Safe Technology for Santa Barbara County

Safe Technology for Santa Barbara County Mission:Educating our community about the adverse cumulative effects of invisible wireless radiation.

02/17/2025

On Feb. 4, 2025, the Santa Barbara County Supervisors voted 5-0 for the newest and worst of a series of county telecom ordinances, since 2019. The board basically ignored, dismissed, and discredited our public comments and made the wrong decision. Laura Capps and Steve Lavagnino's behavior, during the meeting showed a disregard and lack of respect for the 30-40 people live and on zoom who
were there to oppose this ordinance and make public comments. The majority of people in the room did not get a chance to state their comments.
We need more people to join us to let the supervisors know that they made an unsound, UNBALANCED and unacceptable decision, that needs to be changed. If you would like to support our continued effort to improve this ordinance, please contact: [email protected]. For more information go to our webpage: http://emfsafetynetwork.org/safe-technology-for-santa-barbara-take-action/.

02/03/2025

**** Please take action and forward this to your friends, neighbors and social media. We also need as many people to show up at the Board of Supervisors Meeting on Tuesday morning, Feb 4 ****

On Tuesday, February 4, 2025, the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors will vote on amendments to the County's Wireless Ordinance that will allow the telecoms to blanket our neighborhoods with small cell antennas, removing essential restrictions. This dangerous Ordinance removes notification, hearings, opposition, setbacks and environmental protection. Applications and permits will be rubber stamped!

Request to Supervisors:

Please vote NO, ABSTAIN or PAUSE the vote on the Wireless Ordinance and work with Attorney Julian Gresser. https://www.bbilan.org/blog/2025-01-24-bbilan-letter-to-santa-barbara-county-board-of-supervisors

Please read Dr. Kent Chamberlain's recent letter submitted to the Board before the hearing.

For more information, details and talking points for public comments go to:
http://emfsafetynetwork.org/safe-technology-for-santa-barbara-take-action/

TAKE ACTION

Send written comments by 5 PM Mon. Feb. 3, 2025 to:
, , ,, , , , ,
For details for written, zoom and in person voice comments:
https://ca-santabarbaracounty.civicplus.pro/2836/Board-of-Supervisors-Methods-of-Particip

What we want:

CEQA, NEPA, environmental laws and coastal hearing review

Liability insurance for harm and death

Radiofrequency monitoring

Proper pre-mailed notification within 1500 feet of proposed telecom facility to occupants

notification on the agendas, opportunity to attend hearings, oppose and appeal

Reasonable and safe setbacks, eg 1500 feet

Require Licensed professional electrical engineers to oversee building and installing, and to inspect, approve, sign and seal applications and permits

Proof of a significant gap in cell phone service on application
Adopt Malibu Fire safety protocol

Restore local government discretion on antenna location, so property owners can cooperate with authorities to zone cell towers far from bedrooms, classrooms and parks.

Prioritize WIRED broadband connection

Talking points:

The FCC states that safety belongs to the municipalities to regulate.

A small cell or cell tower adjacent to a home can reduce property values by 20% and 90% of buyers will avoid purchasing such a home.

We need more local authority over cell towers, not less, including that wireless companies provide liability insurance for harm and death. We must not give a free pass to the the multi trillion dollar telecom industry at the expense of notification, property values, dangerous fire risks, privacy, huge carbon footprint, health and safety.

There is currently no monitoring of radiation of cell towers, so we have no idea if the radiation exceeds the FCC’s outdated and obsolete exposure limits. Neither the FCC, carriers or installers will be monitoring. Who will be liable for biological harm?

Wireless facilities increase the risk of fires. If the supervisors vote for this ordinance, they are ignoring very dangerous fire risks.
Four Southern California fires have been started by telecom equipment and overloaded poles, costing billions of dollars. We need fire safety protocols, and to adopt the Malibu Fire Safety Protocol

The FCC states that safety belongs to the municipalities to regulate.

Wireless facilities increase the risk of fires. If the supervisors vote for this ordinance, they are ignoring very dangerous fire risks. Four Southern California fires have been started by telecom equipment and overloaded poles, costing billions of dollars.

1. The fires in Los Angeles City and County have shown California and the world that we are dealing with a climate crisis, with impossible conditions under which to fight fire.

2. Santa Barbara County must do everything in their power to prevent fires from starting.

3. Cell towers and their associated equipment can and do start fires.

4. Cell tower fires are electrical fires and they cannot be fought through conventional means (water suppression) until the grid has been cut. Otherwise, anyone putting water on a cell tower fire will be electrocuted.

5. Amidst Santa Ana conditions, cell tower fires can grow exponentially in a matter of seconds.

6. We are imploring SB County to implement Malibu's Fire Safety Protocol for electrical engineering rigor, and the federally required APCO ANSI for structural engineering rigor to help prevent fires in the first place.

7. We want a setback from all properties of at least 300 feet in urban settings and up to 1500 feet in rural settings. It takes longer to cut the grid in rural settings which gives the fire more time to spread and makes it harder for residents to escape from.

Telecommunication Ordinance Flaws:

• 20 feet setbacks for “small cell” antennas (unreasonable and hazardous)

No notice, no hearing, no way to oppose, no appeal (placard on pole definitely not adequate)

• Exemptions for coastal or environmental review (CEQA)

• Insufficient fire safety protocols

• No licensed professional electrical engineers to inspect, approve, sign and seal applications and permits for wireless facilities.

Today, SafeTech for SBC held a Press Conference on the steps of the SB County building, as a Call of Action for the Feb ...
01/29/2025

Today, SafeTech for SBC held a Press Conference on the steps of the SB County building, as a Call of Action for the Feb 4, 2025 Board of Supervisors (BOS) meeting. We encourage everyone to show up at the Feb 4 BOS meeting to express your opposition to the Wireless Ordinance amendments that will be voted on at that meeting.
Please read the details of the Press Release below:

Dangerous Fire Risks with Proposed County Wireless Ordinance

On February 4, 2025, the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors (BOS) will vote on a very dangerous Wireless Ordinance Amendment, removing public notification, hearings, opposition, setbacks and environmental protections. Small cell applications and permits will be rubber stamped!

We urge the BOS to vote NO or abstain on February 4.

Four Southern California fires have been started by telecom equipment and overloaded poles. Wireless facilities increase the risk of fires. We need fire safety protocols and other protections that are not only missing in the County’s Wireless Ordinance, but the Amendments make the situation much worse. The FCC states that safety, especially fire safety, is the responsibility of municipalities to regulate.

Issues ignored in the proposed Wireless Ordinance Amendment:

1. The fires in Los Angeles City and County have shown California and the world that we are dealing with a climate crisis, with impossible conditions under which to fight fire.

2. Santa Barbara County must do everything in their power to prevent fires from starting.

3. Cell towers and their associated equipment can and do start fires.

4. Cell tower fires are electrical fires and they cannot be fought through conventional means (water suppression) without specialized equipment until the grid has been cut. Otherwise, anyone spraying water on a cell tower fire risks being electrocuted.

5. Amidst Santa Ana wind conditions, cell tower fires can grow exponentially in a matter of seconds.

6. We are imploring SB County to implement Malibu's Fire Safety Protocol for electrical engineering rigor, and the federally required APCO ANSI for structural engineering rigor to help prevent fires in the first place.
See: https://www.malibucity.org/DocumentCenter/View/29653/Resolution-No-21-17

7. We want a setback from all properties of at least 300 feet in urban settings and up to 1500 feet in rural settings. It takes longer to cut the grid in rural settings which gives the fire more time to spread and makes it harder for residents to escape from.

Call for Action:

Send written comments to: [email protected].

Attend the BOS meeting on February 4, 2025 and urge the Supervisors, based on the fire risk alone to vote NO or abstain on the Wireless Ordinance Amendment.

Other ways to make your voice heard:

Safe Technology for Santa Barbara County (SafeTechSBC)
Mission: Educating our community about the adverse cumulative effects of invisible wireless radiation.
For more information:
http://emfsafetynetwork.org/safe-technology-for-santa-barbara-take-action/
• 2025-01-27 Foster Letter to Santa Barbara BOS_Chiefs

Please read this important article in the SB Independent. The upcoming note on Feb 4 by the Board of Supervisors (BOS) o...
01/21/2025

Please read this important article in the SB Independent. The upcoming note on Feb 4 by the Board of Supervisors (BOS) on the SB County Wireless ordinance amendments will put the County at greater risk of wildfire.
Please contact the BOS and let them know they need to vote NO or abstain from voting on Feb 4, so we can go back to the table and draft an ordinance that will be protective for the community.
See comments for instructions.

As a matter of policy, we urge that optical fiber networks are safer, faster, more durable, cost-effective, and energy resilient than wireless infrastructure.

Please read (and share) this detailed Letter to the Montecito Journal about the SB County Wireless ordinance amendments ...
01/13/2025

Please read (and share) this detailed Letter to the Montecito Journal about the SB County Wireless ordinance amendments that are scheduled to get voted on by the Board of Supervisors this coming Feb 4, 2025.

Please contact the Board of Supervisors and ask them vote NO or not vote at all on these amendments. They will take away protections for county residents, as well as increase the fire risks for all.

The letter can be found on page 11 and 20: https://issuu.com/santabarbarasentinel/docs/_mj_sop_layout_31_1_full

"February 4, 2025, six months after the County Board of Supervisors adopted the 2030 Climate Action Plan, they will be a...
01/05/2025

"February 4, 2025, six months after the County Board of Supervisors adopted the 2030 Climate Action Plan, they will be asked to give free reign to the telecoms to blanket your neighborhood with small cell antennas when they are called to vote on the amendments to our County Wireless Ordinance. These amendments remove all restrictions from the placement of wireless facilities, therefore the telecoms can install 89 cell antennas for every one that is actually needed, including a few feet of your bedroom."

Please contact your County Board Supervisors and ask them to vote NO on the ordinance amendments on Feb 4, 2025. See links in the comments.

Small cell 5G infrastructure consumes energy and requires mining and metals processing.

12/26/2024

Safe Technology for Santa Barbara County
Please go to webpage: http://emfsafetynetwork.org/safe-technology-for-santa-barbara-take-action/, for more info on the action item: Send written and make voice public comments to the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors to VOTE NO on SB 9 & the Wireless Ordinance Amendments. We want changes in the ordinance to make it more protective and to have collaborative workshops with our experts.

04/09/2024

House votes tomorrow (Tuesday) on HR 6492, which unless amended, will put cell towers/antennas throughout our national parks, forests and wildlife refuges.

Congressman Jared Huffman is a co-sponsor of this bad bill.
Please ask him to oppose HR 6942 unless it is amended to exclude Subtitle D - Sections 141, 142 and 143.

CALL D.C. Office:(202) 225-5161

HR 6492, the "Explore Act" contains:

Subtitle D—Broadband Connectivity on Federal Recreational Lands and Waters

Subtitle D- Sections 141 (Connect our Parks), 142, 143: will allow TELECOM to place CELL TOWERS on national parks and on federal lands wherever they choose.

75 EUCALYPTUS LANE - MONTECITO    - Please share forward if you know of someone who lives near this address. MBAR Agenda...
10/18/2021

75 EUCALYPTUS LANE - MONTECITO
- Please share forward if you know of someone who lives near this address.

MBAR Agenda for Thursday, October 21st / 10-21-21 | Contact Planner, Katie Nall with questions about this agenda item and request copies of the reports, application, etc.

Also, feel free to reach out to the SafeTechSBC team at [email protected] for assistance making public comment to voice your personal position as you might not want this small cell installation near your home. (health, property values, privacy, esthetics..)
CONCEPTUAL REVIEW/ PRELIMINARY APPROVAL
10. 21BAR-00000-00012 Crown Castle New Small Cell Wireless Facility Near- 75 Eucalyptus Lane
21CDP-00000-00008 (Katie Nall, Planner 884-8050) Ridgeline: Urban
Request of Jerry Ambrose, agent for the owners Infinity Group, to consider Case No. 21BAR-00000-00012 for further conceptual review/preliminary approval of a new small wireless facility constructed on an existing utility pole in the public right of way. The proposed project will not require grading. The property is zoned 15-R1 and shown as Assessor’s Parcel Number (near) 009-323-010, located (near) 75 Eucalyptus Lane the Montecito area, First Supervisorial District. (Continued from 04/08/21, 04/22/21, 06/03/21- not heard, 10/07/21)

Hello,
Please find attached the revised MBAR agenda for the meeting of October 21, 2021. Please note that the revision is the addition of item #9- Newman Family Trust Remodel, New Roof, New Deck, 9. 20BAR-00000-00136 Hardscape and Landscape Improvements. 1631 Posilipo Lane. Thank you and I apologize for any confusion.

Sharon : )

Sharon Mary Foster
Board Assistant Specialist Planning & Development
123 E. Anapamu St. Santa Barbara, CA 93101805-568-2026
[email protected]

Planning & Development Home page

SafeTechSBC also spoke at City Council right after the ordinance committee at 2 PM. We updated everyone on what just tra...
10/14/2021

SafeTechSBC also spoke at City Council right after the ordinance committee at 2 PM. We updated everyone on what just transpired and put more educational information into the public comment record.

THANK YOU to all who added their name to our most recent online petition and got involved. The word is out and growing!

This wireless ordinance process is still ongoing as you will see, so the more signatures, the better buzzz we will make to demand the protections we truly need for our city, and ultimately our county. Same issues, different ordinances. All ordinances need to be reviewed and updated accordingly.

Contact us at [email protected] if you would like to learn how to protect your city in the county and use the materials, resources, research and attorney generated reports, etc that we have compiled.

We look forward to sharing the economies of scale for our whole county.

Listen to our SafeTechSBC core team speaking at the Ordinance Committee yesterday re: the small cell wireless telecommun...
10/14/2021

Listen to our SafeTechSBC core team speaking at the Ordinance Committee yesterday re: the small cell wireless telecommunications ordinance that was "supposed to be" voted on, but it was delayed. Watch to see how it went down, including the presentation by the city and hear from both Tripp May, from the Telecom Law Firm (Jonathan Kramer) the City hired outside council and the SafeTechSBC hired expert attorney, Andrew Campinelli. This is to be continued, so stay tuned.

SafeTechSBC also spoke at the City Council next:

Address

Santa Barbara, CA

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Safe Technology for Santa Barbara County posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Organization

Send a message to Safe Technology for Santa Barbara County:

Share