05/23/2026
There has been continued public discussion about whether Mrs. Cathy Dodson participated in the Wichita Falls Professional Firefighters Association candidate process.
Recently, it was publicly claimed that this was a “fabrication” by Al Vitolo.
That is not accurate.
The issue is not whether Mrs. Dodson used a specific phrase such as, “I am asking for your endorsement.” The issue is whether she voluntarily participated in the WFPFFA candidate process used at that time, met with our members, and accepted consideration for support.
The documentation shows that she did.
The original scheduling conversation was with Mrs. Dodson’s campaign page from her prior campaign. That page has since been deleted. A later message from Mrs. Dodson’s personal account corroborates the meeting by acknowledging Bobby Whiteley being in the audience and referencing the association’s vote.
Mrs. Dodson was invited to participate, accepted the invitation, selected a time, requested the location, confirmed she would attend, appeared in association meeting records, and later acknowledged both the audience and the association’s vote.
That is not a personal attack. That is the record.
Candidates are free to oppose PACs, endorsements, or organized political support. But voters also deserve candor and consistency, especially when a candidate later describes those same types of processes as candidates being “bought,” “branded,” or controlled.
Public Texas Ethics Commission records also show Mrs. Dodson made monetary contributions to Wichita County Republican Women, a Texas Ethics Commission general-purpose committee, in 2024.
There is nothing wrong with citizens contributing to political committees. Mrs. Dodson has every right to participate politically, just as firefighters and other citizens do.
The issue is consistency.
A candidate should not participate in political committee activity, voluntarily participate in an endorsement process, and then later describe similar political activity as corruption, “branding,” or candidates being “bought” only when the support goes to someone else.
The same process cannot be harmless participation when a candidate wants to be heard, but corruption or “branding” when the support goes to someone else.
Fair questions are not harassment.
Candidate candor matters.
Accountability cannot be a one-way street.
The documentation is attached so people can review the record for themselves.