Citizens for a Greater Downtown St. Louis

Citizens for a Greater Downtown St. Louis Citizens for a Greater Downtown St. Louis

06/19/2023

Sadly, the mass shooting that occurred in Downtown St. Louis was entirely predictable. In fact, it was inevitable. Large groups of young people out late at night, alcohol, guns, unregulated short-term rentals, irresponsible landlords, and illegal bars are a volatile combination.

The usual tired responses of our local elected officials to this horrific violence are no different than “thoughts and prayers” offered by those who stubbornly defend permissive gun laws. More late-night activities for teens? Why encourage young teens to be out at 2 am? More pleas for parents to not drop off kids downtown? How many times have we heard that after each tragic event? It’s all the state’s fault for enacting permissive gun laws so there’s nothing we can do. More press conferences and photo-ops?

We hear Mayor Jones’ words and don’t doubt her sincerity or her care for the community, but it’s time to move beyond those words toward serious, continuing, resolute action by city government, SLMPD, and civic groups.

It’s time for some honesty on all sides. Yes, it is unconscionable for access to guns to be so permissive and we urge the state to consider some commonsense restrictions. But given how many guns are already in circulation and how many guns on the street are stolen, it is foolish to believe that will have any near-term impact.

Regional solutions for crime and violence are only a vague concept right now, and similarly will not occur in the near-term, if ever.

To continue to rely on stale rhetoric or to suggest that there’s nothing we can do now to make our communities safer is wrong. For the moment, at least, there is no substitute for more effective law enforcement. As our recent report pointed out, proactive law enforcement rarely happens because too few officers are patrolling downtown. Police are too often just reacting to incidents after they occur.

And even when perpetrators, especially juveniles, are detained by police, there are ultimately no consequences. That sends the wrong message to kids and their parents.

Ordinances that address the sources of violent behavior are important, but they must be effective and enforceable now. Half-measures enacted just to say that we did something are an offense to our communities and to the victims of violence. Ordinances must be specific, enforceable, and resources made available to enforce them.

An ordinance to regulate short-term rentals is now under consideration, but as written it is easy to evade and nearly impossible to enforce. It has taken years to get this bill considered and, if passed, it will take years to implement. Some select amendments to the bill can make it effective.

The Board of Aldermen is now considering a bill to make it easier for problem operators to get liquor licenses. On what planet is that a good thing? While it does take too long for responsible owners to get licenses, creating loopholes to allow almost anybody to get a license is just inviting even more trouble than we now face.

The Board is also considering an ordinance to allow for some reasonable regulation of open carry of weapons. We have seen too many pictures of young people wielding semi-automatic weapons on our streets. It has been suggested that a limited, commonsense, method of limiting open carry is racist or somehow related to “stop and frisk”. That is a red herring being used for political purposes. Again, more honesty is needed.

If we truly care about our community, our kids, and the many victims of crime and violence, we can no longer treat law enforcement as if it’s not part of the solution. For the summer ahead, it may be the only solution.

03/06/2023

Your vote is important in the upcoming election tomorrow, this Tuesday, March 7. The size of the Board of Aldermen is being reduced to fourteen and Downtown will be represented by two aldermen.

Residents generally east of 9th Street are in the 8th Ward, while those west of 9th are in the 14th Ward.

As you decide who to vote for, we urge you to consider voting for the candidates that have shown that they understand the issues Downtown, that have specific ideas for supporting Downtown, that have a demonstrated record of supporting our interests.

We need aldermen who have shown they will not slavishly adhere to any ideological label, whether “progressive” or “moderate” or be tainted by conflicts-of-interest or political alliances that compromise their independence and willingness to support our Downtown interests.

Downtown voters can make the difference in the upcoming election. Please vote!

One-off "events" are not what "activates" a city. After all, we have 81 baseball games and 40 hockey games (not includin...
04/12/2022

One-off "events" are not what "activates" a city. After all, we have 81 baseball games and 40 hockey games (not including playoffs) and multiple events at the convention center. When we talk about activating the street, it's about all-day everyday activity. Pedestrians, shopping, sightseeing, etc. If the streets are mainly dead except for events, that's not really accomplishing the goal. Nor does it make downtown any safer. If we still have illegal bars & clubs, short-term rentals, scooters, cruising, etc. nothing truly changes.

St. Louis leadership is always looking for the silver bullet ... a stadium, Arch ground improvements, a one-off festival. Success will come when the basic conditions for economic growth are established -- public safety, infrastructure, public services, etc. The research demonstrates that.

The problem is that everyone focuses on the quick fix because that's what will win the next election, or get the next donation. But in the end, nothing really changes.

“Matt O'Leary, one of the plaintiffs, said in a statement that the 45-pg suit ‘demonstrates that the CID was not even cl...
02/22/2022

“Matt O'Leary, one of the plaintiffs, said in a statement that the 45-pg suit ‘demonstrates that the CID was not even close to obtaining valid signatures from a majority of CID area property owners, despite the finding from the city.’" -St. Louis Business Journal

Opponents of a downtown taxing district have filed more litigation, this time seeking to halt the group's 20-year extension.

“This group has been ineffective for 20 years.” -Jim Gallagher & David Nicklaus
02/17/2022

“This group has been ineffective for 20 years.” -Jim Gallagher & David Nicklaus

TAX BATTLE: Downtown property owners are suing a special taxing district over taxes it has collected. Jim Gallagher and David Nicklaus say that although some of the dissidents’ criticism is

What the what?:
01/08/2022

What the what?:

Some properties were left off the rolls entirely, as if they didn’t exist. Others were charged properly for years and then lucked into a discount.

The St. Louis Board of Aldermen Ways and Means Committee meeting Wednesday was an amateurish, biased sham of a public he...
12/04/2021

The St. Louis Board of Aldermen Ways and Means Committee meeting Wednesday was an amateurish, biased sham of a public hearing on renewal of the Downtown Community Improvement District. Nearly all proponents were board members (including two aldermen), contractors or employees of the CID. The CID’s attorneys (Husch Blackwell) and bill sponsor (Jack Coatar) were given unlimited time to provide biased and often misleading information. CID staff and board members were provided unlimited time at the beginning of the meeting, while others were limited to three minutes. The description of downtown and performance of the CID by proponents was devoid of data and at variance with the stark reality that those of us who live, work, and invest in downtown see every day. Opponents were dismissed as having no plan and unwilling to talk to the CID, both patently false statements, but opponents were not permitted to correct the record. Board Bill 124, which would extend the CID without a vote of property owners, was described as simply a “belt and suspenders” to allow the CID to expend unused fund balances in case property owners did not approve renewal. In fact, it is an insidious attempt to deprive the downtown community of its property rights and limit any appeal of improper decisions made by the City and the CID in the renewal process.

Watch the full hearing here: https://youtu.be/dyqafxvFZTI

The Old CID is attempting to renew without the required majority approval of property owners. We have a community meetin...
11/01/2021

The Old CID is attempting to renew without the required majority approval of property owners. We have a community meeting scheduled for 7:00 pm TONIGHT for the Downtown & Downtown West communities. You can use the following link to register:

Welcome! You are invited to join a webinar: Community Improvement District Discussion. After registering, you will receive a confirmation email about joining the webinar.

The Old CID is attempting to renew without the required majority approval of property owners. We have a community meetin...
10/31/2021

The Old CID is attempting to renew without the required majority approval of property owners. We have a community meeting scheduled for 7:00 pm tomorrow for the Downtown & Downtown West communities. You can use the following link to register:

Welcome! You are invited to join a webinar: Community Improvement District Discussion. After registering, you will receive a confirmation email about joining the webinar.

10/06/2021

Citizens’ below linked letter highlights increasingly desperate attempts by the CID to renew itself, even in the absence of required signatures, including what we believe is an unprecedented and illegal attempt to assess property owners for 2022 – after the current CID expires. This should be an affront to all downtown property owners.

Address

St. Louis, MO

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Citizens for a Greater Downtown St. Louis posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Organization

Send a message to Citizens for a Greater Downtown St. Louis:

Share