06/06/2026
As councillors work through the Long Term Plan, much of the discussion has focused on what projects, facilities, and services the council would like to deliver over the coming years.
Several councillors campaigned on promises to improve affordability and exercise greater fiscal restraint, acknowledging that difficult decisions would be required to bring rates growth under control. From the community's perspective, however, there has been little visible evidence of those difficult conversations taking place.
But what if we started with a different question?
What level of rates increase is actually affordable for the community?
In our latest article, we explore an alternative approach to budgeting. Rather than starting with a list of projects and then calculating the rates increases needed to fund them, councillors could start by setting an affordability target (for example 5%, 10%, or 15%) and then ask staff to identify what projects, services, or spending would need to be delayed, reduced, or removed to achieve it.
This is how most households manage their budgets. They start with what they can afford and then prioritise accordingly.
We've also written to councillors asking them to consider this approach as part of the Long Term Plan process. We believe it would provide greater transparency about the trade-offs involved and help ensure affordability remains at the centre of decision-making.
If affordability is genuinely a priority, councillors need to be shown the choices, not just the projects.
Read the article here: https://qtownlakescommunityaction.substack.com/p/stop-asking-what-we-want-start-asking
What do you think? Should council start with what it wants to do, or with what the community can afford to pay?
The real question isn't what projects are worthwhile. It's which ones are worth the rates increases required to fund them.