the GKNP’s eligibility under the INFM method and its implementation. These include:
•Which forests will actually qualify as carbon protection areas?
•How much forest remains outside the carbon protection areas and remains subject to harvesting under the project's management arrangements?
•The GKNP INFM only includes a 15-year ACCU crediting period.
•What happens to logging outside carbon protection areas after the 15-year crediting period, subject to the INFM project's 100-year permanence requirements?
•Baseline and FullCAM modelling assumptions such as baseline land-use history, rainfall, forest carbon growth and carbon-stock assumptions, and disturbance/fire regimes, which could reduce modelled abatement and affect GKNP eligibility under the INFM.
•Over 10,000 hectares of land within the proposed GKNP have been industrially logged in recent years and over 5,000 hectares of land within the proposed GKNP has been extensively depleted by mega-fire damage.
•Bell Miner Associated Dieback (BMAD) and other problems have been caused by past industrial logging and resultant broken canopies
•The amount of carbon actually credited
•Leakage (moving logging to another area) and negative-abatement adjustments
•ACCU prices and future carbon-market demand. Estimates of potential GKNP carbon revenue vary widely – please read the article in comments for further details
•Changes to legislation, regulations or carbon methodologies
•Compliance with project requirements and management plans
•Fire, drought, flood, disease and other possible disturbances
•The current INFM methodology itself has an expiry date of 30 September 2036. From that date, no new projects can be registered under this particular methodology. A replacement or alternative carbon methodology could potentially be proposed and developed before or after that date.
The INFM is a carbon-accounting mechanism - it is NOT the same thing as declaring the forests a national park.
“100-year carbon permanence” should not be confused with “100 years of guaranteed forest protection.”
For the GKNP forests to be protected for generations, the strongest security remains durable legal protection of the forests themselves.
🌳The most effective way to protect the forests of the GKNP and other habitat forests of NSW is to declare an end to native forest logging and to declare public native forests as national parks and other protected areas.🌳
Another year could make all the difference.