02/06/2026
๐๐๐ซ๐ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐๐ฆ๐ข๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐ญ๐จ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐จ๐ฒ๐๐ฅ ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐ฆ๐ข๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐จ๐ง ๐๐ง๐ญ๐ข๐ฌ๐๐ฆ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐ฌ๐ฆ. Link: https://tinyurl.com/3ubmpcjp
The submission is based upon an extensive study of local reporting and monitoring mechanisms. Reports such as those from the ECAJ or CSJ are variable in quality and can be politicised. The Exec summary covers the main issues. Key points.
1. Antisemitism is real and should be taken seriously.
2. Measurement is not the same as classification.
3. Not all reported incidents are equivalent.
4. Clear distinctions are needed between antisemitism and political speech.
5. Perceptions matter, but they are not the same as verified incidents.
6. Current monitoring systems need greater transparency.
7. Media and social media amplify perceptions of threat.
8. Antisemitism should be studied using the same methodological standards applied to other forms of racism.
9. A national collaborative monitoring framework is needed.
10. The public interest requires balancing protection from genuine antisemitism with protection of democratic freedoms, including free speech and legitimate political debate.