26/04/2026
The UP Journalism Club condemns the Toboso killings and urges critical scrutiny of official narratives
On April 19, a military strafing operation was launched by the 79th Infantry “Masaligan” Battalion of the 3rd Infantry Division of the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) in Barangay Salamanca, Toboso, Negros Occidental. The operation resulted in the deaths of at least 19 individuals and the displacement of around 168 families, affecting around 653 residents.
Among those killed were individuals whose lives and work were rooted in public service and truth-telling: UP Diliman University Student Council Education and Research Councilor Alyssa “Aly” Alano; community journalist and former Spectrum editor-in-chief RJ Ledesma; UP Open University student Maureen “Mau” Keil Santuyo; community researcher Errol Wendel; and human rights advocate Lyle Prijoles, along with 14 others. Their deaths demand more than labels; they demand careful, evidence-based accounting.
Official statements have framed the incident as a legitimate armed encounter, citing the presence of armed insurgents and recovered weapons. These claims, however, remain contested by accounts from the ground and by human rights groups. Even if an armed encounter did occur, this does not resolve critical questions: whether all those killed were combatants, whether the principles of distinction and proportionality were upheld, and whether each death has been subjected to independent verification. Under International Humanitarian Law, the presence of conflict heightens—rather than diminishes—the obligation to protect civilians and ensure accountability (International Committee of the Red Cross, 2005).
We caution against the rapid consolidation of a singular narrative that collapses complex identities into a single category of “combatant.” Reports indicate that RJ Ledesma may not have been at the site of the alleged firefight, raising serious concerns about the blanket characterization of the victims.
The reduction of individuals into state-defined labels without due process reflects a pattern where narrative precedes verification. This pattern is not incidental. It reflects the production of hegemonic narratives, where dominant institutions shape public understanding by presenting partial accounts as complete truths (Hall, 1982).
When such narratives are uncritically reproduced, they risk legitimizing violence while obscuring unresolved questions of accountability. In conflict settings, assertions of “community intelligence” necessitate careful scrutiny, as information is frequently generated under circumstances of fear, coercion, or survival rather than genuine consent.
For journalism, this moment underscores a fundamental responsibility. As the Fourth Estate, the press exists not to echo power but to scrutinize it; to test official claims against independent evidence, to surface contradictions, and to ensure that no life is reduced to a label without proof (Schudson, 2008). The uncritical repetition of state narratives transforms journalism into machinery that reproduces rather than interrogates power, enabling the normalization of violence through language.
So, we ask that media professionals and organizations follow the highest standards of verification and independence. Reporting needs to go beyond official statements and include community testimonies, forensic evidence, and investigations that are not connected to the government. It must focus on the lived experiences of the deceased—not as mere abstractions in a conflict, but as individuals whose rights endure irrespective of allegations.
We likewise call for a transparent, independent, and credible investigation into the Toboso killings. Accountability cannot rest on unilateral claims; it must be established through processes that are open, evidence-based, and just.
As journalists, our role is not merely to report what is said, but to interrogate what is claimed. In moments where narratives are contested and lives are at stake, this responsibility becomes even more urgent.
Justice for Alyssa Alano, RJ Ledesma, Mau Santuyo, Errol Wendel, Lyle Prijoles, and all victims.
Uphold International Humanitarian Law.
End militarization in Negros.
—
References:
Hall, S (1982). The rediscovery of “ideology”: Return of the repressed in media studies. In M. Gurevitch et al. (n.d.) Culture, society, and the media. Routledge.
International Committee of the Red Cross (2005). Customary international humanitarian law, Volume I: Rules. Cambridge University Press
Shudson, M. (2008). Why democracies need an unlovable press. Polity Press