Washington Coalition for Open Government

Washington Coalition for Open Government WashCOG is an independent, nonpartisan and nonprofit advocate of open government and informed citizens. We welcome public comments on our page.

Please do not post comments with profanity or libelous language.

Agencies in Washington state often complain about the expense of fulfilling public records requests. At times they portr...
08/30/2026

Agencies in Washington state often complain about the expense of fulfilling public records requests. At times they portray the cost as burdensome.

A reality check was in order.

We found a way to estimate what agencies spend on fulfilling records requests as a percent of total agency spending. Our estimate is based on public data reported by 90 cities and counties for calendar year 2022.

Of their total spending that year, fulfilling records requests accounted for about 0.25%.

In a warehouse with 400 boxes, 0.25% is … one box.

Cities and counties get a lot of records requests. Of the 10 agencies in our state with the most requests between 2020 and 2024, six of them were cities and counties.

Spending 0.25% of their total outlays on records requests doesn’t sound anything like a structural budget crisis. A small city might spend 0.25% on a piece of park equipment. A mid-sized city might spend 0.25% on a tourism marketing grant.

What does spending 0.25% on records requests buy? It buys transparency, accountability, informed citizens and public trust. That’s a bargain.

What follows is a brief note on our methodology.

We tapped calendar-year data from two sources. One was the self-reported cost of fulfilling records requests compiled by the Washington state Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee. The other was the U.S. Census Bureau’s 2022 Census of Governments, which collected total spending by agency.

We used Anthropic’s AI agent Claude to compile, sort and analyze the data.

Ninety-five cities and counties in Washington state appeared in both datasets. We threw out five because of apparent reporting errors, leaving us with the final sample of 90 agencies.

Don’t underestimate transparency litigant Arthur West.That’s our simple observation from the recent fracas involving Wes...
08/29/2026

Don’t underestimate transparency litigant Arthur West.

That’s our simple observation from the recent fracas involving West, Initiative 645, the Washington State Republican Party and Thurston County Superior Court Judge Chris Lanese.

The dispute began when Lanese denied West’s request to either change or remove a disclosure statement attached to I-645. The ballot measure would repeal a new state income tax on annual household wage income that exceeds $1 million.

I-645 sponsors were annoyed, and the state GOP attacked West. West then sued the state party chair for defamation.

In a heated and profane exchange with the state GOP’s attorney, West – the “non-lawyer” – appears to more than hold his own.

It’s a complicated tale with several moving parts. An imaginary genre for this story might be “Olympia Baroque.”

We’re not going to dwell on the details because the story has been thoroughly covered elsewhere, and we’re a nonpartisan open-government advocate.

Open-government advocate Jamie Nixon devoted his latest podcast episode to this story. Listen to The Public Records Officer Podcast at https://www.thepublicrecordsofficer.com/ep-23-west-v-wa-gop/

For a profanity-free explanation, read Jerry Cornfield’s story in the Washington State Standard at https://washingtonstatestandard.com/2026/08/27/wa-gop-party-leader-sued-for-defamation-by-citizen-activist/

Finally, the court hearing in question was recorded and archived by TVW -- Washington Public Affairs Network. Watch the hearing at
https://tvw.org/video/thurston-county-superior-court-2026081076/

Below, a screenshot of Arthur West addressing Thurston County Superior Court Judge Chris Lanese on Aug. 7. TVW image.

WashCOG is on a road trip! Today we’re in Spokane for a Key Award presentation. Below, the public sculpture “The Joy of ...
08/27/2026

WashCOG is on a road trip! Today we’re in Spokane for a Key Award presentation. Below, the public sculpture “The Joy of Running Together” in downtown Spokane. It commemorates the city’s annual Lilac Bloomsday Run.
WashCOG photo.

Emergency dispatch centers receive many public records requests, especially in the aftermath of high-profile crimes, acc...
08/25/2026

Emergency dispatch centers receive many public records requests, especially in the aftermath of high-profile crimes, accidents or natural disasters. That’s when journalists are likely to be among the requesters.

A case in point: Media outlets in recent days published and broadcast stories based on calls to 911 dispatchers during the deadly shooting at the Bite of Seattle on July 26. KOMO and KING television, as well as The Seattle Times, were among the media outlets that relied on disclosed dispatch calls.

Calls to 911 are often just as chaotic as the incidents that prompted them, but they do help observers assemble a rough narrative of events, bringing a little more coherence to the moment.

The calls are available under the state Public Records Act.

Some emergency dispatch centers process enormous numbers of records requests. They often appear on our lists of high-volume agencies.

In 2024, the most recent year available, South Sound 911 received 34,905 records requests, Snohomish County 911 received 10,584 and Clark Regional Emergency Services 8,317. Those are big numbers, larger than most state agencies.

Despite the high volumes, some emergency dispatch centers have learned how to process all of those requests efficiently.

In 2024, South Sound 911 spent an average of $16.85 per request. NORCOM 911, a dispatch agency in King County, spent an average of $29.35 on each request – and NORCOM had 3,813 requests that year.

School districts, state agencies and public colleges and universities spent far more – as in several multiples – per request in 2024. Perhaps they could learn something from their local dispatch centers.

Source: WashCOG analysis of agencies’ self-reported data compiled annually by the Washington state Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee.

See KOMO’s online report by Joel Moreno via msn at https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/911-recordings-capture-panic-during-bite-of-seattle-shooting-at-seattle-center/ar-

For the second time in 30 days Jamie Nixon has sued the Washington State Patrol for alleged violations of the state Publ...
08/25/2026

For the second time in 30 days Jamie Nixon has sued the Washington State Patrol for alleged violations of the state Public Records Act.

The open-government advocate filed the lawsuit Monday in Thurston County Superior Court.

Earlier this month Nixon submitted a records request with the State Patrol that sought “records sufficient to identify WSP investigations” into allegations of destroyed, concealed or altered public records.

Nine days later, the agency closed the request without disclosing any records.

The State Patrol told Nixon that its search came up empty. It added that the State Patrol maintains only its own records and not those for other state agencies.

Nixon responded, saying he sought the State Patrol’s own records. He also said he had communications “confirming” at least one investigation into the alleged destruction of public records at another agency.

Weeks earlier, on July 31, Nixon sued the State Patrol for failing to conduct an adequate search for records related to the agency’s use of artificial intelligence.

Nixon’s latest case was assigned No. 26-2-05160-34 in Thurston County Superior Court.

The man behind 53 records requests for images from Flock Safety cameras in Washington state says he did it to raise publ...
08/23/2026

The man behind 53 records requests for images from Flock Safety cameras in Washington state says he did it to raise public awareness about the surveillance technology.

Jose Rodriguez, 36, told reporter Isaac Stone Simonelli of the Cascadia Daily News that he first became aware of the automatic roadside cameras in 2024.

At first, his plan was to post the obtained images online and explain how Flock’s devices differed from roadside cameras that document speeding motorists. He hoped to kindle a civic discussion about the technology and how local governments were using it.

“People actually started paying attention … and understanding what those cameras were really about,” Rodriguez told Stone Simonelli for a story published Thursday.

Rodriguez became a public records plaintiff when about one third of the agencies failed to comply with his requests. Litigation and a series of settlements followed.

His attorney, Tim Hall with the Yakima firm of Hall & Gilliland, told the Cascadia Daily News, “Had the cities processed Mr. (Jose) Rodriguez’s records request correctly, there never would have been a need for litigation.”

Read Isaac Stone Simonelli’s story in the Cascadia Daily News at
https://www.cascadiadaily.com/2026/aug/20/a-man-has-sued-local-governments-in-wa-over-flock-records-hes-gotten-300k/

Below: Some Rodriguez' court documents with a photo of a Flock Safety camera in New Jersey by MiracleMiles via Wikimedia Commons. License at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en

Hall and Gilliland Attorneys at Law

The state Supreme Court elaborated Thursday on a recall petition that includes an allegation that port commissioners ret...
08/22/2026

The state Supreme Court elaborated Thursday on a recall petition that includes an allegation that port commissioners retaliated against an employee for disclosing an investigation report.

Among the allegations in the recall of all three Port of Benton commissioners is the claim that they retaliated against former port Finance Director Alicia Myers by firing her. Myers also served as the agency’s public records officer.

In a brief statement in July, the Supreme Court upheld a lower court ruling that allowed the recall to proceed. Justices elaborated on their reasoning in a unanimous opinion released Thursday.

The rulings freed petitioners to gather the signatures needed to put on the ballot the recall of Port of Benton commissioners Scott Keller, William O’Neil and Lori Stevens.

The conflict began last year, when Port Executive Director Diahann Howard, now suspended, and then-Port Commissioner Roy Keck turned over to the agency’s lawyer written complaints against Keller.

The port’s attorney hired a law firm to investigate the grievances, according to court records. The firm’s report, completed in December 2025, found evidence to support several complaints against Keller.

Port commissioners in January suspended Howard and curtailed the responsibilities of her job.

One month later commissioners fired Myers, who told the Tri-City Herald that her dismissal was in retaliation for releasing the investigation report to records requesters. The report was a disclosable record under the state Public Records Act.

In their opinion Thursday, Supreme Court justices said Myers’ comments to the Tri-City Herald were factually and legally sufficient to be included in the recall petition. “A voter could reasonably view Myers’ termination as part of a pattern of retaliation,” the court said.

Occasionally we find documented instances of public officials interfering with public records officers and disclosures. In recent years the office of former Seattle Mayor Jenny Durkan and the Monroe School District meddled with public records requests.

The frequency of these incidents is unknown, but they are troubling no matter how often they occur. Officials who interfere with public records disclosures undermine a foundational civic principle – that the public must know what its government is doing. Only then can we make informed decisions and hold our government accountable.

The court opinion is on the Washington Courts website at
https://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/1052537.pdf

Read reporter Wendy Culverwell’s account of the Supreme Court ruling in the Tri-City Herald via msn at
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/wa-s-highest-court-spells-out-why-it-approved-port-of-benton-recall-petitions/ar-AA2aGoXD?ctsrc=dgst&ocid=edgntpruby&pc=U531&cvid=6a89cfeb856a4f27be412441f8cf2ee6&uxmode=ruby&ei=8&apiversion=v2&domshim=1&noservercache=1&noservertelemetry=1&batchservertelemetry=1&renderwebcomponents=1&wcseo=1

Below, the Port of Benton Commission as posted on the agency's website.

Spokane County Commissioners on Tuesday paused permitting for large data centers amid growing concerns about the facilit...
08/20/2026

Spokane County Commissioners on Tuesday paused permitting for large data centers amid growing concerns about the facilities among county residents.

Records disclosures played an influential role by informing county residents about proposed data centers and revealing what local public officials and agencies are doing.

Commissioners voted unanimously to pause building permits for large data centers until Dec. 15, according to news reports. The interlude buys time for county officials to work on zoning regulations related to the facilities, which are contending with a nationwide backlash.

In Spokane County, public interest in the issue quickly swelled. County commission meetings, normally thinly attended, drew dozens of people.

Among the public speakers Tuesday was Spokane resident Brittany Anderson. She used the state Public Records Act to unearth communications between a Spokane County commissioner, utility officials and the CEO of a data center developer.

Anderson shared the records freely, and her revelations were picked up by the local press.

“Residents deserve transparency before decisions are made that could affect our water, power structure, utility costs, environment and quality of life for decades,” Anderson told commissioners.

Listen to her comments at https://www.facebook.com/share/r/19VtGK7YKA/

We are neutral on data centers, but we wholeheartedly support public access to government records.

In many ways what happened in Spokane was a best-case scenario. A resident obtained documents through the public records act and shared them. The records informed the community and accelerated a civic conversation. The press picked up the information and spread it further. Local government responded and acted.

In no way did the process resemble a Swiss watch, but it was probably what James Madison and many of the other Founders had in mind.

For a news account of the commission meeting, see Aaron Hedge’s report in RANGE at https://www.rangemedia.co/spokane-county-four-month-moratorium-data-center/

Below: The entrance to the Spokane County Courthouse. Photo by Will Maupin via Wikimedia Commons.

Requesters asking the city of Seattle for a copy of its former police chief’s contract may have to wait four months, TJ ...
08/19/2026

Requesters asking the city of Seattle for a copy of its former police chief’s contract may have to wait four months, TJ Martinell of The Center Square reported Monday.

Shon Barnes resigned as chief of the city’s police department July 30, after City Hall came under fire for how it handled a shooting at Seattle Center that killed three people and injured four others.

Martinell filed a records request for Barnes’ contract on July 29. The city’s public records office replied Aug. 5 and said it would provide the contract around Dec. 4.

WashCOG Secretary George Erb said agencies can and should consider putting a priority on disclosing records that inform timely civic issues, especially amid controversy.

Read TJ Martinell’s story in The Center Square at https://www.thecentersquare.com/washington/article_e307e468-554f-4991-8150-fa87f82b2f27.html

Below: Seattle City Hall. Seattle City Council photo via Wikimedia.

Washington state’s Sunshine Committee soldiers on despite lacking an appointed chair and largely being ignored by the st...
08/18/2026

Washington state’s Sunshine Committee soldiers on despite lacking an appointed chair and largely being ignored by the state Legislature.

The advisory committee reviews the 700-plus exemptions to the state Public Records Act and recommends changing or repealing specific statutes to state lawmakers.

Committee members will review 14 exemptions when they meet 9 a.m. Tuesday in Olympia. Observers can watch or listen in person, on Zoom or by telephone. TVW, the state’s public affairs network, also plans to cover the session.

The agenda, linked below, contains details about how to observe the meeting.

The committee has been without a chair since the resignation of Toby Nixon in April 2025. Vice Chair Rowland Thompson, executive director of Allied Daily Newspapers, has filled in since.

Gov. Bob Ferguson has so far appointed three people to the committee this year, yet the 13-member panel still has two vacancies, according to the governor’s office.

Appointed this year were:
• Zohaib Ali, vice president of product and tech at insurance company GEICO.
• Barbara Miner, former director of the King County Department of Judicial Administration.
• Tricia Smith, the Office of the Governor’s director of public information and records.

Two vacant seats remain, one representing local government and the other representing the general public. The governor selects a chair from among committee members.

Meanwhile, the state Legislature last adopted the committee’s recommendations in 2019. Earlier this year the state House passed legislation adopting the committee’s 2025 recommendations. The bill died in the state Senate.

The Sunshine Committee agenda is online at https://agportal-s3bucket.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/Sunshine%20Committee/20260818/Agenda%20August%2018%2C%202026%20Meeting_rev_fnl.pdf?VersionId=et51wrl5Ngp7yjBe8Sv.ARKk83s60ef4

Below: Microsoft Copilot illustration

Address

Redmond, WA

Opening Hours

Monday 8am - 5pm
Tuesday 8am - 5pm
Wednesday 8am - 5pm
Thursday 8am - 5pm
Friday 8am - 5pm

Telephone

+12067820393

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Washington Coalition for Open Government posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Share