Service Over Power Project

Service Over Power Project A public record of candidate responses under identical questions and conditions. No edits. No endorsements. Same questions. Same standards.

06/10/2026

Process Record — Phase 3 Nominee Response Record

KY-02 Congressional District

The following certified nominees were sent the Phase 3 question set.

Phase 3 Questions sent June 10, 2026.

Nominees
• Brett Guthrie — Questions sent.
• Megan Wingfield — Questions sent.

Responses will be published verbatim as they are received.

Phase 3 response window closes July 01, 2026.

Late response window closes July 16, 2026.

No endorsements.
No edits.
No interpretive commentary.

Same questions. Same standards.

06/10/2026

Process Note — Phase 3 Question Set

These questions are intended to explore constitutional duty, restraint, transparency, and the exercise of public authority when political, institutional, and personal consequences are present.

Question One
If enforcing a constitutional limit you believe is necessary would likely cost your party control of Congress, how would you proceed, and why?

Question Two
Describe a category of information you believe must be disclosed to the public even if doing so would damage your political standing, embarrass your institution, or undermine public confidence in government.

Question Three
Identify one power that is legal, commonly exercised by Congress or the executive branch, and available to you as a member of Congress that you would refuse to use. Explain your reasoning.

Question Four
Describe how you would evaluate a decision that is lawful but irreversible, where future harm is possible and uncertainty is unavoidable. What principles guide you when there is no opportunity to correct course later?

Question Five
If credible evidence of wrongdoing emerges during a period when investigation would cause significant political, economic, or international disruption, how would you determine whether to proceed immediately or delay action?

Question Six
Describe a situation in which your duty to the Constitution or the country would require you to act against the interests of your own reelection. How would you approach that decision?

Question Seven
What is one line you believe must never be crossed by someone holding your office, even if crossing it would be legal, effective, and publicly supported?

Questions were sent to all nominees under identical conditions.
Responses will be published verbatim as received.

No endorsements.
No edits.
No interpretive commentary.

Same questions. Same standards.

06/10/2026

Process Note — Phase 3 Opening

Phase 3 of the Service Over Power Project is now open.

This phase focuses on constitutional duty, transparency, restraint, and the exercise of public authority when political, institutional, and personal consequences are present.

Unlike Phase 2, which examined constitutional reasoning under pressure, Phase 3 examines how nominees approach decisions involving political cost, oversight, irreversible consequences, and the boundaries of lawful power.

Responses are requested in nominees own words and will be preserved verbatim.

No endorsements are made.
No party labels are applied.

The purpose of this phase is documentation of decision-making frameworks under conditions of responsibility, not evaluation of outcomes.

05/14/2026

Process Note — Replication Materials Release Timing

The Service Over Power Project replication materials will be released after the 2026 general election to avoid any appearance of influencing active electoral contests.

The record comes first. Expansion can wait.

Any materials that may appear publicly before that time are open to all, but caution and restraint remain warranted.

05/01/2026

Process Note — Label Definitions

This note defines labeling standards used across the Service Over Power Project for consistency and auditability.

Process Record — Time-bound events, actions, and statuses. (what occurred)

Process Note — Structural rules, methodology, and system design. (how it works)

Process Clarification — Resolves ambiguity or addresses questions about process application. (process application)

Closing Notice — Formal opening or closing of a phase or response window.

Supplemental Reference — External or illustrative material. (not part of the public record)

Foundational Philosophy — Purpose, intent, and framing (not part of the public record)

Civic Literacy Series — Educational content related to civic structure and principles. (not part of the public record)

Only Process Record posts constitute the formal public record.

All other labels provide context, structure, or reference and are not part of the formal public record.

These definitions apply across all phases unless otherwise noted.

S.O.P.P. Civic Literacy Series — Mill (Reflection)John Stuart Mill approached democracy from a different perspective tha...
05/01/2026

S.O.P.P. Civic Literacy Series — Mill (Reflection)

John Stuart Mill approached democracy from a different perspective than James Madison and Alexis de Tocqueville.

Madison focused on the structure of government.

Tocqueville observed the habits of citizens.

Mill focused on the individual mind.

He believed that even with participation and structure in place, a system could weaken if independent thinking declined.

Freedom of thought and open discussion were not secondary.

They are essential.

A system may allow participation…
But its strength depends on how individuals engage with what they see and hear.

Mill left the responsibility with the individual.

(Image: John Stuart Mill, c.1858)

S.O.P.P. Civic Literacy Series — Mill(Part 4)Mill believed that a democratic system depends on more than participation.I...
04/30/2026

S.O.P.P. Civic Literacy Series — Mill
(Part 4)

Mill believed that a democratic system depends on more than participation.

It depends on the quality of judgment.

Citizens are often required to evaluate ideas, arguments, and decisions.

This requires more than access to information.

It requires the ability to examine that information critically.

Without this, decisions may be based on repetition, familiarity, or reaction.

Rather than careful consideration.

Mill emphasized that individuals should not simply adopt ideas…
But understand them.

The goal was not agreement.
But informed judgment.

That kind of judgment is learned…
not assumed.

Image: Library of Congress, Prints & Photographs Division, National Child Labor Committee Collection

S.O.P.P. Civic Literacy Series — Mill (Part 3)Mill also warned about a different kind of pressure.Not from government…Bu...
04/29/2026

S.O.P.P. Civic Literacy Series — Mill
(Part 3)

Mill also warned about a different kind of pressure.

Not from government…
But from society itself.

He observed that individuals may hesitate to express their views if they fear social consequences.

Over time, this can lead to conformity.

People may begin to adopt positions not because they believe them…
But because they are widely accepted.

Mill referred to this as a form of social pressure that can shape behavior and thought.

In such conditions, diversity of opinion may appear to exist…
But independent thinking can quietly decline.

The result is not enforced silence…
But voluntary conformity.

Image: Library of Congress (Public Domain)

S.O.P.P. Civic Literacy Series — Mill(Part 2)John Stuart Mill argued that freedom of thought and discussion were essenti...
04/28/2026

S.O.P.P. Civic Literacy Series — Mill
(Part 2)

John Stuart Mill argued that freedom of thought and discussion were essential to a healthy society.

He believed that even unpopular or minority opinions should be allowed to be expressed.

Not because they are always correct…
But because their presence serves a purpose.

If an opinion is true, it deserves to be heard.
If it is false, it can still challenge existing beliefs and strengthen understanding.

Without open discussion, ideas can become accepted without being examined.

Over time, they may be repeated without being fully understood.

Mill warned that when discussion is limited, people may hold beliefs…
But lose the reasoning behind them.

Image: Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division (Public Domain)

S.O.P.P. Civic Literacy Series — Mill(Part 1)In the 19th century, as democratic systems expanded, new questions began to...
04/27/2026

S.O.P.P. Civic Literacy Series — Mill
(Part 1)

In the 19th century, as democratic systems expanded, new questions began to emerge.

Not just about government...

But about the role of the individual within it.

One of the most influential thinkers on this subject was John Stuart Mill.

Mill was not focused on designing government structures.

He focused on something else:

The importance of individual thought.

He believed that a functioning democratic society depended not only on participation…

But on the ability of citizens to think independently.

The question was not simply whether people could vote but whether they could form their own judgments.

This series will explore:

1. Why Mill believed freedom of thought was essential.
2. The role of open discussion in democratic systems.
3. The risks of conformity and social pressure.
4. Why independent judgment matters in public life.

Image: Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division (Public Domain)

Address

Owensboro, KY

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Service Over Power Project posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share

Category