17/04/2026
The recording of the Council workshop on the RPMP is available on YouTube at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gAN156ToLnc
We suggest you listen to council manager Imogen Bassett's introduction prior to the discussion of cats and golden clams.
The presentation and discussion on w**ds management start at about 52m and take up the remaining 40 minutes.
There is reference to the AIWG's submissions to Council and council manager Sam Hill refers to the meetings she has had with AIWG.
However there is still a focus on what Council can and can't do within the existing framework. If I understood the discussion correctly, Council is saying that to avoid the reduction of the 500m scope of the current RPMP buffer zones, would require a budget ot $5m. This is hard to understand. It would be useful to see the information behind this assessment.
While Council says that the w**d control spend by local boards is taken into account in estimating the budget for the RPMP plans, it's not clear how this is done. And there was no mention of the estimated value of volunteer work and their community engagement.
An interesting point raised by one councillor was about keeping the door open for increased fine levels to be introduced under the revised Biosecurity Act and for any revenue from these fines to be applied to w**d control.
The focus of the discussion was on protecting native biodiversity in high value reserves; there was limited reference to the general issues of the nuisance to neighbours and local reserves from "w**d factories" such as abandoned orchards or absentee landlords.
There was also acknowledgement of the fact that paricularly in rural land Council and government are the major offenders in having woolly nightshade, MP etc on pubilc land. And that it's hard to tell land owners to clean up their property if official agencies aren't managing theirs.
There's a trap here which needs to be avoided. If Council takes the approach that it will only address 100m round a small number of reserves with high ecological value, then essentially NOTHING will get done in the long term.
It would be better to start with the proposition of what can be done to work progressively towards a high level of w**d control to protect our ecology, agriculture, horticulture and private land.
Then to develop a plan that works progressively towards those goals on a step wise basis.
If you have the time and interest that you could contribute to the work of the AIWG as we discuss these issues with Council, please get in touch.
Warning: don't rely on the transcript of the conversation - it regularly mis-spells not only te reo words but also words like "w**ds".