29/06/2026
WESTERN RENEWABLES LINK - IMPACT ON ROADS & BRIDGES IN NORTHERN GRAMPIANS
The Victorian Minister for Planning is sitting on the EES Report for Western Renewables Link. This Report needs to be released before the State election so we know the decision. It will directly affect the outcome in the seat of Lowan (Emma Keally NATS) and the highly margin seat of Ripon (Martha Haylett MP LABOR).
AusNet is seeking a permit for a Construction Transport Route that impacts five local roads in the Northern Grampians Shire:
Curries Lane
Joel Joel Road
Joel South Road
Shays Flat Road
Vances Crossing Road
During the Western Renewables Link Inquiry, AusNet rejected or dismissed most of the concerns raised by the Councils, including the Northern Grampians Shire.
The Northern Grampians Council has found itself at the centre of Victoria's two largest electricity transmission projects: Western Renewables Link (WRL) and VNI West. The Council told the Inquiry that “in the face of the scale of this change, we were expecting genuine engagement” but “instead the proponent’s and the State’s disregard for NGSC’s interests has become increasingly apparent throughout the Inquiry”.
The scale of energy development already occurring within the Shire is huge. Western Renewables Link includes 13 kilometres of new 500 kV transmission line running from the existing Bulgana Terminal Station parallel to the existing 220 kV transmission line between Bulgana and Waubra. In addition, there are 12 renewable energy projects within NGSC that are already operating or planned, including the Joel Joel Battery Energy Storage System and the Watta Wella Wind Farm and Battery.
The Council told the WRL Inquiry:
“Our concerns are informed by direct experience with other energy projects constructed within our Shire. In those projects, inadequate planning for road impacts resulted in serious and costly consequences. Despite having a traffic management plan in place - residents in the vicinity of unsealed construction routes experienced contamination of their drinking water supplies, with dust stirred up by heavy vehicles settling in rainwater tanks to such an extent that the water could no longer be used for drinking or laundry.
Elsewhere, sealed roads deteriorated rapidly due to the intensity of construction traffic, eventually becoming unsafe or unusable for the community. Culverts were damaged, in some cases leaving large holes that created hazards for road users. In another instance, the condition of existing bridges had not been properly documented, leading the contractor to undertake strengthening works that were inadequate.
Traffic behaviour during these projects further exacerbated risks to the community. Council staff and residents observed construction vehicles failing to comply with traffic management measures, including ignoring stop signs and failing to adhere to red light signals at temporary roadworks. There were reports of trucks travelling down the centre of narrow rural roads and forcing other vehicles off the carriageway.
In other cases, contractors used roads that were not part of the approved traffic management plan. Unsealed roads were often insufficiently graded, leaving them in a condition that could not be safely used by standard two-wheel-drive vehicles. Although contractors acknowledged many of these issues and attempted corrective actions, the same problems occurred repeatedly throughout construction, demonstrating that the mitigation measures employed were inadequate and that underlying risks had not been appropriately addressed.
From this experience it is clear that the road network in our Shire is highly vulnerable to the pressures generated by large infrastructure projects, many of which are underway due to the energy transition. Mitigating measures applied during construction have proven ineffective, and once damage occurs, the cost to rectify it is disproportionately borne by the community and our council. When multiple major projects operate concurrently or sequentially within the same area, as is increasingly the case in Northern Grampians, it becomes almost impossible to attribute damage to any one proponent. In the case of the WRL project, the EES traffic assessment fails to address these realities.”
These are not just hypothetical concerns: contaminated drinking water, dangerous roads and costs for damage left with the ratepayer.