08/10/2025
Update: Proceedings of the Eighth (8) Session of the Sham Trial of H.E. Dr. Riek Machar and Seven Other Detainees from the SPLM/A (IO)
8 October 2025
Today, the so-called Special Court on the Nasir Incident, established by the SPLM (IG) to prosecute the First Vice President, H.E. Dr. Riek Machar Teny-Dhurgon, and seven other SPLM/A (IO) detainees, held its eighth session at Freedom Hall in Juba.
During the session, the prosecution submitted four (4) additional exhibits and two (2) physical exhibits as evidence against the eight (8) SPLM/A (IO) detainees. The sham court admitted in principle the submitted exhibits despite the objections from the defense team. The submitted exhibits were:
Tenth Exhibit:
• A letter from the Board of Directors of the National Communications Authority (NCA) concerning the extraction of data from electronic devices (phones and laptops… etc) belonging to detainees of the SPLM/A (IO), dated 5 September 2025.
• A Ministerial Order issued by the Minister for Justice and Constitutional Affairs, appointing an individual to photograph the alleged evidence extracted from the devices, dated 5 September 2025.
• A Ministerial Order issued by the Minister for Justice and Constitutional Affairs approving the photographs taken of the alleged evidence, dated 5 September 2025.
It should be noted that all three documents were issued after the case file was referred to the so-called Special Court on 1 September 2025.
Eleventh Exhibit:
• A report from the Board of Directors of the National Security Service regarding a radio-signal device allegedly belonging to H.E. Dr. Riek Machar, dated 3 September 2025 —issued after the case file had already been referred to the so-called Special Court on 1 September 2025.
• USB flash drives allegedly containing video clips and audio recordings related to the Nasir incident.
• A notebook allegedly containing outgoing and incoming communication data from the said radio-signal device connected to the incident. (Objected to by the defense team on the following grounds):
1. Violation of privacy and contravention of Article 22 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Sudan.
2. The radio-signal device was confiscated without a search warrant issued by the Public Prosecution or a competent court.
3. The notebook was obtained unlawfully, as proper search protocols were not followed, in violation of Articles 107 and 108 of the Criminal Procedure Act, 2008.
Twelfth Exhibit:
• A report from the South Sudan People’s Defence Forces (SSPDF), signed by General Santino Deng Akot, regarding the evacuation of its forces from Nasir, dated 10 March 2025. (Objected to by the defense team on the grounds that the airlift and evacuation of late General David Majur Dak and the remaining SSPDF soldiers—following the Armed Youth’s overrun of the SSPDF base in Wech-Yar-Adiu, Nasir, on 4 March 2025—as well as subsequent evacuation efforts taken after the 7 March 2025 incident—including the recovery and evacuation of the bodies of the late General Majur and a UN crew member, and the evacuation of scattered SSPDF soldiers from Jonglei and Upper Nile States—were coordinated by Dr. Riek Machar Teny-Dhurgon with the knowledge of President Salva Kiir Mayardit, the Cabinet, the United Nations Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS), and the other guarantors of the Revitalized Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in the Republic of South Sudan.)
Thirteenth Exhibit:
• Press Statement No. 16026/2025 issued by the United Nations Security Council on 21 March 2025, titled "Attack Against United Nations Mission in South Sudan." (The statement made no reference to the role or involvement of the eight SPLM/A (IO) detainees “accused” in the Nasir incident.)
The Prosecution Submitted Two (2) Physical Exhibits:
1. A Samsung mobile phone.
2. A MacBook laptop.
The prosecution claimed that both devices belonged to Dr. Riek Machar Teny-Dhurgon. (Objected to by the defense team on the following grounds:)
a) Violation of privacy and contravention of Article 22 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Sudan.
b) The electronic devices were confiscated without a search warrant issued by the Public Prosecution or a competent court.
c) Search protocols were not followed, in violation of Articles 107 and 108 of the Criminal Procedure Act, 2008.
The court did not issue a ruling on these two (2) physical exhibits today. A decision has been postponed until the arrival of the so-called forensic expert contracted by the SPLM (IG), who is tasked with analyzing the data allegedly extracted from the mobile phones and laptops belonging to Dr. Riek Machar and other SPLM/A (IO) detainees.
The session was adjourned and will resume on Monday, 13 October 2025.
The so-called Special Court permitted the defense team to visit the seven (7) detainees held at the National Security Service detention facility at the Blue House for a period of one hour.
It's worth noting that Gen. Gabriel Duop Lam, Deputy Chief of Defense Forces of the SSPDF, Chief of the Staff of the SPLA (IO) and Co-Chair of the Joint Defense Board (JDB); 1st Lt. Mading Yak Riek, Radio-signal personnel in the SPLA (IO); and Mr. Dominic Gatgok Riek, generator operator at the office of the First Vice President have been moved from Jamus and Tiger detention centres in Giada to the Blue House.
The court also granted permission for Hon. Gatwech Lam Puoch to visit his family to offer condolences following the passing of a relative.
The SPLM/A (IO) reiterates its rejection of the so-called Special Court, which it views as a mechanism created to abrogate the Revitalized Agreement and to conduct a political witch-hunt against Dr. Riek Machar and the SPLM/A (IO). The movement calls for the immediate and unconditional release of H.E. Dr. Riek Machar Teny-Dhurgon and all SPLM/A (IO) detainees.
Cde. Puok Both Baluang