What are the opening hours?

Monday 11am - 5pm Tuesday 11am - 5pm Wednesday 11am - 5pm Thursday 11am - 5pm Friday 11am - 5pm

https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=NCF3MVP8N68JG

Black Talk Media Project, Charlotte, NC (2026)

11/18/2025

Fact-Check: Conservative Twins’ Claim on Foreign Student Enrollment

The Conservative Twins posted a graphic claiming that foreign student enrollment has “dropped 17% under President Trump,” describing it as evidence that student visas are “no longer a free-for-all.” It reads like official data, but there is no public dataset supporting this number. The claim leaves out the real forces driving enrollment changes in the United States.

**No Evidence for the “17% Drop”**

The latest verified enrollment data comes from the Institute of International Education’s *Open Doors* report and DHS statistics. Those datasets run through 2024. Nothing from either source shows a new 17 percent decline attributable to Trump’s current term.

If such a drop did occur, it has not been published through any federal agency, higher-education consortium, or established research body. The number appears to be political messaging rather than confirmed statistics.

**The Real Driver: The Cost of American Higher Education**

Foreign and domestic enrollment trends have been declining for more than a decade, and the root cause has nothing to do with “cracking down” on visas.

The United States now has:

* **the highest tuition costs in the developed world**

* **total cost of attendance at many public universities approaching $30,000–$40,000 per year**

* **limited work opportunities for international students**, who cannot legally offset tuition with full-time employment

* **rising housing costs** in almost every university town

Progressives like Bernie Sanders didn’t push free college because it was a catchy slogan; they did it because the American system has priced out its own citizens, let alone students coming from abroad.

Meanwhile, students can earn the same degrees elsewhere for a fraction of the price. Countries like:

* Canada
* Australia
* the United Kingdom
* Germany
* the Netherlands
* Japan

actively recruit foreign students with lower tuition, clearer visa pathways, and less political volatility. That global competition, not ideology, is the leading explanation for shifting international enrollment patterns.

**Visa Enforcement Is Not the Main Factor**

The Conservative Twins describe student visas as a “backdoor immigration pipeline.” The facts do not support that narrative.

* An F-1 student visa **does not** offer a path to permanent residency.

* Graduates only remain in the U.S. temporarily if they win acceptance into OPT programs or land one of the limited H-1B spots, which function on a lottery.

* DHS’s own overstay data consistently shows **low violation rates** among international students compared to tourists and business travelers.

The idea that universities were using student visas as a covert immigration system is a talking point, not an evidence-based claim.

**Universities Depend on International Students Financially**

Another missing piece: international students often **subsidize** American students.

They pay:

* full tuition,
* out-of-state rates,
* and in many cases, higher fees than domestic students.

When international enrollment drops, universities lose millions, which typically triggers cuts that affect American students first — not last. Public universities especially rely on this revenue because state legislatures have spent decades cutting higher-education budgets.

So celebrating a decline in foreign enrollment is effectively celebrating a cut in funding for U.S. schools.

**Political Volatility Also Matters**

The Trump administration’s first term had the sharpest pre-pandemic decline in new international student enrollment in nearly two decades. That drop was widely attributed to:

* travel bans
* unpredictable visa renewals
* anti-immigrant rhetoric
* fears among students and their families about long-term stability

Those same conditions can influence decisions now. But again, cost remains the dominant factor.

**Bottom Line**

The Conservative Twins’ graphic presents the claim as a simple cause-and-effect story about Trump “tightening” student visas. The real picture is economic, global, and long-running: American higher education has become too expensive, too unstable, and too politically volatile to compete with countries offering the same degrees at a fraction of the cost.

There is no confirmed federal source for the “17% drop,” and the narrative about visas being a “backdoor pipeline” is unsupported by policy or data.

10/19/2025

Fact check: There is no credible evidence to support the claim that the nationwide No Kings Day/No Kings protests rallies were sponsored by the Communist Party USA (CPUSA). Here is a breakdown of what is verifiable, what is unverified or misleading, and what is likely the case.

✅ What we do know
• The “No Kings” protests took place across the United States (and even in U.S. territories) in large numbers, with organizers claiming turnout in the millions.

• Several news outlets report that some right-wing figures (including members of Congress) have claimed that the demonstrations were “sponsored by communists.” For example, one article notes:
“Over 3,000 demonstrations have been organized … House Speaker … shared an image … indicating the Communist Party USA was supporting the No Kings rally in New York City.”

• The CPUSA itself published a post on its website saying it had “mobilised … in every corner of the country” during these protests and described its participation in the events.

❗ What is not established
• There is no publicly verifiable evidence that the CPUSA was an official sponsor of the entire “No Kings” movement. In common usage, “sponsor” implies formal organizing, funding, or overarching structuring — and no credible source documents that the CPUSA fulfilled this role for the movement as a whole.

• The claim that “millions of people attended and it was all run by the Communist Party” is highly misleading. While CPUSA participation is acknowledged, the movement is much broader and involves many organizations and individuals.

• The claim that CPUSA funded the protests with large sums of money or that the entire protest was a CPUSA-project lacks evidentiary support.

🔍 Explanation: What likely happened

• The “No Kings” protests appear to be a broad coalition of many grassroots and progressive groups (including labor unions, civil-liberties groups, local organizations) rather than a single-party initiative.

• CPUSA, as a left-wing organisation, evidently participated and tried to use the events for recruiting and promoting its message. Their own publication states:
“Revolutionary communist contingents mobilised in every corner of the country … Our program met with an eager audience …”
This suggests involvement, but not necessarily leadership or exclusive sponsorship.

• Some right-wing actors appear to have taken that CPUSA involvement and escalated the claim into “the movement is sponsored by communists,” using it as a rhetorical device to characterise the entire protest as extremist. (For example, a Fox News video referenced this claim.)

• The difference between “participation” and “sponsorship” is important: lots of protests have many groups participating without being sponsored or organized by any one of them.

🧾 Bottom line

• Claim: “The ‘No Kings’ rallies were sponsored by the Communist Party USA.” → Not supported by credible evidence.

• Fact: CPUSA participated in and promoted the “No Kings” protests, as did many other groups.

• Caveat: Participation by CPUSA does not equal that the entire protest movement was “run by” or “funded by” the CPUSA.

• The claim, as often framed (“millions on the streets, the Communist Party is behind them”) is a misleading oversimplification.

Americans who identify as communists have the same civil rights as every other citizen. Besides the jews, right wing fascists like Hi**er have historically used the communist scare to demonize political opponents and strip them of their rights abd privileges thus exposing the fraud of western democracies.

10/11/2025

📢 The Confederacy and its history are rooted in hate — not heritage — and do not tell our entire, shared story! Revisit the SPLC's resources and about the Confederacy: https://bit.ly/3qe3f8T

10/11/2025

The Gateway Pundit’s claim is misleading. Undocumented immigrants aren’t “collecting” full Medicaid benefits — federal law limits them to emergency-only care, and states that cover more do it with their own funds, not Washington’s.

What they don’t tell you is that these same immigrants are paying billions into the system every year. The IRS issues ITINs so they can file taxes. In 2022 alone, “undocumented” workers paid about $96 billion in federal, state, and local taxes — including $25 billion into Social Security and $6 billion into Medicare, programs they can’t even use.

So before crying “free ride,” ask who’s really subsidizing whom. They’re funding the system more than they’re taking from it — that’s the part Gateway Pundit leaves out because they’re a propaganda outlet and not real journalists. These are far right wing extremist activists posing as a news outlet.

10/05/2025

🚨 Exposing Right-Wing Spin: The Truth About DHS “Patrols” in Chicago

Post: The Conservative Twins are amplifying another piece of propaganda about a so-called “terror attack” on DHS agents in Chicago. Let’s separate facts from their biased framing.

The Facts:

✔️ DHS says federal agents were boxed in by multiple cars and rammed while on “patrol” near the Broadview ICE facility. Agents fired and struck a woman, who was taken into custody. No federal officers were seriously injured.

✔️ The woman allegedly posted threats against ICE online, according to DHS intelligence. But that evidence has not been independently verified — it comes from DHS itself.

✔️ Initial reports tied the incident directly to the Broadview ICE facility, but later corrections showed the confrontation unfolded in Brighton Park, several miles away.

What They Don’t Say:
These “patrols” are part of Operation Midway Blitz, Trump’s surge of immigration raids across Illinois. Families have reported late-night apartment invasions, people zip-tied, children dragged out of bed, and communities terrorized. This isn’t routine law enforcement — it’s intimidation.

So let’s be honest: these “patrols” are not just about enforcing the law. They are designed to discourage protest, suppress organizing, and normalize a militarized assault on Black, Brown, and immigrant neighborhoods.

And here’s the bigger picture: when a government chooses violent repression instead of listening to its people — when Trump, a deeply unpopular figure, doubles down on fascist tactics with Republican backing — it looks less like law and order and more like they are trying to provoke a civil war.

The Hodge Twins want you to believe local leaders are “enabling violence.” But the real violence is coming from the federal government — and it’s aimed directly at our communities.

10/05/2025

🧾 FACT-CHECK: Misleading Framing by Gateway Pundit on “FBI Takedown of Maduro Network”

This story is another example of dishonest framing designed to make it sound like U.S. authorities have “proven” Nicolás Maduro’s personal involvement in a money-laundering operation. That’s not true.

✅ What’s confirmed:

– Two men — Arick Komarczyk and Irazmar Carbajal — were indicted in Florida for alleged money laundering and unlicensed money transmission.

– The FBI says the scheme involved moving funds “tied to” Venezuelan officials or associates of the Maduro government.

– Only one suspect is in custody; the other remains in Venezuela.

– Nowhere has the DOJ or FBI stated that Nicolás Maduro himself was charged, named as a co-conspirator, or proven to be involved.

🚫 What’s misleading:

– There is no DOJ press release confirming the “takedown of a Maduro money-laundering network.”

– The headline falsely implies a criminal conviction or direct evidence against Maduro, when all that exists are allegations about two intermediaries.

– Claims that this represents a new DOJ “pressure campaign” are purely editorial spin — the U.S. has maintained sanctions on Venezuela for years.

💰 The bigger picture:

The United States uses its control over the global financial system (especially the SWIFT network and dollar-based clearing) to impose and enforce sanctions — often without international due process.

That’s precisely why Venezuela and other nations have turned to BRICS, which is building its own alternative payment systems and promoting trade in local currencies to escape Washington’s unilateral power.

So no — this story doesn’t prove “Maduro’s criminal guilt.” It proves how Washington’s sanctions regime and propaganda ecosystem collaborate to criminalize sovereign governments that resist U.S. financial dominance.

07/28/2025

Here's a detailed fact-check and breakdown of the meme from T. West critiquing Tariq Nasheed's claim about Russia being landlocked and not participating in the transatlantic slave trade:

✅ CLAIM 1: Russia is landlocked
Status: FALSE

Fact: Russia is not a landlocked country. It has multiple major coastlines:

Arctic Ocean (north)

Pacific Ocean (east)

Baltic Sea (via St. Petersburg and Kaliningrad)

Black Sea (via Crimea and the Caucasus)

These ports have long supported both military and trade navies.

🔍 Conclusion: Tariq Nasheed is incorrect. Russia has naval access and has had maritime capabilities for centuries.

✅ CLAIM 2: Russia did not participate in the transatlantic slave trade
Status: TRUE (with important nuance)

Russia did not participate in the transatlantic slave trade system that transported millions of Africans to the Americas.

However, Russia did have its own internal systems of serfdom (hereditary bo***ge) and has been involved in other forms of forced labor.

Russia's interactions with Africans were limited, partly due to geography, political focus, and lack of overseas colonies.

🔍 Conclusion: It’s accurate to say Russia didn’t participate in the transatlantic slave trade — but not because it was landlocked. It’s due to historical, imperial, and economic factors.

✅ CLAIM 3: Russia helped protect the U.S. from European powers during the Civil War
Status: TRUE

In 1863, Russia sent naval fleets to New York and San Francisco during the U.S. Civil War. Historians widely view this as a signal to Britain and France not to intervene on behalf of the Confederacy.

This action was less about morality and more about geopolitics — Russia didn’t want Britain aiding anti-Czarist rebels in Poland.

🔍 Conclusion: Factually accurate — Russia’s fleets were a strategic deterrent in support of Union interests.

✅ CLAIM 4: Russia opposed Britain during the U.S. Revolutionary War and supported American independence
Status: PARTIALLY TRUE

Russia under Catherine the Great did not directly support the American Revolution but also refused to join Britain.

Russia led the League of Armed Neutrality (1780), aimed at protecting neutral shipping rights from British interference.

The U.S. benefited indirectly from this neutrality and disruption to British naval dominance.

🔍 Conclusion: Russia’s position during the Revolutionary War was not pro-American, but it did complicate Britain’s war efforts.

✅ CLAIM 5: Alexander Pushkin’s great-grandfather was an African given an education in Russia
Status: TRUE

Abram Petrovich Gannibal was an African child, believed to be from Cameroon or Eritrea, enslaved by the Ottomans and later taken by Peter the Great.

He was educated in France and Russia, eventually rising to the rank of general and becoming a noble.

Gannibal is the great-grandfather of the iconic Russian poet Alexander Pushkin.

🔍 Conclusion: Historically accurate.

🔚 Final Evaluation:
The meme mostly checks out factually and accurately calls out Tariq Nasheed’s incorrect claim about Russia being landlocked. The reasons for Russia’s non-involvement in the transatlantic slave trade are more complex than just geography. T. West rightly points out a nuanced historical perspective.

07/28/2025

🔍 Claim 1: "Trump and Republicans – If you care about the Epstein files, we don’t want your support".

Accuracy: No public record of Donald Trump or the Republican Party explicitly saying this. However:

The Republican establishment has largely avoided or downplayed deeper investigations into Epstein’s connections with powerful elites.

Trump himself was named in allegations (e.g., by Katie Johnson, though the case was dropped), and had a known relationship with Epstein. This could make discussions politically sensitive for Republicans.

Some conservatives (like Marjorie Taylor Greene) have actually used Epstein-related claims against Democrats (e.g., Bill Clinton) rather than suppressing them.

📌 Conclusion: This is more hyperbolic criticism than a direct quote, but it reflects a perceived unwillingness among GOP elites to confront Epstein-related accountability when it implicates their own ranks.

🔍 Claim 2: "Kamala and Democrats – If you care about Gaza, we don’t want your support"

Accuracy: Again, there is no direct quote of Kamala Harris or Democratic leadership saying this, but:

The Biden-Harris administration has faced intense criticism for its unwavering support of Israel, even amid public concern over Palestinian deaths.

Pro-Palestinian protesters have been removed from events or arrested for disrupting Democratic speeches, and there’s been a trend of "Vote Blue No Matter Who" pressure against leftist dissenters.

Progressive voices (like Rashida Tlaib or even Bernie Sanders) have often been marginalized within the party when calling out Israeli actions.

Kamala Harris herself has made comments suggesting that criticizing Israel is unacceptable in certain political contexts (e.g., equating it with antisemitism).

📌 Conclusion: This isn’t a literal quote but accurately reflects the hostile climate some pro-Palestinian activists face within Democratic Party politics.

🧠 Overall Message: Both parties suppress dissent on elite accountability issues
The core thesis—that both major parties discourage scrutiny of elite wrongdoing or foreign policy complicity—is widely echoed by independent and alternative media. While the quotes are paraphrased or exaggerated, the pattern of marginalization and selective outrage is a well-documented critique of bipartisan establishment politics.

✅ Final Verdict: The meme is not literally accurate in quoting either side but is symbolically and politically accurate in pointing to:

Republican discomfort with Epstein-related inquiries.

Democratic repression of Gaza-related dissent.

The broader pattern of silencing voices that challenge elite power structures across both parties.

07/23/2025

Rudy Ray Moore (1927–2008) was a pioneering African American comedian, singer, actor, and filmmaker, best known in Hollywood history for his creation and portrayal of the character Dolemite, a flamboyant, street-wise pimp and kung fu-fighting hero. He is often called the “Godfather of Rap” for his early use of rhyming, rhythm, and street poetry that heavily influenced the development of hip-hop.

Key Points:

🔹 Early Life & Career:
• Born in Arkansas and raised in Milwaukee, Moore started as a stand-up comedian and R&B singer.
• He worked in various parts of the entertainment industry, including comedy albums that were known for being extremely explicit and underground in nature.
• His albums, like Eat Out More Often (1970), were sold in adult bookstores and barbershops due to their raunchy content.

🔹 Dolemite Legacy:
• In 1975, Moore self-financed and starred in “Dolemite”, a blaxploitation film based on his comedy character—a fast-talking, kung fu–fighting pimp who seeks revenge.
• Despite its low budget and campy style, Dolemite became a cult classic and spawned several sequels, including The Human Tornado (1976).
• The character combined Moore’s street poetry with over-the-top action and comedy, becoming a cultural touchstone in Black cinema.

🔹 Influence on Hip-Hop:
• Moore’s rhyming delivery, street storytelling, and bold persona made him a major influence on early hip-hop artists.
• Rappers like Snoop Dogg and Big Daddy Kane have cited Moore as an inspiration.
• His albums are seen as precursors to the rap genre for their rhythmic delivery and lyrical content.

🔹 Later Recognition:
• In 2019, Eddie Murphy portrayed Rudy Ray Moore in the Netflix biopic “Dolemite Is My Name,” bringing renewed attention and acclaim to Moore’s life and work.
• The film highlighted his hustle, DIY spirit, and struggle to break into Hollywood on his own terms.

Rudy Ray Moore’s legacy lies in his status as a self-made cultural icon who broke barriers in comedy and film, and laid groundwork for hip-hop long before it entered the mainstream. He did it all independently—writing, producing, financing, and promoting his own work at a time when the mainstream industry largely excluded Black creatives like him.

07/14/2025

Were People In the Bible Described as Black?

🧠 TikTok Theology Alert! Some recent videos are claiming that the Bible is full of people describing themselves as Black or that everyone in Scripture was of African descent. Let’s unpack what’s actually written — and what’s not.

✅ Biblical References to Dark Skin or African Descent (Old Testament):

📖 Song of Songs 1:5–6

“I am black, but comely… look not upon me, because I am black, because the sun hath looked upon me.”

🗣️ Spoken by the Shulammite woman. This is a direct, poetic self-description using the Hebrew word "shachor", meaning black/dark.

📖 Job 30:30

“My skin is black upon me, and my bones are burned with heat.”

🧎🏾‍♂️ A description of physical suffering — not ethnicity — but still a literal use of the word “black.”

📖 Jeremiah 13:23

“Can the Ethiopian (Cush*te) change his skin, or the leopard his spots?”

📌 This acknowledges dark skin as a natural trait. “Cush*te” was a known term for people from Nubia/Ethiopia.

📖 Numbers 12:1

“And Miriam and Aaron spoke against Moses because of the Cush*te woman he had married...”
✊🏿 His wife was from Cush — a region south of Egypt (modern Sudan or Ethiopia). African origin is clear.

📖 Genesis 10:6

“And the sons of Ham: Cush, Mizraim, Put, and Canaan.”

🌍 The Cush*tes were a known African people. The Bible acknowledges their lineage.

📖 Lamentations 4:8

“Their visage is blacker than coal...”
🖤 Refers to extreme famine/suffering, not race — but again, a literal visual description.

🧾 What the Bible Doesn’t Say:

❌ No one in the Bible explicitly says “I am Black” as a racial identifier.
❌ No text claims everyone in Scripture was of African descent.
❌ Patriarchs like Abraham, Isaac, or Jacob aren’t described in racial or ethnic terms.

✝️ What About the New Testament and Yeshua (Jesus Christ)?

When we come to the ministry of Yeshua / Jesus Christ, debates over skin color, s*x, gender, or race miss the point entirely. These categories — especially “race” as a concept — didn’t even exist in the way we think of them today.

📜 Galatians 3:28

“There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.”

📖 His teachings were about truth, love, liberation, and justice — not tribalism or pigmentation. If you are a follower of his principles, the focus should be on how we live, not what color we claim.

🎯 Final Word:

Yes, the Bible includes references to dark-skinned people and African nations, and it affirms them as part of God's creation and history.
But let’s not use this truth to stir ego wars or “identity supremacy” debates.

If you’re about that Yeshua walk, then you know:
🕊️ Truth, not tribalism. Spirit, not skin. Justice, not ego.

07/14/2025

The meme springs from genuine, disturbing reports—but it distorts and sensationalizes key elements. Here’s the fact check:

✅ True: The IDF used AI systems called “Lavender” and “Where’s Daddy?”**

* Multiple investigations by +972 Magazine, Local Call, The Guardian, Le Monde, and NPR confirm the existence of “Lavender,” a database flagged \~37,000 Palestinian men as potential Hamas or Islamic Jihad operatives, and “Where’s Daddy?” which allegedly tracks when these individuals are home to strike ([Democracy Now!][1]).

* These systems were reportedly used with minimal human oversight, with field officers overwhelmed by sheer volume and relying heavily on algorithmic decisions ([Wikipedia][2]).

# # # ⚠️ **Partially True / Misleading: Palantir is directly behind these systems**

* Palantir Technologies does provide AI-driven intelligence platforms (like Gotham) to the IDF—and publicly entered a strategic IDF partnership in early 2024 ([Wikipedia][3]).

* However, the specific AI tools “Lavender” and “Where’s Daddy?” are widely reported to originate from Israeli military intelligence Unit 8200, not Palantir directly ([+972 Magazine][4]).

* That said, critics link them to broader AI infrastructure—some argue Palantir tech *likely plays a role* in the ecosystem, though not necessarily designing these exact algorithms.

---

*😂*Meme claims about Peter Thiel “sh*tting his pants”**

* Viral videos (e.g., Instagram/X reels) show Peter Thiel visibly uncomfortable when asked about Israel's use of AI, but “sh*t your pants” is sensational clickbait—not literal nor evidenced ([Instagram][5]).

* Thiel hasn't acknowledged that Palantir built “Lavender” or “Where’s Daddy?” specifically. He has expressed deference to Israel on such technologies, but offered no direct denial or admission.

# # # 🧭 **Context and controversy**

| **Scale** | Up to 37,000 names flagged; reportedly 20 civilians accepted per strike on low-level suspects; much higher numbers for senior targets ([Le Monde.fr][6]) |

| **Human oversight** | IDF says staff independently verify and review every target; critics say overwhelmed humans merely “rubber-stamped” AI outputs
|
| **Ethical concerns** | UN, human rights experts, and legal scholars warn that such tools risk war crimes by lowering the threshold for civilian harm |

# # # ✅ **Bottom line**

* **Yes**, “Lavender” and “Where’s Daddy?” are real IDF AI systems used in Gaza with controversial and disturbing implications.

* **No**, there’s *no verified evidence* that Palantir—or Peter Thiel specifically—engineered or named those systems.

* Palantir **does supply** AI and data tools to the IDF, likely as part of a broader intelligence infrastructure, but direct culpability for **those two tools** remains unproven.

* The meme exaggerates Thiel’s reaction—he looked uneasy, but was not literally “sh*tting his pants.”

If you’re concerned about **Palantir’s role**, credible sources show it does provide AI platforms to the IDF . But ascribing ownership of “Lavender” and “Where’s Daddy?” to Thiel is **unsupported** by open reporting.

Black Talk Media Project

11/18/2025

10/19/2025

10/11/2025

10/11/2025

10/05/2025

10/05/2025

07/28/2025

07/28/2025

07/23/2025

07/14/2025

07/14/2025

Address

Opening Hours

Telephone

Website

Alerts

Shortcuts

Share

Category

Monday	11am - 5pm
Tuesday	11am - 5pm
Wednesday	11am - 5pm
Thursday	11am - 5pm
Friday	11am - 5pm