Jude Fundamental Human Right's And Social Justice Initiative

Jude Fundamental Human Right's And Social Justice Initiative we are prominent HUMAN RIGHT'S ADVOCACY GROUP. we are a cohesive community within the realms of JUSTICE FAIRNESS and EQUITY. (ARBITRATION CHAMBERS).

our believe is INJUSTICE ANYWHERE is a threat to JUSTICE everywhere.

Nigeria is a Muslim country, and if you do not wish to embrace a Muslim–Muslim ticket, then you should depart from Niger...
11/08/2026

Nigeria is a Muslim country, and if you do not wish to embrace a Muslim–Muslim ticket, then you should depart from Nigeria—because it belongs to us.”
— Sheikh Yahaya Jingir
The remark has elicited widespread reactions; however, it is important to place the legal position in proper perspective.
Nigeria is neither a Christian state nor a Muslim state. It is a secular federation, and the Constitution does not entrench any religion as the religion of the state.
Indeed, Section 10 of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria provides that: “The Government of the Federation or of a State shall not adopt any religion as State Religion.”
Furthermore, Section 38 safeguards every person’s freedom to hold, adopt, or change a religion or belief, and to manifest and practise the same.
Thus, while individuals and groups may legitimately advocate for a Muslim–Muslim ticket, a Christian–Christian ticket, or any other political configuration, no religious community may lawfully claim exclusive ownership of Nigeria on the basis of faith alone.
Nigeria belongs to all Nigerians—Muslims, Christians, adherents of traditional religions, and those who profess no religion at all.

I remain steadfast in my advocacy comrade Jude.

KNOW YOUR RIGHTS. Tenant, your landlord can serve you notice to quit through WhatsApp. Your landlord can serve you notic...
02/08/2026

KNOW YOUR RIGHTS.

Tenant, your landlord can serve you notice to quit through WhatsApp.

Your landlord can serve you notice of increment through WhatsApp.

Your landlord can also serve your any other letters through your WhatsApp.

Ignoring that notice or letter to quit served on you through WhatsApp does not make it invalid.

You better respond to it and chat your landlord up and have a good conversation with him.

That notice to quit served on you is hundred percent valid in the eyes of the law.

I remain resolute in my capacity as an Advocate Comrade Jude.

KNOW YOUR RIGHTS NIGERIANS:In Nigeria, bail is granted without charge, and you cannot be arrested for serving as a suret...
19/07/2026

KNOW YOUR RIGHTS NIGERIANS:

In Nigeria, bail is granted without charge, and you cannot be arrested for serving as a surety for any suspect who committed an offence and subsequently absconded after being released from custody.

Offense as quoted: Attempted Burglary or Attempted Stealing.Attempted Burglary - Section 412, Criminal Code Act Breaking...
10/07/2026

Offense as quoted:

Attempted Burglary or Attempted Stealing.

Attempted Burglary - Section 412, Criminal Code Act
Breaking into a house at night with intent to steal is called Burglary.

Since he wanted to break in but didn’t succeed, it’s Attempted Burglary in law.

Punishment: Up to 7 years imprisonment.

Attempted Stealing - Section 390 (9), Criminal Code Act
Trying to steal but didn’t take anything.

Punishment: Up to 3 years imprisonment.

Important Age 16:

In Nigeria, 16 is still a child under Child Rights Act 2003.

He won’t go to adult prison on convention.

He’ll be taken to Family Court or Juvenile Court.

Punishment is usually: Caution, Community service, or Borstal Institution, not regular prison.

What The House Owner Did - Hitting His Hands.

This is called: Self Defence or Lawful Defense of Property.

Section 287, Criminal Code Act.

A person is justified in using force to defend his house/property against an unlawful entry, as long as the force is reasonable that is the law in Nigeria.

I remain steadfast in my advocacy.

Comrade Jude.

Bail is Complimentary under the Law in Nigeria.One of the most frequently encountered statements at police stations is t...
03/07/2026

Bail is Complimentary under the Law in Nigeria.

One of the most frequently encountered statements at police stations is this:

“If you seek bail, provide monetary compensation.

However, the truth that the law implores you to acknowledge is that bail is complimentary.

Both the Constitution and the Police Act unequivocally render it unlawful for any police officer to solicit funds prior to granting bail.

Should an officer demand payment, it is not merely “procedure,” but rather extortion under the law.

So, why does the law assert that bail is complimentary?

Because bail is not a commodity.

It is an inherent right.

The essence of bail is straightforward: to facilitate the provisional release of an individual who has been apprehended, while ensuring their subsequent appearance to address the allegations against them.

Consequently, what the police are authorized to request is not financial remuneration, but a surety—someone who will vouch for your appearance when necessitated.

Does this imply that bail is invariably granted?

Not necessarily.

The police possess the authority to grant bail for minor infractions (termed bailable offences).

For grave transgressions such as armed robbery, homicide, or capital offences, only a court possesses the jurisdiction to grant bail.

Nevertheless, in all instances where the law stipulates that bail is permissible, no monetary exchange should transpire.

Bail is complimentary because your liberty is not a commodity.

Bail is complimentary because the Constitution safeguards you from unlawful detention.

Bail is complimentary because justice ought not to be auctioned to the highest bidder in Nigeria.

Thus, the next time someone endeavors to persuade you to “pay for bail,” remember that the law stands in your favor.

Bail is your right, not a commercial transaction.

I remain your devoted activist,
Comrade Jude.

24/06/2026

IS NIGERIA A COUNTRY!

Bandit are passing Police check point while the police are waving on them.

22/06/2026

UNPROFESSIONAL CCONDUCT OF NIGERIAN DSS:

We condemn what can be described as a commando-style operation conducted within the precincts of a courtroom in Abuja, Nigeria.

Mr. Omoyele Sowore—an eminent Nigerian human rights activist, pro-democracy campaigner, and journalist—has informed us through credible channels that he was abruptly detained by operatives of the Department of State Services (DSS), despite the fact that he was already present for court proceedings.

The DSS, saddled with responsibility for the prevention and detection of threats to Nigeria’s internal security, has repeatedly failed in its mandate in Nigeria.

Instead of safeguarding the nation effectively, it appears incapable of confronting serious internal dangers, even as Boko Haram and ISIS-aligned jihadist militants continue to plan and execute their operations—often unchecked—while their strength is displayed at the expense of innocent, helpless Nigerians.

We condemn the arrest and demand his urgent release.

We also caution and admonish the DSS to operate within the confines of the law, and to cease actions that risk pushing Nigeria toward lawlessness and international disgrace.

Mr. Sowore has been remanded in Kuje Correctional Centre.

I remain steadfast in my advocacy for the protection of human rights in Nigeria.

I am COMRADE JUDE.

After a Decade of Investigation and Prosecution, Diezani Alison-Madueke Walks FreeFor more than ten years, Diezani Aliso...
19/06/2026

After a Decade of Investigation and Prosecution, Diezani Alison-Madueke Walks Free
For more than ten years, Diezani Alison-Madueke has been at the centre of a sprawling international pursuit by authorities.

Across multiple jurisdictions, investigators traced alleged wrongdoing to her, assets and properties said to be connected to her were seized, and formal court proceedings were launched.

Efforts to secure her extradition were also pursued—while anti-corruption agencies spent years piecing together evidence and assembling the prosecution case.

Then, on 17 June 2026, a jury at Southwark Crown Court in Londond elivered a verdict that many observers had not anticipated.

Diezani Alison-Madueke—former Minister of Petroleum Resources and former President of OPEC—was found NOT GUILTY on all six charges brought against her.

She faced allegations that, while serving in government between 2010 and 2015, she accepted bribes from individuals in the oil and gas sector.

Prosecutors claimed that, in return for influence over oil-related contracts, she benefited materially through a range of luxury indulgences, including expensive accommodation, private jet travel, shopping excursions, and other lavish gifts.

From the outset, Alison-Madueke rejected the allegations.

Her legal team maintained that she neither awarded the contracts in question nor solicited any bribes, arguing further that the prosecution had failed to establish the essential criminal linkage required for conviction under the law.

After months of testimony and evidence, and following more than 46 hours of deliberation, the jury returned a unanimous acquittalon every count.

Her co-defendants were cleared as well.

With this decision, one of Nigeria’s most closely watched—and internationally prominent—anti-corruption prosecutions has effectively come to an end.

However, it is important to understand what the judgment signifies.

A criminal court does not convict an individual simply because the allegations are grave, or because the matter has attracted intense public attention, or because the investigation endured for years.

Under the law, guilt must be proved beyond reasonable doubt.

Where that evidentiary threshold is not met, the accused is entitled to an acquittal—regardless of how compelling the allegations may appear in the court of public opinion.

I remain steadfast in my advocacy and resolute in my conviction.

Comrade Jude.

16/06/2026

Over 3000 Repentant Boko-haram members swearing that they’ve completely dissociated themselves from any form of extremism.

Should they be given a second chance back into the society?

🎥: NTA Network.

What a country.

Nigeria we moved with repentant criminal's.

12/06/2026

IT’S YOUR RIGHT: Yes, You Can Film a Police Officer While Eating or Doing Other Things in Public.

In response to some of the comments that followed my earlier post about ASP Newton, it is important to examine this matter through the combined lens of Nigerian law and digital ethics.

You have a right to record police officers—but there is a crucial distinction between filming for accountability and uploading or circulating content for ridicule, harassment, or cyberbullying.

Section 39 of the 1999 Constitution guarantees freedom of expression, including the right to receive and share information.

The Nigeria Police have also consistently indicated that members of the public may record officers performing their duties, provided the recording does not interfere with or obstruct the officer from carrying out lawful responsibilities.

An officer in uniform carrying out duties in a public space does not enjoy the same level of privacy as someone within the confines of a private residence.

For that reason, filming officers at checkpoints, during arrests, and even while they are eating or resting in public areas is generally not unlawful.

RECORDING AN OFFICER WHILE EATING IN A PUBLIC PLACE IS NOT ILLEGAL.

There is no legislation that broadly prohibits you from recording what is visible in public.

The real question, however, arises after the recording—particularly how the footage is being used.

For instance: capturing an officer eating in public may be permissible, but posting the video online solely to mock the officer’s appearance, eating habits, or personal dignity may cross the threshold into cyberbullying and unlawful harassment.

If you operate a food establishment and genuinely suspect that an officer may refuse to pay after finishing his meal—perhaps as a way of evading payment—you may record for evidence.

Yet once your concern is resolved and the officer pays and leaves without incident, there is little justification for retaining or circulating the video.

The ethical principle is simple: recording should not be driven by humiliation.

It should serve a legitimate purposes.

You may also share videos when an officer commits misconduct such as extortion, assault, threats, or abuse of power.

In such cases, the recording should be used for lawful complaints and public accountability.

Where there is genuine public interest, it outweighs an individual’s embarrassment.

Conversely, it is improper—and may be unlawful—to release a video of someone merely eating or resting peacefully.

Cameras can strengthen accountability when used responsibly.

Know your rights.

Know your limits.

Record for justice, not wickedness.

I remain steadfast in my advocacy.

Comrade Jude.

Address

Ibadan
200005

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Jude Fundamental Human Right's And Social Justice Initiative posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Organization

Send a message to Jude Fundamental Human Right's And Social Justice Initiative:

Shortcuts

Share