05/06/2026
Advocacy for Inclusion (AFI) has made a submission to the Senate Community Affairs Legislation Committee on the National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026, calling for the Bill not to proceed in its current form.
The Bill is not a minor integrity measure – it is a structural redesign of who can access the NDIS, how plans are funded, and how decisions are made and reviewed. The government’s own modelling confirms that hundreds of thousands of people with disability will be removed from or denied access to the scheme by 2031.
The government has framed the Bill largely around fraud and restoring the scheme’s social licence. That framing does not hold up against the government’s own figures. The projected savings come overwhelmingly from cutting supports for existing participants and tightening access – not from fraud measures. The public justification and the financial modelling are telling different stories.
Our central concern is sequencing. Participation support budgets are cut from October 2026. The functional capacity assessment framework that will determine future eligibility does not commence until January 2028. The Foundational Supports meant to replace what is cut are not yet designed, not yet funded in practice, and not yet operational. There is no jurisdiction in Australia where a ready, adequately staffed alternative will exist by the time cuts begin. Reducing NDIS funding does not reduce disability-related need. It shifts the cost onto individuals, families, carers, and already stretched public systems.
We are also concerned about a systemic risk that runs across multiple provisions: the combination of expanded automated decision-making, assessment thresholds set outside parliament through ministerial instruments, and weakened review and appeal mechanisms. Together, these create conditions where erroneous or systematically harsh outcomes could affect large numbers of people before problems become visible or correctable. The structural parallels with Robodebt are real.
For the people we work with every day, this is not abstract. These reforms go directly to whether someone can leave the house, keep their housing, go to work, and stay connected to their community. The people most likely to bear the cost are those with psychosocial disability, fluctuating or episodic conditions, and those without strong advocacy or informal support networks – the people already least well-served by complex administrative systems.
We have been raising these concerns at every stage of this reform process, and we will continue to do so. We urge the committee to recommend that the Bill not proceed until the serious risks identified – to access, individual rights, participant safety, and democratic oversight – have been meaningfully addressed through genuine co-design with people with disability.
The full submission is available: https://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=e2737f59-37c8-4b23-8054-12a07f2c026e&subId=791261
@
If you believe this is in error, please copy this code 20260605T031114Z-17f455cbfc6dpcmghC1DM1xem800000006z0000000000vp1 and contact us HERE