28/09/2026
๐ฟ PUBLISHED: From Community Forestry to Buffer Zone Community Forestry: A Systematic Review of Governance Shifts, Socio-ecological Outcomes and Policy Challenges in Nepal
How effective is Nepalโs transition from Community Forestry (CF) to Buffer Zone Community Forestry (BZCF) in balancing biodiversity conservation and local livelihoods?
Our latest review by Joshi et al. (2026) synthesises evidence from 80 studies published between 2000 and 2026, following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, to examine how Buffer Zone Community Forests (BZCFs) have influenced forest conditions, local livelihoods, and community institutions under Nepalโs federal governance system.
Their findings reveal a mixed and highly context-specific picture. BZCFs have contributed to improved canopy cover, reduced forest fragmentation, and better forest health in some areas, while these ecological improvements have not necessarily translated into greater biodiversity. Conservation-related activities, particularly tourism, have generated additional income for some communities, but benefits remain uneven, and restrictions on forest-product use continue to affect forest-dependent households.
The review also highlights important institutional challenges. The transition to BZCFs has reduced community autonomy in many contexts, with greater decision-making authority shifting towards protected-area authorities. Overlapping budgets, ambiguous responsibilities, and conflicting benefit-sharing arrangements have further increased transaction costs and weakened local legitimacy.
The study calls for greater policy coherence across federal, provincial and local levels, transparent and equitable benefit-sharing, and meaningful community participation in co-management to better reconcile conservation and development objectives.
๐ Read the full Open Access article here: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11842-026-09664-3