14/06/2026
"President Trump could announce that a portion of US nuclear missiles would be taken off alert: Surely not all of them need to be ready for immediate launch. He could commit that the United States would never use nuclear weapons first unless its very survival or that of one of its treaty allies were at stake. The president could commit that the United States would never deploy nuclear or hypersonic missiles within minutes of flight time from Moscow or Beijing to avoid making the warning time even shorter than it already is. He could offer to let Chinese or Russian experts monitor US weapons-maintenance experiments to confirm US compliance with the nuclear test ban. He could commit that all US nuclear enrichment and plutonium reprocessing activities be available for international inspection to confirm they were not being used to make new material for nuclear weapons.
None of those steps would endanger US security. On the contrary. If reciprocated, each of them would significantly improve national security. And they might be a first step toward new arms restraints that could replace New START."
Matthew Bunn writes about the lessons we can learn from JFK in a new piece for the Bulletin. Read more in "Beyond ‘Pax Americana’: How JFK’s lessons on unilateral nuclear restraint show that Trump should do more."
In 1963, John F. Kennedy proved that informal, one-sided moves could successfully defuse tensions with hostile adversaries. Today, as a multipolar arms race looms, JFK's blueprint offers a vital roadmap for a president who wants to avoid catastrophic miscalculation.