Human Rights in China - 中国人权

Human Rights in China - 中国人权 Human Rights in China is a Chinese non-governmental organization founded in March 1989 by overseas Chinese students and scientists.

On 1 July, retired Wuhan activist Zhang Yi (张毅) was visiting Sera Monastery in Lhasa when he tried to speak with a Tibet...
08/19/2026

On 1 July, retired Wuhan activist Zhang Yi (张毅) was visiting Sera Monastery in Lhasa when he tried to speak with a Tibetan woman who did not know Mandarin. He showed her a photo of a Han Chinese Buddhist monk standing beside the Dalai Lama, and she immediately looked away.

Minutes later, Zhang was detained. On July 18, he was placed in criminal detention on suspicion of “inciting separatism,” and his arrest was later approved.

This alleged act of incitement was not a speech, protest, publication, or attempt to persuade anyone to support Tibetan independence. It was showing a photo. The charge of “separatism” has become extraordinarily elastic in Tibet, now broad enough to criminalize not only political organizing, but religious symbolism, private communication, and ordinary human contact.

The woman’s fear is also telling. She understood that merely looking at the wrong image was dangerous. Repression is most effective when it does not require police at every interaction, but instead causes people to police themselves.

For Zhang’s son, Zhang Hongyuan (张宏远), now in the Netherlands, this arrest follows decades of pressure on his family. Zhang Yi was imprisoned after participating in protests in Wuhan following the 1989 Tiananmen crackdown and later endured surveillance, repeated summons, and detention for continuing to associate with civil-society figures and political prisoners.

His son admits that, growing up, he sometimes resented him. While other fathers concentrated on their careers and home lives, Zhang Yi kept getting involved in the suffering of others, even when the resulting repression damaged his family’s security. Only later did Zhang Hongyuan understand his father’s refusal to do nothing. As he put it, “many people only realize that someone has always been resisting on their behalf when the iron fist finally smashes into their own interests.”

Read more about the Story of Zhang Yi and His Son, from 1989 to today, on our Substack — Link in Bio

STATEMENT: Human Rights in China (HRIC) strongly condemns the Chinese government’s decision to sanction our organization...
08/05/2026

STATEMENT: Human Rights in China (HRIC) strongly condemns the Chinese government’s decision to sanction our organization. This action is a blatant act of retaliation against entities working to ensure that international trade and commerce are not tainted by forced labor and other serious human rights abuses. It is another attempt by the Chinese government to intimidate and silence organizations that advocate for universal human rights and corporate accountability.

While we were surprised to find HRIC included alongside organizations we were previously unfamiliar with, we regard this designation as a badge of honor. It demonstrates that our work has had an impact and that the Chinese government recognizes the importance of independent human rights advocacy. HRIC is proud to be the only human rights organization included on this sanctions list.

Ironically, for many people inside China’s Great Firewall, this announcement may be the first time they have encountered Human Rights in China.

Founded in March 1989 by overseas Chinese students and scientists, Human Rights in China has worked for 37 years to support and strengthen civil society through the promotion of internationally recognized human rights and the rule of law in China. Our staff bring decades of expertise in human rights law, Chinese politics, language, and culture. We have stood with the Tiananmen Mothers and countless other victims of political persecution, documenting abuses, advocating for accountability, and amplifying the voices of those whom the Chinese government seeks to silence.

No sanctions imposed by the Chinese government will deter us from our mission. On the contrary, this action underscores the importance of our work. HRIC will continue to stand with human rights defenders, support victims of persecution, and advocate for a China where the rights and dignity of every person are respected.

HRIC Executive Director Zhou Fengsuo has given an in-depth interview to Investigative Journalism Reportika to speak on T...
07/29/2026

HRIC Executive Director Zhou Fengsuo has given an in-depth interview to Investigative Journalism Reportika to speak on Tiananmen Square, AI-powered surveillance, transnational repression, and China’s democratic future.

As a student leader in 1989 who was imprisoned after the June Fourth crackdown, Zhou explains why historical memory remains one of the Party’s deepest anxieties. The movement showed that millions of Chinese citizens openly demanded democracy and constitutional government, shattering the myth that the Chinese people neither want nor are ready for it. Memory is dangerous to dictators because it reminds people that change is possible.

He also warns that the convergence of dictatorship and artificial intelligence may be the defining question of this century. AI is already reinforcing censorship, surveillance, and social control inside China, and those capabilities are being exported. Whether AI empowers individuals or concentrates power in the hands of regimes will depend on the safeguards democracies build now.

On transnational repression, Zhou notes that Chinese dissidents have long been the first targets, and that protecting them is inseparable from defending the sovereignty of democratic societies themselves.

Access the Full Interview on our Substack — Link in Bio

While crowds streamed into the Hong Kong Book Fair on July 15, elsewhere in the city, national security police and custo...
07/17/2026

While crowds streamed into the Hong Kong Book Fair on July 15, elsewhere in the city, national security police and customs officers raided two independent bookshops, seizing novels and arresting five people for alleged sedition.

It is a bleak contrast. While the government made a public show of celebrating books, it was simultaneously punishing booksellers for what they placed on their shelves.

Hong Kong officials have also refused to specify which books are illegal. This uncertainty does much of the censoring work for them—fear sparked by one arrest prompts other shops to preemptively remove unbanned novels.

What disappears is not only a business, but the freedom to compare conflicting accounts of the past and encounter ideas that the government rejects, reaching independent conclusions. With every missing book, the horizon of what Hongkongers can know, question, and imagine grows narrower.

Read More on our LinkedIn — Link in Bio

Recently released Pastor Ezra Jin Mingri of Zion Church has safely arrived in Los Angeles, United States, reuniting with...
07/08/2026

Recently released Pastor Ezra Jin Mingri of Zion Church has safely arrived in Los Angeles, United States, reuniting with his family.

This case has drawn global attention and marks a significant milestone for religious freedom in China. However, the fight is far from over. The Chinese government must immediately release all pastors and believers wrongfully detained, drop the unfounded charges against them, and stop the harassment, surveillance, banning, and criminalization of house churches.

Let Pastor Ezra Jin’s success serve as a reminder to the international community that sustained attention and continued advocacy remain essential.

Read More on our LinkedIn — Link in Bio

On June 26, 2026, a single-engine aircraft struck Beijing’s tallest building: CITIC Tower, better known as China Zun (中国...
07/08/2026

On June 26, 2026, a single-engine aircraft struck Beijing’s tallest building: CITIC Tower, better known as China Zun (中国尊), in the capital’s central business district. Images show a hole in the glass wall, debris falling, and the area being evacuated as emergency services arrived.

The next day, Chaoyang district authorities confirmed that the pilot had died and 13 people were injured. But they provided no cause and did not name China Zun. Reuters also reported that police ordered bystanders to stop filming, deleted images from witnesses’ phones, and that all related posts were later scrubbed from Chinese social media.

Censorship in China is not only about banning criticism of the CCP, it is about controlling the first version of reality. What the public eventually receives, if anything, is the Party’s authorized substitute for the actual events that occurred.

The end result is a society where people are trained to doubt even what they have seen with their own eyes.

Read More on our LinkedIn — Link in Bio

On June 23, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Doe that federal courts may not hear human righ...
07/08/2026

On June 23, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Doe that federal courts may not hear human rights claims under the Alien Tort Statute (ATS) and, separately, that aiding-and-abetting claims are not actionable under the Torture Victim Protection Act (TVPA).

A major shift in U.S. human rights litigation has occurred: In 2000, Human Rights in China assisted Zhou Fengsuo, now Executive Director of HRIC, to bring a case against Li Peng in New York under the aforementioned statutes for his role in the Tiananmen Square Massacre.

This decision will significantly restrict victims’ options to seek accountability from actors who assist foreign governments in carrying out human rights abuses.

Read More on Our Substack — Link in Bio

Yiyan “Gaukas” Wang has been unreachable for nearly two years.According to friends and colleagues, Wang returned to Chin...
07/02/2026

Yiyan “Gaukas” Wang has been unreachable for nearly two years.

According to friends and colleagues, Wang returned to China in mid-2024, and contact with him ceased shortly afterwards, leaving his whereabouts and legal status unknown.

Wang is a University of Colorado Boulder PhD student whose research sat at the intersection of cybersecurity, open-source infrastructure, academic inquiry, and state censorship.

The PRC has never treated information as a neutral domain. Following the 1989 Tiananmen Square Massacre, and more explicitly under Xi Jinping’s “holistic national security” framework, uncontrolled communication has been understood as a political vulnerability. Wang’s case thus has implications for anyone whose work touches on China’s censorship, data, or security systems.

Wang’s website reportedly displayed a phrase from China’s first international email connection in 1987: “Across the Great Wall we can reach every corner in the world.”

That sentence once expressed the optimism of an open, connected world. Wang’s disappearance points to today’s harsh reality: in modern China, the politics of connection remain inseparable from the politics of control.

HRIC calls on the Chinese authorities to disclose Wang’s location, allow contact with family and legal counsel if he is being held, and ensure his safety.

Read More on our Substack — Link in Bio

On the 37th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square Massacre, X user JapanBanZaiLove posted an art piece of Japanese train t...
06/10/2026

On the 37th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square Massacre, X user JapanBanZaiLove posted an art piece of Japanese train tickets spelling out “北京天安门” (Beijing Tiananmen) alongside repeated references to “6·4”—the date the Chinese military violently suppressed the 1989 pro-democracy movement, turning its weapons on unarmed civilians.

The artwork contained no slogans, no graphic imagery, no calls for protest, and no direct criticism of the Chinese government. Yet, shortly afterwards, the account was reportedly suspended, and the image disappeared.

This episode raises the question: if one of the world’s most prominent platforms for public debate cannot host indirect references to June 4, what does that mean for the preservation of historical truth outside of China? As discussion of Tiananmen becomes increasingly restricted within the PRC, a growing share of its public memory survives through archives, journalists, artists, researchers, and digital platforms overseas.

The extraordinary resources devoted to suppressing references to Tiananmen Square suggest that, all these years later, it remains one of the most politically sensitive subjects connected to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), one the Party seeks to erase entirely.

Thus, images such as these, no matter how fleeting, are important. They serve as a reminder that memory does not survive only through monuments, museums, or official commemoration. Sometimes it survives through a handful of train tickets.

HRIC Executive Director Fengsuo Zhou was among the last protesters to leave Tiananmen Square. As the People’s Liberation...
06/05/2026

HRIC Executive Director Fengsuo Zhou was among the last protesters to leave Tiananmen Square. As the People’s Liberation Army turned against unarmed civilian protesters, many of them students, he remembers hearing gunfire echo across the city, watching tanks advance, and later seeing hospitals overwhelmed with the dead and wounded.

June 4th is not only a story about what happened in 1989; it is also a story about everything that has happened since.

For 37 years, the Chinese government has devoted enormous resources to erasing the Tiananmen Massacre: censoring discussion, imprisoning those who commemorate it, harassing the grieving families of victims, and suppressing historical truth.

It has not worked.

The memory endures in the Tiananmen Mothers, who have spent decades seeking accountability for children the state still refuses to acknowledge. It endures in Xu Guang (徐光), who emerged from four years of imprisonment so weakened by abuse and force-feeding he could barely stand, yet still declared the struggle must continue. It lives on in Yin Xu’an (尹旭安), sentenced to 4 years simply for commemoration activities, then disappeared again for refusing silence. It endures in D**g Guangping (董广平), a former police officer who sacrificed his freedom, repeatedly, to speak publicly about the massacre. It lives on in Chow Hang-tung (鄒幸彤), who turned a Hong Kong courtroom into a platform for remembrance after public commemoration was outlawed.

And it lives on in General Xu Qinxian (徐勤先), commander of the PLA’s elite 38th Army, who refused orders to enforce martial law against his own citizens. He did not wish, he said, to become “a criminal in history.” Even inside the machine, someone refused.

The students, workers, journalists, intellectuals, and ordinary citizens who filled Beijing’s streets in 1989 did not achieve the democratic future they sought. But decades later, others continue their work in prison cells, courtrooms, exile communities, churches, classrooms, and private homes.

The tanks have long since left Tiananmen Square. The responsibility to remember, and keep fighting, remains.

See the Full Commemoration Speech on our Youtube Channel - Link in Bio

Address

New York, NY

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Human Rights in China - 中国人权 posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Organization

Send a message to Human Rights in China - 中国人权:

Shortcuts

Share