09/18/2024
Why can't the city just cut spending and live within it's means? This question is asked by citizens and has been asked by the City itself, City Council, and independent audit, and an independent Citizens Financial Review Task Force. The conclusion of all is that if we want to City to continue to provide the services we have, there is nothing left to cut.
For example: The City Engineering Department, which is responsible for road maintenance, snow removal, road construction and inspections, trash pickup, the airport, traffic lights, sidewalk maintenance, bridges, streetlights, and much more operates with a full time staff of ten people.
Right now, with a small staff and a small budget, the department has to rely on grants, contract work (which can be more expensive than doing things in house), pushing costs on to homeowners (sidewalk replacements in some cases), but more often than not, since there is little funding for preventative maintenance, non-grant funded projects end up delayed indefinitely or dealt with only when there are emergencies (sinkholes, etc.).
If cuts are made we end up with
a. more dangerous roads and bridges that continue to deteriorate, leading at best to more expensive repairs later and at worst to dangerous conditions for residents
b. reduced services like trash, snow removal, streetlight replacements,
In short, the city's budget is closer to a yes/no proposition for services because of how tightly the budget is managed and stretched to make sure tax dollars are spent as efficiently as possible.