10/15/2026
This is exactly the kind of rail investment Alabama needs, Congresswoman Sewell. Additional funding for rural rail infrastructure can strengthen communities, improve regional connections, and create the foundation for better passenger service. But investment in rail infrastructure also needs to be paired with enforcement of the laws that are supposed to make passenger rail reliable.
Federal law already requires passenger trains to receive preference over freight on shared tracks under 49 U.S.C. § 24308(c). The problem has been enforcement.
The DOJ’s 2024 lawsuit against Norfolk Southern is a perfect example. The government alleged that freight dispatching repeatedly delayed Amtrak’s Crescent, including cases where passenger trains were held while multiple freight trains passed. At the time, only 24% of southbound Crescent trains on Norfolk Southern-controlled track arrived on time.
After the case was settled in 2025, Norfolk Southern agreed to give Amtrak the highest priority, require supervisory approval when dispatchers do otherwise, train employees on passenger priority, and provide delay records to the DOJ. The result matters: Crescent delay minutes fell 53% from 2024 to 2025.
That is an urbanism issue as much as a legal one. Passenger rail cannot function as a serious alternative to driving and flying if a scheduled train can routinely be sidelined for freight. We can invest millions in tracks, stations, equipment, and rural rail infrastructure, but reliability is infrastructure too.
As Alabama continues receiving federal rail investment, I hope we also continue pushing for stronger enforcement of passenger rail priority so that the system we are building actually works for the people who depend on it.