OceanCity2050

Website Contact the organization

OceanCity2050 Our mission is to ensure Ocean City remains a premier family-friendly destination while balancing preservation, development, and sustainability. Why Now?

Ocean City 2050 is a resident-led advocacy group committed to preserving Ocean City’s unique character, promoting responsible growth, and advocating for transparency in local government. Who We Are
Ocean City 2050 is a resident-led advocacy group committed to preserving Ocean City’s unique character, promoting responsible growth, and advocating for transparency in local government. Rising housing costs, environmental threats, unchecked development, and governance issues are threatening our community, yet there has been little proactive leadership to address these challenges in a way that truly protects Ocean City’s future. Too often, decisions have been reactive, short-sighted, or influenced by narrow interests rather than long-term community needs. That’s why we are stepping up—to ensure that Ocean City’s future is shaped by smart, fact-based policies that prioritize residents, not just special interests. Ocean City deserves leadership that looks ahead, safeguards what makes our community special, and ensures we remain a thriving, family-friendly destination for generations to come. Together, we can build a future for Ocean City that works for ALL of us.

Two perspectives on Wonderland’s historic carousel are highlighted in this week’s OC Sentinel: Councilman Tony Polcini a...
10/28/2026

Two perspectives on Wonderland’s historic carousel are highlighted in this week’s OC Sentinel: Councilman Tony Polcini and Mayor Jay Gillian are ready to throw in the towel, citing restoration costs. But, in a letter-to-the-editor, OC2050’s Bill Merritt notes that protecting taxpayers shouldn’t mean giving up on the carousel. Merritt outlines options involving future developers, private donors, and preservation partners.

Broken promises from Eustace Mita shouldn’t mean the end of a historic treasure. Before saying goodbye, let’s explore what’s possible.

https://ocnjsentinel.com/councilman-polcini-time-to-say-goodbye-to-wonderlands-carousel/

https://www.oceancity2050.org/media/find-a-way-to-save-the-carousel-from-wonderland-pier

A few weeks ago, Eustace Mita announced that the Ferris wheel would no longer be part of any venue he created at 600 Boardwalk. His explanation was that its condition had deteriorated and it could no longer operate safely. The public response was predictable: outrage. Mita had promised to incorpora

In 2024, Seaside Heights celebrated the restoration of its historic carousel. A reminder of what’s possible.
10/26/2026

In 2024, Seaside Heights celebrated the restoration of its historic carousel. A reminder of what’s possible.

The restored carousel is named for Dr. Floyd L. Moreland who was instrumental in getting it fixed.

10/23/2026

As the Council comes together behind collaboration and compromise, it’s been heartening to see members like Jody Levchuk get behind a well-considered process for the critical development at 600 Boardwalk. Jody’s comments at this week’s Council meeting show how listening to constituents can change how one sees the issue. After a summer of watching the Boardwalk adjust to life without an anchor at Sixth Street, Jody noted the need to move quickly may no longer be as urgent—and that finding the right project mattered more than rushing into any project. We agree.

“We’ve had a lot of people relaxing on both ends of the [debate] on that topic,” said Councilman Levchuk. “That’s a relief that is allowing Council to do our job.”

Thank you council members for being open to the community and for continuing to move ahead together.

Councilman Keith Hartzell’s recent remarks at the October 22 Council meeting offer reason for cautious optimism about th...
10/23/2026

Councilman Keith Hartzell’s recent remarks at the October 22 Council meeting offer reason for cautious optimism about the future of Wonderland Pier.

Council shared that they are working toward a shared vision for the site that brings together the diverse views of all seven members. Hartzell added that Council is also committed to a public workshop before a final plan is set.

There are still important questions ahead, including how the survey results will be analyzed. But this is a meaningful and a most welcome step from Council in response to residents’ ongoing request for transparency, compromise, and community involvement.

It’s a reminder that residents’ voices matter and that you do make a difference. A thoughtful, open process can help Ocean City honor its history while planning responsibly for the future. Thanks for staying engaged.

Read our full thoughts in our latest email

Councilman Keith Hartzell’s remarks at the October 22 Council meeting about the future of Wonderland Pier offer reason for optimism.

For those looking to stay up to date on city happenings, the Ocean City Council meeting is taking place Thursday, Octobe...
10/21/2026

For those looking to stay up to date on city happenings, the Ocean City Council meeting is taking place Thursday, October 22, 2026, at 5 pm at City Hall. Please note this meeting is scheduled to begin with a closed session in order to interview candidates before Council returns to finish the rest of the meeting agenda. You can learn more at the links below.

AGENDA:https://www.ocnj.us/meetingfiles/96416/agendas/f1b6d29d68534737a7c522cfc51f2ca3.pdf

AGENDA PACKET:https://www.ocnj.us/meetingfiles/96416/attachments/e43ccad6796c4a47a3ba6eeb75d7d704.pdf

In a new Ocean City Sentinel op-ed, OC resident Dave Breeden highlights the conditions the Ocean City Chamber of Commerc...
10/21/2026

In a new Ocean City Sentinel op-ed, OC resident Dave Breeden highlights the conditions the Ocean City Chamber of Commerce set when it originally endorsed Eustace Mita’s plan for 600 Boardwalk in 2025—none of which have been met to date.

Breeden asks, “Is Mita prepared to make the compromises that the Council is seeking, Ocean City residents have been demanding, and the Chamber’s own endorsement—and Pete’s recent reiteration—requires?

Mita must answer that question with action and clarity. Namely:

- Lower the height of this project to something that fits in Ocean City, and then tell us exactly how tall it will be—in feet—not in riddles we are expected to decipher.

- Explain what the public, boardwalk-facing entertainment component will be and how it will drive traffic to and on the Boardwalk.

- Develop a unique and inspiring Ocean City design—not a Del Coronado knockoff.

- And tell us what your plan is for the carousel, which has been trapped and presumably deteriorating for months.”

We agree. A project of this scale should respect Ocean City’s history, character, and residents. Compromise means both sides move—not that the city gives way while the developer gets his way.

At a recent City Council meeting, former council member Pete Madden spoke on behalf of the Ocean City Chamber of Commerce and urged negotiation over the proposed resort at 600 Boardwalk. That was encouraging. But it was also a little surprising coming from someone who has been a steadfast supporter

Is Mr. Eustace Mita truly planning to build in Ocean City—or is he positioning himself to sell? The distinction matters ...
10/15/2026

Is Mr. Eustace Mita truly planning to build in Ocean City—or is he positioning himself to sell? The distinction matters enormously to what our community gets in return.

After much time promoting his project, aggressively pushing for a rehabilitation designation, and a recent media tour to create urgency around deterioration on his property, Mita’s sudden lack of responsiveness and clarity is concerning.

This week’s Ocean City Sentinel reports that Council is still waiting on Mita, who is busy working on other projects, and that his initial answers to Council’s questions have only raised more questions. (https://ocnjsentinel.com/more-questions-than-answers-on-wonderland/)

Taken together with the fact that we have seen nothing for two years except a crayon rendering of his proposed high-rise, Mita is acting more like someone positioning the property for resale than preparing to build. That should concern every Ocean City taxpayer.

When the City permits significantly more development on a property, through something like a redevelopment plan, it substantially increases its land value. Typically, the owner gains valuable development rights and equity value in the land. And in exchange, the community gains enforceable commitments to deliver something desirable that will benefit the City.

But if Mita obtains those rights—and then sells—he can cash out that added gain before doing a single thing for Ocean City. The City would then be negotiating with a new developer whose starting point is a more expensive piece of land.

That ultimately affects the project’s economics, creating additional pressure for more rooms, greater density, fewer public amenities, or another round of concessions to make the higher cost viable.

If Mita sells, the increased value given to him by the rehabilitation designation in good faith by the city, will be lost in the departing owner’s pocket rather than returned to the community as a successful project.

Perhaps, as Mita has promised, he is committed to finding a compromise that works and has no intention of selling. But Council needs to realize the real possibility and its ramifications—and resolve this uncertainty before granting any further valuable new development rights.

As Council stated last meeting, they are waiting for answers from Mita. Is he committed and financially prepared to build? On what timetable? What public benefits will he be obligated to deliver? And what protections will apply if he sells?

The City cannot give Mr. Mita added land value—without securing what Ocean City wants in return.

Before granting that value, make sure we have our builder. Otherwise, Ocean City could create the profit, watch it leave the island, and still be waiting for the project.

10/14/2026

At last week’s City Council meeting, Ocean City resident John Hadam made an important point: Fairness should be a cornerstone of municipal government. His family is spending $10,000 in professional and legal fees just to apply for permission to extend the deck of their historic home by six feet. That’s before they drive in a single nail. If a homeowner must go through that level of scrutiny for a modest variance, a developer seeking a massive zoning change should face even greater scrutiny.

The same principle applies to maintaining property. Wealth does not relieve an owner of the responsibility to care for their land. Nor should allowing a property to deteriorate strengthen the case for granting its owner extraordinary development rights. Neglect should not be a gateway to profit.

Mr. Hadam’s statement also raises a broader question: Why does Ocean City seem to care so little about preserving its history? We should have rules that help people stay in their historic homes. Instead, our rules too often seem to incentivize demolition. Similarly, there appears to be little serious effort to protect what remains of Wonderland’s history. Why are we so willing to treat the places that define our community as disposable?

That history is more than visually important. It contributes to our livability, attracts visitors, supports local businesses, and distinguishes Ocean City from other shore destinations. Preserving it should be part of our economic strategy.

As we move into the next Master Plan review, we should think carefully about how to create rules that support historic preservation, livability, and economic growth together—with fairness as the foundation.

At last night’s City Council meeting, members offered a glimpse into ongoing negotiations over the former Wonderland sit...
10/09/2026

At last night’s City Council meeting, members offered a glimpse into ongoing negotiations over the former Wonderland site, saying they are waiting for answers on key questions about the project’s size, height, and parking from developer Eustace Mita, who is currently out of the country. Councilman Keith Hartzell also reminded the audience that while they are waiting on input from the developer, Council, in parallel, is crafting the City’s own redevelopment plan for the parcel, and hoped to complete their work on that in the next 30 to 60 days. They again reiterated that they are united in moving forward on a plan that all seven Council members can agree on.

Resident Alan Richter thanked Council for seeking a unanimous decision on the site, going on to share a heartfelt request to hold a town hall meeting seeking public input before any agreement is finalized. “My motivation is…my granddaughter,” said Richter, holding up a photo. “She absolutely loves the Ocean City Boardwalk. She’s the seventh generation of my family to love the Ocean City Boardwalk and my motivation is to see the Boardwalk evolve in a way that she will still love the Boardwalk for the rest of her life, and god willing, the life of her children and grandchildren.”

He added that involving the public was not only about transparency, trust, and good will, but also about hearing all perspectives and ideas before the plan is a done deal—ultimately resulting in a smoother and more efficient process for everyone.

For those interested in more on the discussion, the OCNJ Daily has a helpful write up at https://ocnjdaily.com/news/government/city-council-asks-for-patience-in-negotiating-boardwalk-hotel-agreement/. You can also view the Council meeting at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dSKCOTuXwO0.

Address

Ocean City, NJ
08226

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when OceanCity2050 posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Organization

Send a message to OceanCity2050:

Shortcuts

Share