26/06/2026
𝗞𝗘𝗘𝗣 𝗢𝗥𝗜𝗘𝗡𝗧𝗔𝗟 𝗠𝗜𝗡𝗗𝗢𝗥𝗢 𝗚𝗠𝗢-𝗙𝗥𝗘𝗘: The Triple Planetary Crisis Calls for Farmer-Led Agroecology, Not Corporate-Controlled GM Technologies
Magsasaka at Siyentipiko para sa Pag-unlad ng Agrikultura (MASIPAG), together with farmers' organizations, environmental advocates, scientists, consumers, and faith-based groups, expresses grave concern over the ongoing review of Oriental Mindoro's long-standing ban on genetically modified organisms (GMOs).
Recent consultations facilitated by the Southeast Asian Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture (SEARCA) and the Provincial Agriculture Office have raised serious concerns that the province's existing GMO safeguards may be amended, weakened, or repealed. Yet despite the significance of these discussions for farmers, consumers, indigenous peoples, and local communities, no draft ordinance, committee report, technical assessment, or policy proposal has been made publicly available. The people of Oriental Mindoro have the right to know what changes are being proposed, what scientific and policy evidence is being used to justify them, and who stands to benefit from these changes.
The developments in Oriental Mindoro should not be viewed in isolation. They form part of an emerging national pattern in which local GMO safeguards, painstakingly established through democratic consultation, environmental precaution, and the exercise of local autonomy, are increasingly being challenged. Similar efforts have surfaced in Negros Occidental and other local governments that have historically exercised their authority to regulate or prohibit genetically modified crops.
This trend is particularly troubling because it unfolds while serious scientific, legal, and governance concerns surrounding the country's GMO regulatory system remain unresolved.
In 2024, the Court of Appeals granted the Writ of Kalikasan and Writ of Continuing Mandamus in the cases involving Golden Rice and Bt Eggplant. The Court found significant deficiencies in government biosafety risk assessment, environmental monitoring, and regulatory oversight, and directed concerned agencies to strengthen these mechanisms. More importantly, the ruling reaffirmed the precautionary principle as a guiding framework whenever scientific uncertainties persist regarding potentially serious or irreversible environmental harm.
Instead of first addressing these deficiencies and strengthening biosafety governance, policy discussions appear increasingly focused on dismantling local safeguards. This raises a fundamental question: Why are local governments being encouraged to open their territories to GMO cultivation when concerns over risk assessment, monitoring, contamination, accountability, and long-term ecological impacts have yet to be fully resolved?
Oriental Mindoro's GMO ban was not adopted arbitrarily. It emerged through years of public consultation and reflected the province's commitment to protecting biodiversity, ecological agriculture, local seed systems, public welfare, and the right of communities to determine the future of their own food and farming systems. These commitments have since been reinforced through the province's broader environmental policies and regulatory framework.
MASIPAG likewise condemns the continued promotion of genetically modified crops by SEARCA and other biotechnology proponents as a supposed pathway toward sustainable agriculture. Such a narrative ignores the growing convergence of global scientific and policy discussions recognizing agroecology and organic agriculture as among the most effective responses to the triple planetary crisis of climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution.
The urgency of this transition is even greater for the Philippines. The incoming Super El Niño will definitely expose the country's profound vulnerability to prolonged drought, crop losses, water scarcity, and worsening food insecurity. Rather than increasing dependence on proprietary GMO seeds and external chemical inputs, public institutions should be investing in farming systems that enhance ecological resilience through farmer-led agroecology, biodiversity conservation, local seed systems, climate adaptation, and farmer innovation.
Equally concerning are recurring claims that Bt corn should be promoted because it supposedly reduces pesticide use. Such claims no longer reflect the actual trajectory of GMO corn cultivation in the Philippines.
Data from the Bureau of Plant Industry show that insect-resistant (Bt-only) corn varieties had virtually disappeared from commercial planting, while herbicide-tolerant-only varieties had likewise ceased commercial adoption by 2020. The Philippine GMO corn sector is now overwhelmingly dominated by stacked-trait varieties that combine insect-resistant (Bt) and herbicide-tolerant (HT) characteristics. Framing GMO corn primarily as a pesticide-reduction technology therefore obscures the central role played by herbicide-tolerant traits and the chemical weed-management systems that accompany them. The discussion can no longer be confined to reductions in insecticide use; it must also confront growing concerns over herbicide dependence, resistant weeds and pests, biodiversity decline, monoculture expansion, and the increasing concentration of corporate control over seeds and agricultural production.
Farmers, consumers, scientists, indigenous peoples, local governments, and civil society organizations deserve meaningful participation in determining the future of agricultural policy. Such participation is impossible without complete transparency and unrestricted public access to all documents related to the ongoing review.
MASIPAG therefore reiterates its demand for the immediate release of all documents, technical assessments, committee reports, and policy proposals related to the review of Oriental Mindoro's GMO ordinance. We likewise call upon provincial officials to uphold the principles of transparency, precaution, democratic participation, local autonomy, and environmental accountability.
As the triple planetary crisis intensifies and climate extremes such as the recent Super El Niño become more frequent, the future of Philippine agriculture will not be secured through the further expansion of corporate-controlled GM technologies. It will be secured by strengthening farmer-led agroecology, biodiversity conservation, local seed systems, climate resilience, and food sovereignty.