09/10/2026
SCS Hosts Community Forum to Reiterate the Importance of Levy
A Special Report by the NAACP Sandusky Unit 3199-B
Thursday, September 10, 2026
SANDUSKY — Sandusky City Schools leaders, past and present, told residents Thursday that the district needs new local money to avoid deeper cuts to staff and student programs.
The district is asking voters to approve a 4.9-mill operating levy on Nov. 3. It would raise about $3.4 million a year. The district estimates the cost at about $14.06 a month for the owner of a $100,000 home. Some homeowners may pay less because of tax credits or exemptions.
Superintendent and CEO Dr. Luther E. Johnson Jr. said the district has stretched its money for years and has not asked voters for new operating funds in 14 years. But he also said current revenue is no longer enough to maintain the same services.
“It’s not about us; it’s about our students and the future of Sandusky,” Johnson said.
Costs are now higher than income, said Yvonne Anderson, treasurer of Sandusky City Schools. The district also is spending more than it receives and is using its savings to cover the difference.
Anderson compared the problem to a family whose bills are larger than its paycheck. “That’s where we are at right now,” she added.
SCS reports indicate the district reduced staffing costs by about $1.9 million during fiscal year 2026 through job cuts, restructuring and leaving some open positions unfilled. Earlier news coverage described 27 eliminated positions as part of a $1.6 million reduction plan. The later $1.9 million figure includes a broader group of staffing changes.
One of the most debated cuts was the K-6 Athletics, Activities and Success Coordinator position. Parents and former students said the employee helped organize activities and build relationships with children and families. The board eliminated the job on a 4-1 vote, with Board Vice President Ebony Sizemore dissenting.
District leaders said student activities and other major services would continue. Taxpayers, however, still deserve clear answers.
The district has made real cuts, but voters also deserve a simple account of other spending. School budgets can include consultants, the temporary hiring of outside companies, extra-duty jobs, commonly referred to as “supplementals,” and the hiring of temporary administrators, who often are retirees.
Some of these costs may be needed or paid with money that can be used only for a certain purpose. Others may be optional. For every job or program cut, the board should explain how much was saved, why that item was chosen and whether similar work will later be given to an outside company or another paid position. That does not mean later spending is improper. It simply means taxpayers should be able to see whether a new arrangement truly saves money.
The public board records reviewed for this report did not provide enough clear information to prove claims that an outside company replaced the elementary activities coordinator or that a new strength-training job canceled out earlier savings.
Those questions should be answered with the contract amount, job duties and source of funding before firm conclusions are drawn.
Board Vice President Ebony Sizemore, a Sandusky graduate and the parent of a current student, said families feel the same higher costs the district faces. She said students still need teachers, activities and help at school.
“They still need teachers. They need activities, and they need the support of school,” Sizemore said.
Former superintendent Dr. Eugene T.W. Sanders, who led the effort that resulted in three new elementary schools, including the Sandusky Early Learning Academy, Sandusky Primary School and Sandusky Intermediate School, also urged residents to consider what students could lose if the levy is voted down.
“It’s important to support our children and to support the faculty and staff of this district,” Sanders said.
Sandusky currently offers programs that many districts cannot.
Sandusky students can choose from career-technical programs, college classes, visual and performing arts, athletics and many clubs.
The welding program gives students access to modern equipment, college credit and possible apprenticeship opportunities.
A district-record 14 graduating seniors of the Class of 2026 earned associate degrees while completing high school. District information indicates that was more than any other school system in Erie County and nearby Huron, Ottawa and Sandusky counties. A full regional list was not available in the public records reviewed, so that comparison should continue to be credited to the district.
These programs make Sandusky different. They also cost money to staff, operate and maintain. Levy money would help keep current programs, but passage would not end the need for careful spending and public reporting.
Academic results also cannot be overlooked. The district faces a serious academic challenge.
Sandusky has remained below Ohio’s three-star standard for overall performance. On the 2023-24 state report card, it earned 2.5 stars. Recent testing data also show that far too many students are not reading or doing math at grade level, although the district’s graduation rate and career and college pathways are stronger areas.
Some lists place Sandusky near the bottom of Ohio districts, including a widely repeated ranking of 598th out of 611. That is not an official ranking issued by the state. Ohio publishes star ratings and performance data, while outside groups turn selected numbers into rankings.
The state also changed the report-card formula during the past four years, making a simple year-to-year ranking less reliable. The basic point remains: Sandusky must improve student learning. If the levy passes, the board should tell the public what academic gains it expects, when those gains should occur, and how progress will be reported.
The decision before voters:
A “yes” vote would provide about $3.4 million in new yearly operating money to help maintain staff, transportation, technology, arts, athletics, career-tech and other student services. A “no” vote would reject the new tax and likely force the board to consider more cuts, although the district has not released a final list of what would be reduced.
Voters are being asked to weigh two facts at once. Many families are struggling with higher bills and may not welcome another property tax. At the same time, the district has a growing gap between what it receives and what it spends.
Sandusky has valuable programs worth protecting, serious academic weaknesses that require improvement and a duty to show taxpayers exactly how new money would be used.