24/07/2026
PRESS RELEASE
Scientist group debunks the claims of BCDA on Pax Silica
AGHAM ADVOCATES OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY FOR THE PEOPLE
July 24, 2026
AGHAM takes issue with some of the claims made by the Bases Conversion and Development Authority (BCDA) with regards to the proposed 1,620 hectare Pax Silica Economic Security Zone (ESZ) in Tarlac. Based on publicly available information and data, we have assessed BCDA’s claims and show below that, at best, they present an incomplete picture of the potential impacts of the Pax Silica project. As a progressive group of scientists, engineers, and STEM advocates, we continue to register our opposition to the Pax Silica project.
Claim #1: Pax Silica will not displace farmers and IPs.
According to reports from local media, the BCDA has already put out an initial list of Project Affected Persons for the project earlier this month, showing that residents of Brgys. O'Donnel, Aranguren, and Santa Lucia of Capas, Tarlac will be impacted. According to data from the Capas municipal LGU, over 30% of its land area is considered productive agricultural land. In fact, local government projects conducted this year have targeted farmers from the three barangays mentioned, as well as farmers from adjacent barangays who belong to indigenous groups. There are also Aeta communities in the area of New Clark City (adjacent to the Pax Silica site) whose ancestral lands are not formally recognized by the NCIP. These are the farmers and IP groups that will be displaced. Displacement can be direct physical displacement or indirect displacement by loss of livelihood, and the immense scale of the project will undoubtedly affect the livelihoods of farmers both inside and outside the project area.
Claim #2: Pax Silica will run primarily on renewable energy like solar.
The AI data centers that Pax Silica is courting will run 24/7, and intermittent energy sources like solar and wind may not be able to supply energy consistently for this purpose since they are highly dependent on environmental factors. This would likely mean that, in reality, Pax Silica will still use fossil fuels, or introduce controversial sources like nuclear, to power much of its operations. There are reports of how data centers in the US are resorting to diesel generators to keep operations running, resulting in massive air pollution. Even if they were to use solar, supplying even just half of the projected 3 - 5 gigawatt (GW) energy consumption of the project would require over a thousand hectares of additional land for solar farms. Simply put, more displacement, and more social and ecological devastation.
Claim #3: Pax Silica will not use community water, and instead will rely on surface water harvesting.
Surface water harvesting, or rainfall collection, will still mean reducing the water used or available for farmers and their communities, including communities downstream of the project. Rainfall is one of the ways underground aquifers are recharged, and diverting this water to resource-intensive development projects will undoubtedly affect the community water sources in the area. There are reports in other countries how communities are now dealing with dirty tap and drinking water due to nearby operations of AI data centers, the same centers Pax Silica wants to bring into our country. This claim by the BCDA also raises the question how water needs of the project will be met in situations of drought or low rainfall, which are becoming more frequent with worsening climate change.
Claim #4: Pax Silica will produce hundreds of thousands of jobs for Filipinos.
The AI data centers Pax Silica wants to introduce will not actually lead to a significant number of long-term jobs. For example, the hyperscale data centers of Meta and OpenAI in North America, of which a single campus can occupy over 500 hectares, only produce hundreds of long-term jobs at most; any claim that "thousands of jobs" are generated by AI data centers likely pertains to temporary construction work. On the other hand, it is possible that the much-flaunted "advanced manufacturing" brought in by potential investors such as Foxconn can generate thousands of blue-collar jobs. These jobs, however, will very likely be oriented towards production for export rather than Philippine consumption, simply replicating what is happening in other export processing zones in the country. It is also likely, as is the case in Foxconn's operations in India, that managers, engineers, and technicians will still be sourced from other countries rather than from the Philippines.
Claim #5: Pax Silica will not manufacture weapons, and is intended for commercial AI, semiconductor, and advanced manufacturing industries.
The US has used AI for its military operations, as we are seeing in its current war on Iran. Semiconductors, microchips, and other so-called "high value" electronic products all have military applications in modern warfare. While obvious weapons like missiles and bombs might not be on the table, it would be naive of us to assume that none of the potential products of Pax Silica in the Philippines will be used in the US's ongoing and future war efforts. In fact, BCDA itself apparently cannot categorically state that the project’s products will not be used for war in the long term, stating only that the Pax Silica ESZ “is intended” for commercial products only.
Prof. Giovanni Tapang, PhD, spokesperson of AGHAM: "The BCDA and the Marcos Jr. administration are clearly desperate to whitewash their environmentally destructive and unsustainable Pax Silica project with the United States. The facts are clear — a project of this scale will invariably impact local farming communities negatively, and will not present any clear, long-term opportunities for the genuine development of our country. Like so many projects before it, Pax Silica will only maintain our dependence on foreign companies and their technologies, while Filipinos are stuck with the backbreaking menial labor and the massive environmental cost. Instead of lopsided agreements with a warmongering imperialist power, what we need is a robust national industrialization policy that prioritizes the products Filipinos actually need — food, provision of social services, among many other things — placing people and planet first over profit." #
Sources:
Claim 1
https://capas.gov.ph/socio-economic
Capas Municipal Agriculture Office with ongoing projects for Capas farmers: https://www.facebook.com/p/CAPAS-Municipal-Agriculture-Office-100069022126143/
Pokus Gitnang Luson report on residents affected by Pax Silica: https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=1640071054792028
Claim 2
https://www.latitudemedia.com/news/the-data-center-boom-is-a-diesel-generator-boom/
Calculation of land area for solar energy requirements based on MTerra Solar Project data: https://meralcopowergen.com.ph/mterra-solar-project-breaks-ground-a-monumental-milestone-in-the-philippines-renewable-energy-transition/
Projected Pax Silica ESZ energy consumption: https://www.abs-cbn.com/news/business/2026/7/24/pax-silica-to-build-own-power-sources-to-cover-3-gigawatt-energy-needs-bcda-0000
https://business.inquirer.net/596398/pax-silicas-mammoth-power-needs-draw-maharlika-foreign-interest
Claim 3
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy8gy7lv448o
Claim 4
Compare to job creation in other data centers: https://thecurrentga.org/2026/07/22/20-billion-openai-data-center-to-open-in-effingham-county/
Foxconn India job creation: https://www.indiatoday.in/business/story/foxconn-women-led-iphone-plant-hires-30000-staff-in-record-india-hiring-2839669-2025-12-22
Involvement of Chinese and Taiwanese workers in Foxconn India plant: https://restofworld.org/2025/china-foxconn-factoriesfoxconn-stops-sending-chinese-workers-to-india-iphone-factories/v
Claim 5
AI use in US war on Iran: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/3/11/us-military-confirms-use-of-advanced-ai-tools-in-war-against-iran