Trap Free Montana

Call Website Contact the organization

Trap Free Montana 501(c)(3) Connecting hearts and minds through science, truths in trapping, & compassion for wildlife. Despite the mantra, trapping is far from regulated.

Trap Free Montana is a charitable nonprofit 501(c)(3) comprised of diverse wildlife supporters. Our 501(c)(4) affiliate is Trap Free Montana Public Lands (TFMPL). We are a grassroots boots on the ground nonprofit originating in 2015 from our 2014 ballot initiative attempt for Trap Free Montana Public Lands (TFMPL). Our page and social media sites have operated under TFMPL, but Trap Free Montana has become the dominant work horse and warranted the name change on the social media platforms. Early on, Montanans coined us as "Trap Free", interchangeably, for both our organizations. Trap Free Montana's mission is to connect people's heart and mind through the best available science, truths in trapping, and compassion to rise to the plight of wildlife and support biodiversity, coexistence, responsible stewardship, and trap free public lands. Trap Free Montana helps pay for medical bills for trapped animals, provides assistance with non-lethal methods, advocates for wildlife, educates the public about the truths in trapping and it's secreted hidden dangers, plus offers rewards for information leading to trapping violation arrests and convictions. We are most popularly known for our billboard campaign along major highways across the state as well as being a consistent participant over the years at Montana Fish and Wildlife meetings and along with TFMPL, legislative hearings. Unfortunately, the war declared on wolves, in particular, and the increased muting of our voices against trapping has forced us to litigate. As a 501(c)(4), TFMPL focuses on trapping reform and trap free public lands more through the legislative process. TFMPL tracks trapping bills and keeps a report card on Montana legislators voting record regarding trapping and related bills for the public's awareness and voting knowledge. TFMPL had two trapping related bills in the 2019 Montana legislative session. One for 24hr/daily trap checks and the other for mandatory trapper education. https://tfmpl.org/

Within our beautiful state, Montana has one of the worst trapping grades in the country. Annually, trapping takes a cruel and unethical toll on tens thousands of indiscriminate animals. Meanwhile, trappers pay a pittance to our Montana Fish, Wildlife, and Parks department or nothing at all while indiscriminately destroying and profiting off our wildlife. Trappers are not held accountable or responsible for the trapped "non-targets" including rare, threatened, and protected species. That includes trapping your dog. To help us and stay abreast of trapping news, particularly for Montana, sign up for our e-news and action alerts: https://trapfreemt.org/sign-up

Please note our websites are being updated. Trap Free Montana, Inc. PO Box 335
Hamilton Montana 59840
Email [email protected]
http://www.trapfreemt.org
406-218-1170 Thank You!

ALERT: BUYER BEWARE DO NOT BE FOOLED MONTANA WOLF ADVOCATES! Idaho based "nonprofit", Foundation for Wildlife Management...
10/16/2026

ALERT: BUYER BEWARE DO NOT BE FOOLED MONTANA WOLF ADVOCATES!
Idaho based "nonprofit", Foundation for Wildlife Management (F4WM) has a really good gig going based on emotions, falsehoods, and now deceptive advertising with a Montana wolf design license plate in order to raise more money for bounties to kill more wolves in Montana and Idaho.

First off their name, Foundation for Wildlife Management. How is paying a bounty of $1,000, $1500, and $2,000 per dead wolf with receipts for outdoor clothing, gas, or truck payments, a foundation to manage wildlife?

Where is the science supporting ~ 157,000 elk in Montana, ~60,000 over management objectives, and only amongst maybe 600-800 wolves as a sound foundation for wildlife management? What other species under FWP and Fish & Game agencies have as their foundation to manage wildlife that includes killing the young of the year, including newborns, shooting over bait, trapping, snaring, night hunting with infrared and thermal, killing year-round, the utilization of domestic canines, aerial gunning, and collecting $1,000, $1500, and $2,000 per animal, after the kill? Aka, a bounty. What wildlife biology program teaches this for wildlife management, as ours certainly did not?

Secondly, how does F4WM receive over a million dollars in donations? By eliciting a highly emotional and very profitable response in promoting utter falsehoods to these states with high numbers of elk hunters, i.e. "Save the Elk", because "Wolves are decimating all the elk," ----"Wolves must be managed." Disgruntled and passionate elk hunters both likely fall for it. The over a million dollars in contributions speaks for itself.

The F4WM and their supporters also neglect to disclose states like Idaho and Montana have tens of thousands more elk today then when wolves were returned 30 years ago. Montana, for example, has ~ 157,000 elk in comparison to 90,000-95,000 when wolves returned, but, shh, it's a secret worthy of staying tight-lipped over.

F4WM further embellishes their powerful myths, by claiming how many big game they saved by the killing and bounty paying of a wolf. They withhold the success rate of a wolf kill is only 3-14% and that is generally with the pack. Whereas, the average elk hunter success rate in Montana is around 20%.

F4WM evades telling that the number of elk killed annually by wolves are estimated at 16-20 elk and omits that it is commonly with other pack members. Devoid in their propaganda, hunters in Montana kill on average 25,000 elk annually. There are more than enough big game for humans and wolves in Montana, Idaho, and Wyoming. Research findings are wolves target older, weaker, sickly prey and help keep their natural prey, such as elk, strong and healthy.

Of course, F4WM excludes the fact that wolves evolved with elk long before we were on the landscape and wolves hunting elk are not without significant risk of injury, even death. Wolves fail far more often in the hunt then they succeed.

Furthermore, F4WM falsely makes the claim of all the big game and livestock they saved, 426,000, by killing the wolf over a wolf's "7-year" life span. Yet, wolves inside protected areas like Yellowstone National Park average life is about 4 to 5 years, while wolves living outside the park face high human-caused mortality and average living only 2 to 3 years. Let the findings show in Montana 2025, we had almost 500,000 deer, and wolves killed .003% of the over 2 million cattle and sheep.

F4WM represses acknowledging the highly social workings of wolves. They ignore the impacts of the surviving wolves in the packs' ability to successfully hunt and especially related to the very wolves they killed, i.e. their age, status, role, and the pack size. Never mind, the harm caused in the killing of a dispersing or a collared wolf. Instead, they celebrate, fabricate, and profit off the kills.

F4WM does not expose the lengthy elk hunting seasons, damage control elk hunts, that elk are hunted in Montana 6-months out of the year and that the Montana legislature mandated a reduction in the elk population in our state. It would completely contradict their highly effective and profitable scam.

Why tell the facts, when you have a great lucrative scheme going?

Now their last trick. Create a wolf license plate in Montana, although they are Idaho based, and raise funds off it. How? By making the entire license plate that of a wolf. Who is going to buy it? Those, unknowingly, who care and/or love wolves. They will not know the full size image of a wolf on their vehicle funds the $1,000-$2,000 bounties to kill wolves.

F4WM website claims, they have paid for 75% of the wolves killed in Idaho and 55% of Montana’s wolf kills each season. F4WM writes, "We have helped remove 3,049+ wolves with just over $3.2 million in membership and sponsor funds." They lack the nerve to even say, kill. You remove your shoes. You do not remove wolves.

One cannot help but wonder if karma will take a big juicy bite out of anti-wolfers who do purchase the plate to support F4WM, and "accidentally' or intentionally have their vehicle vandalized by the naive vengeful other anti-wolfers. Wolf advocates often avoid publicly displaying their support of wolves due to fear and retaliation.

If F4WM were to show one iota of integrity, they would have put a bullseye on the wolf like many anti-wolfers and trappers have done in the past. That, or depicted a wolf with blood stained baring teeth as their go to image.

Do not be fooled by these tactics!
Pass it on!
Please SHARE.
Montanans, DO NOT Buy this license plate that funds bounties to kill wolves in our state and Idaho! Tell your family and friends.


Here is a good rundown from our wolf hearings on Oct 13 in the 9th Circuit of Appeals in federal court in Missoula.Trap ...
10/14/2026

Here is a good rundown from our wolf hearings on Oct 13 in the 9th Circuit of Appeals in federal court in Missoula.

Trap Free Montana is a plaintiff in the Western Watersheds Project's coalition concerning the USFWS's failure to relist wolves in the Northern Rocky Mountains. We are represented by Matt Bishop with Western Environmental Law Center. Matt did a great job!

The panel of judges asked a number of questions of the attorneys. Some notable responses were stated during the hearings both in favor of wolf protections, and against.

Now we wait and hope that the judges support the 105-page in depth ruling in our favor by Judge Molloy in August 2025, which is packed with scientific integrity. This could easily be applicable to other wolves, too, and we hope for their successful outcome, as well.

Thank you to all the wolf advocates who showed up, especially from afar. It was great seeing the many familiar faces and meeting a couple of new ones. In contrast, the trappers and anti-wolfers were lacking in attendance.

Appellate justices are mulling over two cases that could determine whether or which gray wolves are protected in the lower 48 states.

SHOW UP for a half day tomorrow in Missoula, Montana for wolves across the U.S! Show the court just how important wolves...
10/12/2026

SHOW UP for a half day tomorrow in Missoula, Montana for wolves across the U.S! Show the court just how important wolves are to us and their rightful role on the landscape!

If you cannot attend these hearings, tune in and watch the hearings live from 9:30 to ~12:30MST. https://bit.ly/4e5fSNu
So much is at stake tomorrow for wolves in the United States!

Our case regarding relisting gray wolves in the Northern Rockies is now last.

A shout out to the three plaintiff coalitions fighting along with Trap Free Montana for the gray wolves in the Northern Rocky Mountains region who are being aggressively, unethically managed, and lacking the best available science.

-Coalition 1 (Represented by the Western Environmental Law Center): Includes Western Watersheds Project, Trap Free Montana, WildEarth Guardians, Alliance for the Wild Rockies, International Wildlife Coexistence Network, Predator Defense, Protect the Wolves, Wilderness Watch, Friends of the Clearwater, and Nimiipuu Protecting the Environment.

-Coalition 2 : The Center for Biological Diversity, the Humane Society of the United States, and the Sierra Club.

-Coalition 3: Animal Wellness Action, the Center for a Humane Economy, Project Coyote, Footloose Montana, the Gallatin Wildlife Association, and the Kettle Range Conservation Group.

THREE WOLF CASES. ONE IMPORTANT DAY IN COURT. 🐺The Future of Wolves Is at StakeOn Tuesday, October 13, three important w...
10/08/2026

THREE WOLF CASES. ONE IMPORTANT DAY IN COURT. 🐺

The Future of Wolves Is at Stake

On Tuesday, October 13, three important wolf-related cases are scheduled to be heard before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Missoula, Montana.

🐺 CASE 1: MEXICAN GRAY WOLVES
With fewer than 400 Mexican gray wolves living in the wild in the United States, every wolf matters. Conservationists are appealing a ruling involving the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's designation of the Mexican gray wolf population as a nonessential experimental population under the Endangered Species Act.

🐺 CASE 2: NORTHERN ROCKY MOUNTAINS GRAY WOLVES
Trap Free Montana and numerous conservation plaintiffs prevailed in federal district court in a challenge concerning federal protections for gray wolves in the Northern Rockies. In their denial to relist them, the court then ordered USFWS back to the drawing board and to apply the best available science. USFWS is appealing. The coalition that includes Trap Free Montana is represented by the Western Environmental Law Center (WELC). We look forward to seeing our supporters on Tuesday in Missoula at the hearing!

🐺 CASE 3: GRAY WOLVES ELSEWHERE
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is appealing a ruling that restored federal Endangered Species Act protections for gray wolves across much of the contiguous United States outside the Northern Rocky Mountain population where they are delisted and are aggressively managed.

These cases have important implications for wolf conservation and the future of federal protections.

πŸ“ JOIN US IN MISSOULA!
Russell E. Smith Federal Courthouse
201 E. Broadway St.
Room 300
Missoula, Montana

πŸ“… Tuesday, October 13, 2026
⏰ 9:30 a.m. Mountain Time

Can’t make it in person? You can stream the live court broadcast directly: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FFUJrpU91EI

In addition: Please be advised there was no wolf hearing in Montana on October 6. Trap Free Montana are intervenors on a case and along with others would have been involved had there been. This was simply a scheduling conference for dates, deadlines, and a timeline to be set for court cases.

πŸ“£ Please share this post and help spread the word!
Wolves need our support. Their future matters. πŸΊπŸ’š

Fox, cat, dog, or coyote in trouble?  Does it matter? All know fear, pain, and suffering.Yet, there are those who take g...
10/07/2026

Fox, cat, dog, or coyote in trouble? Does it matter? All know fear, pain, and suffering.

Yet, there are those who take great pleasure in killing countless coyotes, and by any sick means possible, every chance they get. Fox are not necessary spared either. Heck, some will shoot a dog or cat seen on their property. Then there are those, who help the animals, regardless of species.

What do you think Montana legally permits for these species, ie, fox, dog, cat, and coyote?

Hope this coyote pulls through and has a wonderful, long, and healthy life back in the wilds.

Thank you to those who care and help animals in need!

A Pennsylvania wildlife center got a call from a woman who was trying to catch a cat but instead caught a fox or dog.

Coloradoans, do not fall for the word play, i.e. "traditional" methods. "Hunting and fishing are already legal in Colora...
10/07/2026

Coloradoans, do not fall for the word play, i.e. "traditional" methods.

"Hunting and fishing are already legal in Colorado. This amendment does not protect a right people do not already have. It opens the door to methods Coloradans rejected decades ago." ----Trapping!

There is a very good reason, they do not include the word "trapping" in these ongoing proposed constitutional amendment rights across the states, Montana included. They know people oppose trapping.

However, a number of other states have pulled off this deceit to unknowing voters, who supported hunting and fishing, so the name-game ploy and fear mongering works and continues.

Coloradoans, do not be fooled and VOTE NO on AMENDMENT 83.
Educate others!

π•π¨π­πž 𝐍𝐎 𝐨𝐧 π€π¦πžπ§ππ¦πžπ§π­ πŸ–πŸ‘.

On November 3, Colorado voters will see an amendment that would put a constitutional right to hunt, fish, and harvest wildlife β€œπ›π² 𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐝𝐒𝐭𝐒𝐨𝐧𝐚π₯ π¦πžπ­π‘π¨ππ¬β€ into the state constitution. β€œTraditional methods” is not defined anywhere in the ballot language. Proponents kept that phrase vague. That is the problem.

Colorado voters already banned steel-jawed leghold traps, body-crushing traps, snares, and poisons on public land in 1996. In 1992, voters banned the spring bear hunt, bear baiting, and hunting bears with hounds, because a sow killed in spring often leaves cubs that do not survive. Amendment 83 does not mention any of that. It just creates a new constitutional right built on an undefined term.

People pushing this measure are already talking about bringing traps back and reopening spring bear hunting. If β€œtraditional methods” is locked into the constitution, those fights move from the ballot box into court, and a later legislature or wildlife commission has a much harder time saying no.

Hunting and fishing are already legal in Colorado. This amendment does not protect a right people do not already have. It opens the door to methods Coloradans rejected decades ago.

Vote NO on 83. Then share this. Text a friend who hunts, hikes, or just cares what happens on public land. Ask them to vote no and pass it on.

We are handing out flyers and yard signs next week. Sign up to get your flyers and signs here:
https://prairieprotectioncolorado.dm.networkforgood.com/forms/sign-up-to-distribute-yard-signs

ALERT! Potential poison, Helena, Montana, left along walking path Centennial park.UPDATE: the dog who ingested some of t...
10/06/2026

ALERT! Potential poison, Helena, Montana, left along walking path Centennial park.
UPDATE: the dog who ingested some of the rat poison had to be treated for a few days at the vet clinic.

This.
10/05/2026

This.

10/03/2026

When is the outcome for mule deer and more going to be based predominantly on a biological construct for the health of the species and the environment? Therefore, for the creatures themselves, rather than for special interests, and at the long-term detriment of the animals?

Address

Hamilton, MT

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Trap Free Montana posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Organization

Send a message to Trap Free Montana:

Share