02/21/2026
GOOD NEWS!
The City Planning Commission voted on February 19, 2026 to designate parcel ED-6 and the Three Bends area as ‘natural and open space” in the City’s 20 year Comprehensive Plan.
Natural and open space definition: “This designation preserves environmentally sensitive areas, natural landscapes, and recreational green spaces that contribute to ecological health and community well-being. These areas may include protected forests, wetlands, flood plains, and public parks.”
While this is great news, it may not be as solid as it seems. This changes the planning document, but that document is really a statement of intent, not a binding restriction. It should mean the City backs away from its intentions to develop those areas IF THE CITY ACQUIRED THEM. (The City got ahead of itself with plans before it had possession.)
That does not mean the two parcels are out of danger from development. DOE OWNS THE LAND. So right now DOE calls the shots on what happens in the future. The DOE could keep the land and not release it to anyone and it would likely stay the way it is. It could GIVE it to the City, and if the City kept its word, it would remain undeveloped. It could sell it on the open market to the highest bidder. It is likely the City would neither have the money to buy the land, nor the interest in doing so, if it could not be developed. In that case, whoever bought it might be able to do whatever they wanted unless the DOE put restrictions on the sale, or if the City was able to regulate the land use by zoning or some other method. If developers were faced with the uncertainty of their ability to develop either parcel, there might be no bidders and the land would stay untouched.
Where does that leave things? This is speculation, not fact, but worth thinking about.
Residents could continue to lobby the City Council to lock in the designation now in the Plan with more concrete actions like a resolution by the City itself. The City cannot zone DOE owned land.
Residents should express to DOE the same opinions they expressed to the City about protecting the land. That would include urging DOE to lock in the “natural and open space” designation along with its definition as being part of any land transfer to any party. Putting that restriction in a deed is pretty good insurance. Another alternative is to ask DOE to transfer the land only to an entity such as a land conservancy who would agree to keep it in conservation status with light recreation.
Continue to speak up to the authorities until some definitive protection is in place.
Send a message to learn more