Rocky Mountain Wolf Project

Rocky Mountain Wolf Project Working together for wolves and people WORKING TOGETHER FOR WOLVES AND PEOPLE. We disseminate science-based information, engage people, and cultivate enthusiasm.

The Rocky Mountain Wolf Project aims to improve public understanding of gray wolf behavior, ecology, and options for re-establishing the species throughout the Rocky Mountains. The benchmark of our success: Wolves again roaming the snow-capped peaks, rim rock canyons, and primeval forests of the Rockies. We engage in thoughtful collaboration, rooted in science.

The adult female wolf (2310) of the King Mountain Pack was shot by a ranch hand, according to a ranch owner in northwest...
06/02/2026

The adult female wolf (2310) of the King Mountain Pack was shot by a ranch hand, according to a ranch owner in northwestern Colorado, as reported by the The Coloradoan (link in comments*). According to a Colorado Parks and Wildlife news release** on March 13, her collar sent a mortality signal on March 11. The incident remains under investigation.

The lethal take of wolves "in the act" of attacking livestock is legal under both the USFWS 10(j) rule (non-essential experimental population designation)*** and the CPW regulations,**** provided that it is immediately reported and investigated, and that evidence indicates the wolf was indeed "in the act" of attacking.

From the USFWS 10(j) rule:
"Consistent with State or Tribal requirements, any landowner may take (injure or kill) a gray wolf in the act of attacking (wounding, harassing, molesting, or killing) livestock or working dogs on their private land. Any wolf taken in the act must be reported to the Service or our designated agent within 24 hours. We will allow additional reasonable time if access to the site is limited. The carcass of any wolf taken and surrounding area must not be disturbed in order to preserve physical evidence that the livestock or working dogs were recently attacked by a wolf or wolves. The Service or our designated agent must be able to confirm that the livestock or dog were wounded, harassed, molested, or killed by a wolf or wolves. The taking of any wolf without such evidence may be referred to the appropriate authorities for prosecution. This exception to the prohibition on take does not apply if there is evidence of unusual attractants or artificial or intentional feeding."

(Note that 10(j) rules are for reintroduced populations. Had wolves returned to Colorado on their own, they would be fully protected under the ESA, and killing one would be illegal even if it were attacking livestock.)

The greatest enemy of fear is fact. Yep, wolves could kill you if they wanted to, but they just don't often lean that wa...
05/25/2026

The greatest enemy of fear is fact. Yep, wolves could kill you if they wanted to, but they just don't often lean that way. That's why wolves became our companions and eventually became dogs.

"How are you able to remove wolf pups from the den without getting attacked by their parents”?

We get this question quite often as well as general questions about how we stay safe while studying wolves. E.g., we have been asked if we carry guns for our safety from wolves more times than we can count. So we figured we would share a bit about how we view staying safe from wolves in the field.

The short answer: we are not exaggerating when we say have no concern whatsoever about wolves attacking us because wolves simply are not a threat to our safety because they really don’t want anything to do with us.

And if anyone should get attacked by wolves or concerned about being attacked, it should be us given our work. Let us elaborate.

We have visited active wolf dens and tagged pups every spring for over a decade. We often see or hear adult wolves at dens while doing this work. Yet, we have not had a single evenly remotely concerning or aggressive encounter with an adult wolf while doing this.

If there was any time an adult wolf would have a motive for attacking and killing people, it would be when visiting a den and handling their pups. Think about what would happen if you grabbed a bear cub in front of its mom?

On a similar vein, we spend much of our year studying wolf predation, hiking into recent kills by ourselves to document the kills. Sometimes, especially during winter, this means we get to kills while the carcass is very fresh, sometimes steaming and warm because it occurred an hour or two ago.

In such instances, wolves are undoubtedly somewhere very close by and well aware of our presence. If disturbing a wolf’s kill is what triggers an attack—the kind of things we read about online and see portrayed on TV— then we definitely should have been attacked by now. Yet, we have never had a wolf so much as approach us when checking out their kills (and we have documented a few thousand kills in the past 12 years).

Furthermore, we have had 6-8 people in the field most days of the year visiting areas GPS-collared wolves spend time. We know from our GPS-collar data that we are frequently close (25-200 m) to collared wolves when in the field. And we are typically spending most of our time in the very areas wolves like to spend time!

If being in close proximity to wolves on a frequent basis is what increases the odds of getting attacked, then someone on our project should have been attacked by now. This is especially true because we do almost all of our fieldwork solo because it is most efficient.

And yet, despite all of this and many years of intensive fieldwork, we have not had a single even remotely concerning encounter. This does not mean we have not had close encounters with wolves. We have had over a hundred at least.

But a close encounter where the wolf does not immediately flee does not mean the wolf is being aggressive or showing a lack of fear. Sometimes wolves, like most other animals, are just curious or inquisitive. Instead of being afraid in such moments, we just savor such rare moments and take it in.

Now, these are just our experiences but the data across North America only substantiates our assessment here. There are literally millions of people across North America who hike, camp, and live in wolf country and yet wolf attacks are almost unheard of.

Sure, there have been a few EXTREMELY rare instances where wolves have threatened or attacked people but this is also true of white-tailed deer—in fact there are far more white-tailed deer attacks on people than wolves. Interestingly, though, no one we know regards deer as a threat to human safety (outside of vehicle collisions).

NOTE: if you value our educational content, please help us continue to create it by donating to our annual fundraiser at the link in the comments. Your donations make this kind of content possible—without donor support, our project quite literally would not be able to continue. By donating you support our research and outreach efforts!

Coexistence is possible . . . props to our colleagues at Voyageurs Wolf Project!
05/25/2026

Coexistence is possible . . . props to our colleagues at Voyageurs Wolf Project!

05/17/2026

Today, on Endangered Species Day, Team Wolf’s Chief Scientist, Dr. Peter Kareiva, had a letter published in The Wall Street Journal making one thing clear:

Wolves are not driving America’s cattle crisis.

In response to a WSJ editorial suggesting that weakening Endangered Species Act protections for wolves could help lower beef costs, Dr. Kareiva pointed to the data: wolf kills account for less than 0.01% of livestock losses nationwide. The leading causes of cattle death are disease, weather, calving complications, digestive problems, and other non-predator factors—not wolves.

Yes, wolves can kill cattle. When that happens, ranchers should be fairly compensated. But using wolves as a scapegoat for high beef prices ignores the real forces affecting ranchers and consumers.

Marc Roston’s follow-up letter sharpened the point even further: the most recent comprehensive USDA data show that non-predator causes accounted for nearly 98% of adult cattle deaths and nearly 89% of calf deaths. Wolves were responsible for a tiny fraction of losses in a national cattle market of tens of millions of animals.

He also raised a critical piece of the ledger that anti-wolf politics often leaves out: wolves can create real public benefits. A peer-reviewed 2021 study found that wolf presence reduced deer-vehicle collisions in Wisconsin counties by 24%, with economic benefits far exceeding verified wolf predation costs.

That is the bigger picture.

On Endangered Species Day, this is exactly the conversation we should be having. The Endangered Species Act is not a political bargaining chip. It is one of the most successful wildlife laws in the world, and it works when decisions are grounded in science—not scapegoating.

Wolves are not the problem. Weakening protections for endangered and recovering species is.

Read the LTE at the link in our comments!

05/16/2026
--Todd Wilkinson, the Yellowstonian
05/11/2026



--Todd Wilkinson, the Yellowstonian

M-44s, which use deadly sodium cyanide to kill wildlife carnivores on behalf of the livestock industry, are notorious for also felling lots of "non-target" animals imperiled species and pet dogs. After being banned from BLM lands, the Trump Administration appears poised to bring them back

With at least 32 wolves roaming Colorado — but releases on pause — reintroduction is at ‘inflection point’High survival ...
05/10/2026

With at least 32 wolves roaming Colorado — but releases on pause — reintroduction is at ‘inflection point’

High survival rate among last spring’s pups offsets adult wolves’ deaths, CPW biologists say

The Denver Post

“We’re at an interesting and tenuous time for this population,” said Brenna Cassidy, Colorado Parks and Wildlife’s wolf monitoring data coordinator.

--Eric Washburn, a fifth-generation Coloradan and big game hunter The Daily Sentinel of Grand Junction
05/09/2026



--Eric Washburn, a fifth-generation Coloradan and big game hunter
The Daily Sentinel of Grand Junction

By ERIC WASHBURN

"These funds are making a tangible difference for ranching communities across Colorado. By equipping producers with tool...
05/08/2026

"These funds are making a tangible difference for ranching communities across Colorado. By equipping producers with tools and expertise, we’re helping to prevent conflicts, protect livelihoods, and promote coexistence with Colorado’s native wildlife." -- Courtney Vail, RMWP



Endangered Species Coalition

Link to press release in comments*

Our deepest bows to Ted Turner, may he rest in peace. Ted did a lot for land and wildlife, through the Turner Ranches an...
05/07/2026

Our deepest bows to Ted Turner, may he rest in peace. Ted did a lot for land and wildlife, through the Turner Ranches and Turner Ranch Outfitting, and particularly for wolf recovery, especially through the Turner Endangered Species Fund and Turner Biodiversity Divisions.

It is with deep respect that we share the passing of Ted Turner, founder of Turner Ranch Outfitting. He passed peacefully at the age of 87.

Ted believed in something simple and powerful:

𝗧𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗵𝗮𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗮𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝘁𝗼 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝘂𝘀 𝗯𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿.

Because of that belief, bison roam, rivers run clear, and wild places like Vermejo, Armendaris, Ladder, and Sierra Grande continue to thrive.

I had the privilege of working alongside Ted and witnessing his commitment to the land and to future generations. What he built was remarkable. What he restored was even more important.

To those of you who have walked our trails, spent quiet time on these landscapes, or felt something shift while being here—you’ve experienced his legacy.

We will carry it forward with the same integrity, courage, and care that he inspired in all of us.

Ted, we will miss you pal.

With gratitude,
Jade

Jade McBride
President, Ted Turner Reserves

Address

Durango, CO

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Rocky Mountain Wolf Project posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Organization

Send a message to Rocky Mountain Wolf Project:

Share