Sue Neill-Fraser Support Group

Call Directions Website Contact the organization

Sue Neill-Fraser Support Group To raise awareness of the Sue Neill-Fraser case. Find us on Instagram at
Find us on Twitter as

If you want a great recap on Sue's case, the Undercurrent TV series is now back online on 7+ Check it out!
17/10/2026

If you want a great recap on Sue's case, the Undercurrent TV series is now back online on 7+ Check it out!

Watch, Stream & Catch Up with your favourite Undercurrent: Real Murder Investigation episodes on 7plus. An investigation of Sue Neill-Fraser, who was charged with the murder of her partner after he mysteriously disappeared.

14/10/2026

This Sunday 18 October 2026, tune in to 60 Minutes on Channel 9!

Another great article today.
26/09/2026

Another great article today.

Tasmania’s Parole Board used a document citing legal authorities that do not exist to stop Susan Neill-Fraser proclaiming her innocence

We are loving the title of today's letter page in the Mercury and what a great letter from Hugh Selby - thanks Hugh!
18/09/2026

We are loving the title of today's letter page in the Mercury and what a great letter from Hugh Selby - thanks Hugh!

17/09/2026

Thank you Senator Jacqui Lambie for once again raising Sue's case in Federal Parliament. Here is the relevant section of Hansard:

Wednesday, 16 September 2026 SENATE
Neill-Fraser, Ms Susan Blyth (Sue)
Senator LAMBIE (Tasmania) (13:52): Sue Neill-Fraser was found guilty of murdering her partner, Bob Chappell, aboard their yacht in Hobart in 2009. Ms Neill-Fraser has always protested her innocence and no body has ever been found, and no murder weapon either. But she was convicted and sentenced to 26 years in prison. Sue
was released on parole in 2022, thank God, but, when in late 2024 she was approached by 60 Minutes, Ms NeillFraser did the right thing and advised the Parole Board of Tasmania about a possible upcoming story. The Parole Board added a condition that she not speak 'directly or indirectly with any media outlet to claim her alleged innocence or wrongful conviction'. But then, in May 2025, they made the condition even more restrictive, which
meant she couldn't even talk about her case with her family, her friends and her supporters.
Yesterday, in the Supreme Court in Hobart, Justice Stephen Estcourt ruled the condition was invalid because it
denied Sue Neill-Fraser procedural fairness, was legally unreasonable and created uncertainty. But, wait, that's not
the shocking part. Neill-Fraser's barrister, Patrick Coleridge, told the court the Parole Board secretary used artificial
intelligence to prepare a rationale justifying the parole condition, citing case law that was fictitious and likely AI
hallucinations. Sarah Schwartz from the Human Rights Law Centre said yesterday:
It's really concerning that the Parole Board of Tasmania, a public authority, used AI in generating this document that so severely
has restricted our client's fundamental freedoms.
I hope the Human Rights Law Centre and others will be watching the upcoming parliamentary inquiry into Tasmania
Police, because, let me tell you, there is a lot more to be concerned about

A great result in court today - long overdue!
15/09/2026

A great result in court today - long overdue!

Tasmania's parole board has failed in a bid to keep in place a ban on a convicted murderer speaking to the media because its argument in the Supreme Court cited case law that was "hallucinated" by AI.

25/08/2026

GREAT NEWS TODAY!

Media Release
Human Rights Law Centre | For immediate release: Tuesday 25 August 2026

Tasmanian Parole Board removes condition restricting Susan Neill-Fraser's speech
Following a legal challenge by the Human Rights Law Centre, the Tasmanian Parole Board has today removed a parole condition which sought to prevent Tasmanian grandmother, Susan Neill-Fraser, from speaking to third parties, including media, about her claimed innocence or wrongful conviction.

The Centre’s challenge, filed in April 2025 in the Tasmanian Supreme Court, argues that this condition preventing Susan from speaking to the media and third parties is unreasonable, improper and in breach of the constitutionally implied freedom of political communication.

The Human Rights Law Centre welcomes this decision, which restores Susan’s ability to exercise her rights to freedom of expression and participate in public debate.

Parole is intended to support people to reintegrate into the community after time spent in prison. The Human Rights Law Centre remains concerned by the largely unchecked powers of parole boards throughout the country which impose restrictive parole conditions that prevent people’s full participation in the community. Restrictive parole conditions have a disproportionate impact on already marginalised groups who are overrepresented in the criminal legal system.

The case will return to the Supreme Court of Tasmania on Monday 31 August at 10am.

Quotes attributable to Sarah Schwartz, Legal Director at the Human Rights Law Centre:

"This decision is an important vindication of Susan's rights, which we have fought to protect for more than a year. We welcome the decision of the Parole Board of Tasmania to remove this condition. Freedom of expression is a fundamental right, and we are pleased that Susan is no longer subject to a restriction that prevented her from being able to participate in public debate."

"The right to speak out and participate in public debate is foundational to a healthy democracy. People who have experienced incarceration are often among the most important voices in discussions about the criminal legal system and protecting their ability to speak out and advocate for change is an important safeguard against injustice."

"We are concerned by the largely unchecked powers of parole boards across the country to impose restrictive conditions that limit people's fundamental freedoms and full participation in the community. Parole is meant to be about supporting reintegration, not silencing people or excluding them from public debate.”

Background

Susan Neill-Fraser served 13 years in prison and has been on parole since 2022.

In December 2024, the Tasmanian Parole Board placed a condition on Susan’s parole which prohibited her from communicating “directly or indirectly with any media outlet to claim [her] alleged innocence and/or wrongful conviction”.

In May 2025, this condition was replaced with a condition which prohibits her from communicating “directly or indirectly – including through third parties, written statements, electronic communications, social media platforms, television, radio, podcasts, streaming services, online video-sharing platforms, or any other public or broadcast media – to assert claims regarding your alleged innocence, wrongful conviction, or dispute the legitimacy of your conviction or sentencing”.


Media contact:
Laura Murphy-Oates, 0435 836 664, [email protected]

25/03/2026

Thank you once again Mike Gaffney MLC
Adjournment Speech
The Hon Michael Gaffney (MLC)
Sue Neill Fraser Notice of Motion
24 March 2026
Thank you Mr President, I rise to inform Honourable Members and members of the
public interested in this case, the reason I have chosen to defer today’s notice of
motion debate calling for a Commission of Inquiry into the Sue Neill-Fraser murder
conviction.
I genuinely thank the Leader of Government Business and staff for facilitating an
opportunity for Members to be briefed last Wednesday on the 18th March 2026.
It was considered appropriate by the Sue Neill-Fraser support team that this would be a
closed session and conducted to enable frank and open discussion. Staff from the
Department of Justice were present with the agreement of those attending.
That briefing was followed by further closed briefings to Members from Tasmania Police
and the Office of the DPP, Director of Public Prosecutions.
Those briefings have provided new information for Members and, importantly, raised
further questions — particularly in relation to the disclosure by the Crown of material
that may have been relevant to the defence. Inquiries are now underway to determine
the full circumstances of those matters.
As Honourable Members we have only one opportunity in a term of government to move
a motion for a Commission of Inquiry into the Neill-Fraser case, I do not wish to press
the House to a decision at this time, before additional information can be sought and
obtained.
Mr President, this is a complex case, and it is an entirely circumstantial one – no body,
no weapon, and no motive.
I will bring on the notice of motion for debate in due course. We need to get this right.
The fight for justice will continue.
And it must.
Because Mr President justice demands nothing less.

Please come along to the Rally on Saturday and please share this post!
19/01/2026

Please come along to the Rally on Saturday and please share this post!

Address

Hobart, TAS

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Sue Neill-Fraser Support Group posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Organization

Send a message to Sue Neill-Fraser Support Group:

Shortcuts

Share