IKOSA

01/09/2026

Another 800 to 600 year old indigenous settlement discovered in Mpumalanga.

“Is that what I think it is?” The question rises over the sound of trowels rhythmically scraping away at parched soil. “...[W]e better call Tim to have a look.”

10/04/2026

Government Moves to Lock Out the Poor from Public Water Resources
https://www.ikosa.africa/news/press-releases/objection-to-proposed-waterworks-regulations/

08/03/2026

FIVE UNIQUE SESOTHO PHONETIC SYMBOLS

These symbols offer a compelling visual language for the unique phonetics of Sesotho.

The descriptions reflect the specific geometric alignments and the distinct auditory textures they represent.

Symbolic Breakdown

Symbol 1 (Q): A solid circular Q featuring a centered vertical exclamation mark. This design captures the sharp, percussive nature of the post-alveolar click.

Symbol 2 (KG): A quarter moon tilted 90° clockwise (facing downward) with a single horizontal wavy line cutting through its center. It signifies the "scraping" sound of an object contacting a hard surface.

Symbol 3 (TL): A vertical solid line struck at its center by a single arrowhead from the left. This visualizes a lateral release, mimicking the sound of a sharp object striking a hard barrier.

Symbol 4 (TLH): A horizontal solid line struck at its center from below by an upward-pointing arrowhead. This represents the aspirated vertical force of a sharp object impacting a soft, wet surface.

Symbol 5 (HL): A large half-moon facing eastward, intersected at its top end by an upward-facing quarter moon. This complex form evokes the "hissing" or "searing" sound of grilled food, such as meat on a fire.

28/01/2026

📜⚖️ROYAL MEMORANDUM

To: Indigenous Kingdoms of South Africa, Traditional Leadership Institutions & Civil Movements

From:
Morena Nkokoto II, Paramount Head of Bahlakoana ba Nkokoto, Sovereign of the Royal House of Morake, Inheritor of the Legacies of the Royal Houses of Bahlakoana, Makgolokwe-a-Mafehleng, Batloung ba Sekhoane, Bataung ba Ramokhele, Phali wa Phuti, Mahlaba waka Cindi,

Re:
Constitutional Sovereignty, the Role of Political Parties, and the Operationalisation of Section 19(3)(b) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa

Date: 28 January 2026

1. PURPOSE OF THIS MEMORANDUM

This memorandum serves to provide a constitutional and royal opinion concerning:

a. The doctrine of sovereignty in South Africa

b. The constitutional status and role of political parties

c. The constitutional rights of citizens under Section 19

d. The structural failure to operationalise Section 19(3)(b)

e. The constitutional obligations of civil organisations

f. The legal implications for electoral legitimacy

*2. CONSTITUTIONAL SOURCE OF SOVEREIGNTY*

The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa establishes that sovereignty resides in the people, not in political parties, not in Parliament, not in government institutions, and not in electoral structures.

This is constitutionally grounded in:

Section 1(d), which affirms democratic governance based on the will of the people

Section 19, which codifies political rights as inherent to citizens, not organisations

Section 199(8), which confirms constitutional supremacy over all political authority

Section 236, which regulates political party funding, confirming parties as regulated participants, not sovereign authorities

The constitutional architecture therefore establishes pop**ar sovereignty, not party sovereignty.

3. CONSTITUTIONAL STATUS OF POLITICAL PARTIES

Political parties are constitutional facilitators, not constitutional sovereigns.

Their lawful role is limited to:

Facilitating proportional representation

Supporting democratic participation

Enabling political organisation

Contributing to oversight and accountability

They do not possess:

Original political authority

Sovereign mandate

Constitutional supremacy

Inherent governing legitimacy

Political parties exist to serve democracy, not to replace the people as the source of authority.

They are instruments of democratic function, not holders of sovereignty.

4. LEGAL EFFECT OF SECTION 19

Section 19 of the
Constitution establishes that political power flows from citizens as individuals, not from party structures.

Specifically, Section 19(3)(b) guarantees the right:
“to stand for public office and, if elected, to hold office.”

This right is personal, direct, and individual.

It is not contingent upon party membership.

It is not subordinate to party systems.

It is not conditional upon proportional representation frameworks.

Failure to give full operational effect to Section 19(3)(b) constitutes a constitutional deprivation of political rights.

5. STRUCTURAL FAILURE IN ELECTORAL IMPLEMENTATION

Although this constitutional principle has been affirmed through litigation, the state has failed to operationalise it in full.

The Electoral Act remains structurally designed to:

Preserve party dominance

Marginalise independent candidates (individual citizens)

Limit citizen sovereignty

Entrench party political monopolies

This represents legislative circumvention of constitutional intent, not constitutional compliance.

It is governance by administrative distortion rather than constitutional fidelity.

6. PRACTICAL CONSTITUTIONAL MODEL

In practical constitutional terms:

Where a municipality has 28 ward seats:

All 28 seats must be directly elected by residents

These office bearers must be Independent Candidates (Bonkgetheng)

Political parties may only occupy proportional representation seats

Proportional seats must always be fewer than directly elected citizen seats

This structure restores citizen sovereignty, preserves democratic legitimacy, and realigns governance with constitutional supremacy.

7. DUTY OF CIVIL ORGANISATIONS

Civil organisations possess a constitutional and moral duty to:

Educate citizens on their sovereignty

Defend political rights

Resist unconstitutional party dominance

Protect democratic legitimacy

Hold the state accountable to constitutional standards

Failure to act constitutes complicity in constitutional erosion.

8. ELECTORAL LEGITIMACY WARNING

Unless the Electoral Act is amended to give full operational effect to Section 19(3)(b):

Electoral processes lack constitutional legitimacy

Democratic consent is structurally compromised

Governance becomes procedurally legal but constitutionally defective

Elections become instruments of party preservation rather than expressions of pop**ar will

Under such conditions, electoral participation loses moral and constitutional legitimacy.

9. CONCLUSION

Political parties have no constitutional right to rule South Africa.

They have no sovereign authority.

They have no inherent governing mandate.

They are legally subordinate to the people.

Sovereignty belongs to the citizens of South Africa.

Governance legitimacy flows from the people.

Authority must return to the people.

Democracy must be restored to its constitutional foundation.

Author:
Morena Nkokoto II
Constitutional Royal Opinion and Civic Advisory Authority

10/01/2026

CONTINUITY BEYOND DEATH IN SESOTHO ONTOLOGY

Linguistic Logic, Water Cosmology, Naming, Ancestrality, and the Colonial Disruption of Basotho Life and Death

By Morena Nkokoto II

Abstract

This article presents a systematic exposition of Sesotho ontology as it relates to life, death, naming, water, land, and continuity of personhood among Sesotho speaking peoples, namely the Basotho, Batswana, Bachwana, and Bapedi.

It argues that death, as conceptualised in Western metaphysics, does not apply to human beings within the Basotho worldview. Humans are understood to awaken from deep sleep and depart bodily to Badimong.

Naming practices, clan identity, burial rites, and water based cosmology operate together as mechanisms of restoration and continuity rather than remembrance.

The article further demonstrates how colonisation, missionary theology, mortuary systems, cemetery burial, urbanisation, and land commoditisation fractured this coherent ontological system.

It contributes to indigenous knowledge scholarship by affirming Basotho ontology as a complete system of law, ethics, environmental governance, and metaphysics.

1. Introduction

Indigenous African cosmologies have long been reframed, diluted, or dismissed through colonial, missionary, and administrative epistemologies.

Among Sesotho speaking peoples, these interventions imposed foreign categories of religion, death, land ownership, and personhood that displaced an internally coherent ontological system governing continuity of life.

This article articulates the Basotho worldview as a unified system in which language, water, naming, burial, land, and ancestrality are inseparable.

It further argues that contemporary practices surrounding death and land do not represent cultural evolution but constitute epistemic and ontological violations.

2. Linguistic Logic and Ontological Method

Sesotho is not merely a communicative language but an ontological system. Meaning is produced through noun class prefixes that define being, relation, and category.

A person is MoSotho, a people are BaSotho, and the language and cultural system are SeSotho. When these prefixes are removed, meaning collapses into abstraction.

This linguistic structure reflects an ontological logic in which beings exist only in relation, never in isolation.

The same logic governs naming, burial, and ancestrality, forming the methodological foundation of this study.

3. Modimo as Water Based Cosmological Principle

Within ancient Sesotho belief systems, Modimo was not conceived as a transcendent sky deity.

Modimo is understood as a single invisible great water serpent residing in rivers, lakes, and deep waters. This being governs fertility, continuity, and cosmic balance.

Divine presence is therefore embedded within the ecological world. Water is not only a resource but a dwelling of cosmological authority. This conception predates and contradicts later missionary reinterpretations of Modimo as a monotheistic sky God.

4. Badimo as Pluralised Presence of Modimo

Following from Modimo as a single invisible great water serpent, Badimo is simply the plural form of Modimo. Linguistically and ontologically, Badimo refers to multiple manifestations or presences of the same cosmological principle.

Each clan, living separately from others, understood itself to be under the guardianship of its own Modimo and Badimo. These presences guided, protected, and sustained the clan, ensuring rain, peace, and abundance.

5. Water, Rain, and Territorial Continuity

Rain was the primary sign of the continued presence of Modimo and Badimo. The integrated triad of p**a, kgotso, and nala expressed ecological balance, social harmony, and material sufficiency.

A prolonged absence of rain signified more than drought. It indicated feminine imbalance, hunger, instability, and trouble.

Such conditions could necessitate relocation, as they were interpreted as evidence that Modimo and Badimo no longer resided in that territory. Presence was spatially anchored near water sources.

6. Sacred Time and Water Prohibitions

Because Modimo and Badimo were believed to dwell in the water, water sources were treated as sacred. Strict prohibitions governed their use.

No one was permitted to collect water, wash clothes, water livestock, or work in the fields during midday. Midday was regarded as the time when Modimo emerged from the water to bask in the sun.

These prohibitions constituted a form of indigenous environmental law rooted in reverence rather than regulation.

7. Birth Rituals and Seotlwana as Cosmological Interface

At the birth of a child, a reed was cut from the water source and erected on the seotlwana of the house where the child was born.

The seotlwana, a circular reed fence, with a lockable door in the centre, extending across the front of the house, functioned as a cosmological interface and a living space.

This act notified Modimo and Badimo of the arrival of new life and integrated the child into the territorial and ancestral order. Birth was therefore a cosmological event, not merely a biological one.

8. Cosmological Sanctions and Environmental Disturbance

Violations of sacred water prohibitions were believed to provoke cosmological disturbance. Hailstorms that destroyed crops were understood as consequences of disrespect toward Modimo and Badimo.

Environmental calamity was thus read as moral and relational imbalance rather than random natural occurrence.

9. Death as Awakening in Sesotho Ontology

In Sesotho ontology, death as annihilation applies only to plants and animals. Human beings do not die, they fall into deep sleep, and do wake up. What is externally perceived as death is understood as deep sleep.

Upon awakening with the first rising sun, the person proceeds bodily, carrying their implements and seeds, to Badimong. Continuity, not cessation, governs this transition.

10. Badimong and Ancestral Relational Order

Badimong is not a collective identity into which individuals dissolve. The person remains who they were in life and continues to be addressed relationally as bo Nkgono or bo Ntatemoholo.

Recent ancestors are referred to as Baholo, while ancient ancestors are known as Baholo holo. Ancestors are not themselves Badimo but exist within a broader relational cosmology governed by Badimo.

11. Naming, Restoration, and Living Personhood

Naming is a restorative ontological act. When a child is named after a person who has passed on, the purpose is to restore the name among the living.

The original bearer of the name is cordially approached through prayer and ritual and asked for consent. The person who carries the restored name assumes the same respect, status, and relational position as the original bearer.

This applies equally to marriage, where a woman entering a family may be bestowed with a revived ancestral name through ritual consent.

Disciplining a child who bears a restored name cannot proceed without first requesting permission. Even then, discipline must be carried out with reverence and restraint, never anger or curses.

Clan names operate under the same logic. They are sacred mechanisms for reviving foundational ancestors and sustaining continuity.

12. Funerary Practice and the Mechanics of Departure

Traditional burial practices were precisely structured to facilitate awakening and departure. The departed were seated underground in a crouching position before dawn and facing east.

When the first light of the sun rose, it struck the face of the departed, enabling them to stand and walk to Badimong.

Those who passed at home were concealed within the cattle kraal. Those who passed in the field were buried where they fell. Graves were unmarked.

The verbs used were pata and fihla, meaning to conceal, not dispose. Where death occurred away from home, the soul was ritually brought back through a fresh branch of a tree.

13. Colonial Disruption of Burial and Departure

Modern practices violate this ontological order. Storing the departed in mortuaries beyond the prescribed timeframe prevents awakening before the first sunrise.

Laying the body on its back and facing arbitrary directions obstructs departure. As a result, the soul is believed to remain trapped in the mortuary or place of death.

14. Land Commoditisation and
Ontological Rupture

Transporting the departed to cemeteries violates Basotho ontology. Cemeteries are colonial constructs rooted in land commoditisation.

Land within the Basotho worldview is a living relational space connecting the living, the departed, and the unborn. Commoditisation fractures this relationship and constitutes spatial violence.

15. Conclusion

Basotho ontology constitutes a complete system governing continuity of life, death, naming, water, and land. Colonial intervention fractured this system through theology, administration, and commoditisation.

Restoring dignity to the departed and coherence to Basotho life requires recognition of indigenous ontology as law, knowledge, and lived reality.

07/01/2026

RECONSIDERING ETHNONYMS, PREFIXATION, AND ANCESTRAL LANGUAGE IN SOUTHERN AFRICA:

A SESOTHO-CENTRED LINGUISTIC INQUIRY

By Morena Nkokoto II

Abstract

This article advances a linguistic and etymological argument concerning the improper use and later conflation of key Southern African ethnonyms, specifically Sotho, Pedi, Tswana, and Chwana.

Grounded in Sesotho linguistic logic, the paper examines the role of noun class prefixes in personhood, language designation, and abstraction, and proposes the existence of a largely forgotten ancestral language referred to here as Serwa.

The article further interrogates the semantic divergence between the roots tswa and chwa, the territorial meaning of Borwa, and the historical positioning of indigenous groups such as the Barwa and Bakgothu.

It concludes by questioning the exclusion of certain indigenous languages from the so-called Bantu language family and calls for a re-examination of Southern Africa’s deep linguistic history.

1. Introduction

Southern African ethnonyms have long been treated as self-evident categories, often detached from the grammatical and semantic rules of the languages from which they originate.

This has resulted in widespread misuse, abstraction, and conflation, particularly in colonial and postcolonial scholarship.

This article argues that such treatment obscures both linguistic precision and indigenous epistemologies.

Drawing primarily on Sesotho linguistic logic, this paper proposes that the terms Sotho, Pedi, Tswana, and Chwana are incomplete and improperly deployed when stripped of their correct noun class prefixes.

It further advances a hypothesis concerning an ancestral Southern African language, here referred to as Serwa, and situates this inquiry within broader debates on ethnogenesis, territorial naming, and linguistic classification.

2. Prefixation and Personhood in Sesotho

In Sesotho and related languages, meaning is not carried by roots alone but by the interaction between roots and noun class prefixes.

The prefix Mo- situates a root within the category of personhood, while Se- situates it within the category of language.

Without these prefixes, roots such as Sotho, Pedi, Tswana, or Chwana remain nominal or abstract, referring to states, conditions, or qualities rather than to people or speech communities.

The persistent use of these terms without their personalising or linguistic prefixes represents not a neutral shorthand but a grammatical and conceptual truncation.

Such usage strips the terms of their relational and human grounding, producing abstractions that are then mistaken for ethnographic facts.

3. Toward an Ancestral Language: Serwa, Barwa, and Borwa

An examination of Sesotho, Setswana, Sechwana, and Sepedi raises an unavoidable question, namely, of which older language these forms may be dialects.

This article proposes the name Serwa for that largely forgotten ancestral language, Barwa for the people who spoke it, and Borwa for the land they occupied, broadly corresponding to present-day Southern Africa.

Within Sesotho epistemology, Borwa denotes a territory rather than a direction. Directionality, such as south or north, requires astronomical reference, just as west and east are determined through the observable path of the Sun.

Borwa, by contrast, is spatial and territorial, not directional. This distinction suggests an indigenous spatial logic grounded in land rather than compass abstraction.

While this framing is explicitly Sesotho-centred, it invites comparative inquiry into other ancient Southern African languages, including languages such as Se-Khwe, to determine whether similar territorial rather than directional logics exist.

4. Tswa and Chwa: A Linguistic Divergence

Central to this discussion is the distinction between the terms Tswana and Chwana or Chuana, which are frequently treated as interchangeable.

Linguistically, however, they derive from different roots. Tswana is rooted in tswa, while Chwana or Chuana is rooted in chwa or chua.

These roots occupy distinct semantic fields and should not be conflated.

In both constructions, the suffix -na situates the term within an impersonal or nominal category, referring to a condition, quality, or state rather than a person.

The application of the prefix Mo- reclassifies the term into personhood.

When employed as ethnonyms, the semantic divergence is substantial.

The root tswa carries meanings associated with departure, defection, or betrayal, whereas chwa conveys likeness or similarity.

These are not minor phonetic variations but fundamentally different conceptual roots.

When used adjectivally or as suffixes, the meanings shift accordingly.

Tswana denotes smallness or diminutiveness, while chwana or tshwana denotes darkness, understood as depth or shade rather than the colour black itself.

5. Colonial Transcription and Linguistic Flattening

The distinctions outlined above are linguistically material rather than orthographic. They reflect different roots, meanings, and conceptual origins that were later collapsed through colonial transcription practices and administrative standardisation.

In the process, distinct linguistic identities were flattened into rigid ethnonyms, severed from their grammatical logic and historical depth.

This flattening has had lasting consequences for how Southern African peoples understand themselves and are understood by others, particularly within academic and state classifications.

6. The Barwa, the Bakgothu, and Linguistic Exclusion

This inquiry raises further historical questions.

Who were the Barwa, and who were the Bakgothu?

Have these indigenous groups been absorbed, and if so, by whom?

If they persist, under what names do they currently identify themselves?

It is also necessary to ask why Sesotho-speaking peoples referred to these groups as Ba-Rwa and Ba-Kgothu, and what relational or descriptive logic underpinned these designations.

Finally, this article questions why the languages of certain indigenous groups were excluded from what later came to be classified as the Bantu language family.

Such exclusion suggests that the category itself may be less a neutral linguistic taxonomy and more a historically contingent construct shaped by colonial epistemologies.

7. Conclusion

A linguistically grounded re-examination of Southern African ethnonyms reveals deep conceptual losses embedded in their modern usage.

By restoring attention to prefixation, root semantics, and territorial logic, this article argues for a reconsideration of Southern Africa’s linguistic past and the categories through which it has been narrated.

The proposal of Serwa, Barwa, and Borwa is not offered as a definitive reconstruction but as an invitation to deeper, cross-linguistic inquiry grounded in indigenous grammatical logic rather than imposed classification.

01/01/2026

WHEN A WORD REFUSES TO FORGET, THE BURDEN OF A NAME

By Morena Nkokoto II

There is a deep and persistent reluctance to confront the term itself, its origin, its semantic load, and the social psychology that sustains it.

This reluctance stems either from fear, or from an absence of rigorous analytical capacity to interrogate language as a carrier of historical memory, moral judgment, and collective experience.

Words are not neutral containers. They emerge from lived relations, conflict, choice, and consequence. To refuse to interrogate them is to surrender thought itself.

The term “Tswana” is one such word. Its meaning is not fluid in the way some would like to imagine, nor is it redeemable through political convenience or contemporary ethnonymic adoption.

No amount of institutional endorsement, parliamentary repetition, or nationalist rebranding can erase its original semantic function. The word carries with it a historical judgment that cannot be legislated away.

The fact that certain Basotho politicians or elites have chosen to adopt the term as a self identifier does not, and cannot, alter its meaning. Meaning is not created by power alone, it is forged in historical action.

“Tswana” remains a descriptor that emerged to mark those who chose separation, withdrawal, or departure from their kin. Embedded within it is the notion of breaking away, of opting out, of prioritising self preservation or advantage over collective continuity. At its core, it encodes betrayal as a value, not as an accident.

For this reason, the term has always functioned as a term of scorn. It is not merely descriptive, it is evaluative. It does not simply name, it judges. It derogates by design, because it arose to identify those who were perceived to have abandoned relational obligations to their people.

That moral charge has never dissipated. It persists precisely because the behaviour it names has continued, the distancing, the refusal of kinship, the insistence on separation as identity.

In this sense, the word operates almost like a self reinforcing incantation. Not because it possesses mystical power, but because those who adopt it often enact the very separation it signifies.

The name and the behaviour mirror each other, producing a cycle that appears curse like only because it is unexamined. Language, when internalised without critique, becomes destiny.

What is most tragic is not the insult embedded in the term, but the ongoing fracture it sustains. The continued embrace of this false and unjustifiable separation entrenches alienation among people who share blood, history, and cosmological inheritance. It fractures what was once whole, and then pretends that the fracture is natural, ancient, or inevitable.

This is not a call for coercion, nor for the erasure of lived identities, but for intellectual honesty and moral courage. True reconciliation cannot occur while words that encode betrayal are worn as badges of pride without interrogation.

Healing requires naming things as they are, tracing them to their origins, and refusing to sanctify historical wounds through denial.

My wish is not to dominate the narrative, but to end a separation that lacks both ethical justification and historical necessity. To confront the term honestly is not to attack people, it is to liberate them from a linguistic inheritance that keeps them estranged from their own kin.

Only through such confrontation can reunion, dignity, and truth become possible.

Send a message to learn more

01/01/2026

Ngwa and Ngwaha: Origin, Lived Time, and Relational Continuity in Sesotho

By Morena Nkokoto II

Abstract

This article examines the morphemic element *ngwa* and its extended expression in *ngwaha* within Sesotho, from a linguistic, etymological, and indigenous epistemological perspective. It argues that *ngwa* functions as a deep semantic carrier of origin, emergence, and continuity, while the suffix *-ha* situates this emergence within a lived temporal frame.

Through an analysis of kinship terms and temporal expressions, including seasonal cycles and distinctions between past, present, and future years, the article demonstrates that Sesotho conceptualises time as inhabited, cyclical, and embodied, rather than abstract or linear. Language is shown to encode a worldview in which life, kinship, and time share the same ontological logic.

1. Introduction

Sesotho, like many African languages, resists analysis when forced into purely linear or mechanistic linguistic models. Meaning is not confined to lexical definition but emerges through relation, process, and lived experience.

Words encode philosophy. One of the clearest examples of this is the recurring presence of the morphemic element *ngwa* in words relating to childhood, kinship, and time.

This article builds on an examination of *ngwa* as a marker of origin and continuity, and expands it by situating *ngwaha* within a fully articulated indigenous conception of time. The argument advanced here is that Sesotho treats time itself as a living process, structured in the same way as human life.

2. Ngwa as a Marker of Origin and Emergence

In Sesotho, *ngwa* does not appear as an independent word. Its significance lies in its persistence as a semantic root. In *ngwana* (child), *ngwa* signals emergence or birth, while the suffix *-na* marks a living being. A *ngwana* is therefore not defined primarily by size, but by ontological status, namely one who has recently entered existence.

This logic extends to *ngwanana*, which specifies gender while retaining the core meaning of becoming. Identity is understood as developmental rather than static. Likewise, *ngwaneso* refers to a sibling not merely as a companion in age, but as one who shares origin. The emphasis is on common source, not proximity.

Kinship terms such as *rangwane* and *mangwane* further demonstrate this principle. A *rangwane* is a younger father, and *mangwane* is a younger mother, including the wife of a *rangwane*.

The assignment of kinship titles is governed not solely by biology but by participation in the continuity of the lineage. *Ngwa* anchors these relationships in origin and generational flow.

3. Ngwaha and the Linguistics of Lived Time

The word *ngwaha* is commonly translated as year, yet this translation obscures its internal structure and meaning. As with *ngwana*, *ngwa* marks emergence.

The suffix *-ha* functions as a situating marker, anchoring that emergence within a bounded experiential frame, comparable to the sense of “here, now”.

A *ngwaha* is therefore not an abstract measurement of time, but a lived temporal container. It is time that is inhabited.

This interpretation is reinforced by the internal articulation of the year through dihla, seasons whose names describe what happens within them rather than their astronomical position.

- Selemo, emergence and beginning
- Hlabula, fullness, heat, and expansion
- Hwetla, descent, harvesting, and drawing inward
- Mariha, contraction, endurance, and rest

A *ngwaha* is thus a complete cycle of lived processes, mirroring the life cycle of a person.

4. Temporal Distance and Memory

Sesotho further distinguishes time through relational distance from lived experience.

- Ngwahola refers to a year that has completed its cycle and passed. The suffix *-la* marks completion and departure, something that has crossed beyond presence.

- Ngwaholakola intensifies this removal. It refers to a year that was succeeded by another year, encoding layered temporal distance and memory rather than simple past tense.

These distinctions show that Sesotho does not treat the past as a flat category. Temporal depth is linguistically encoded.

5. Present and Future Time

The present year is referred to as monongwaha. *Mono* means one, or one finger. This expression situates the current year as singular, countable, and embodied. It is the year one can point to. Time here is apprehended through the body, not through abstraction.

The future, by contrast, is referred to as isao. Notably, it does not follow the structural pattern of past years. It is not framed as a completed cycle because it has not yet entered lived reality.

The future remains open, approaching, and undefined in experiential terms. This reflects a worldview in which the future is contingent, not predetermined.

6. Ontological Synthesis

When considered together, these linguistic patterns reveal a coherent ontology. *Ngwa* marks emergence and origin. *-Ha* situates that emergence within lived presence. Modifiers indicate distance from experience, whether immediate, remembered, or anticipated.

Time in Sesotho behaves like a living entity. A *ngwaha*, like a *ngwana*, is born, lives through stages, completes its cycle, and passes into memory. The parallel is structural, semantic, and philosophical.

7. Conclusion

Although *ngwa* is not a standalone word in Sesotho, its semantic weight is profound. It carries meanings of origin, continuity, growth, and relational belonging across domains of personhood, kinship, and time. Through *ngwaha*, Sesotho affirms that time itself is alive, cyclical, and embodied.

To engage Sesotho linguistically is therefore to encounter an indigenous philosophy of being, one in which existence unfolds through shared origins and lived cycles. Language here is not merely descriptive. It is memory, lineage, and life speaking itself forward.

Send a message to learn more