16/06/2026
How many women are missing from our femicide statistics?
When we talk about femicide, we usually think about homicide.
A woman killed by a current or former partner.
A life taken in a single act of violence.
But what about the women who spend years living under coercive control, threats, intimidation, isolation, financial abuse and psychological violence?
What about the women who die by su***de after enduring years of abuse?
Emerging research is challenging us to rethink what counts as femicide.
Some experts describe these deaths as "slow femicide", the cumulative impact of violence that gradually strips away safety, hope, health and wellbeing until death becomes the outcome.
Research from Victoria found that almost one in four people who died by su***de had experienced family violence.
In New South Wales, Domestic Violence Death Review data found that almost half of female su***des had a recorded or apparent history of domestic and family violence.
Yet most of these deaths are not counted in our domestic violence statistics.
They are not counted as femicide.
They are often not investigated through a domestic and family violence lens.
For Aboriginal women, these conversations are even more important.
The impacts of domestic and family violence do not occur in isolation. They intersect with intergenerational trauma, racism, poverty, housing insecurity, child removal concerns, barriers to culturally safe services and ongoing systemic disadvantage.
We cannot prevent what we refuse to see.
If violence contributes to a woman's death, whether through homicide or through years of coercive control that leaves her believing there is no way out, then we need to be asking harder questions.
Who gets counted?
Who gets overlooked?
And what would accountability look like if we recognised the full toll of violence against women?
The conversation about femicide must include the deaths we cannot always see.
Because every woman counts.