MPC - Project Management Community

Call Website Contact the organization

MPC - Project Management Community Contact information, map and directions, contact form, opening hours, services, ratings, photos, videos and announcements from MPC - Project Management Community, Community Center, LEVEL 22, A-12 PINNACLE PETALING JAYA, Petaling Jaya.

🟡 Job Vacancy – Project ManagerEmployer: IT company Location: Petaling Jaya, MalaysiaEmployment: 6-Month ContractPackage...
28/08/2026

🟡 Job Vacancy – Project Manager

Employer: IT company
Location: Petaling Jaya, Malaysia
Employment: 6-Month Contract
Package: RM6,000 – RM10,000/month
(Depending on experience & suitability)

Key Responsibilities
• Plan, monitor and manage projects to ensure timely delivery within scope and available resources
• Manage project costs, budgets and milestone payment collection
• Monitor project risks, issues and dependencies
• Coordinate project teams and stakeholders
• Coach and guide team members on Project Management practices
• Maintain proper project governance, documentation and PM standards

Preferred Profile
• Strong project planning, monitoring and documentation skills
• Good people and stakeholder management skills
• Strong risk management mindset
• Good written and verbal communication in English
• Able to conduct client/management presentations
• Practical knowledge of PMI / PMBOK is an advantage
• ⁠PMP certification is an added advantage
• Experience in Banking, Insurance or Financial Services is an added advantage

MPC Talent Matching Service – How to Apply:�
Step 1: Pay RM100 to P2P Talent Development PLT
(1) TT to HLB 19300073329
(2) TnG: https://payment.tngdigital.com.my/sc/bDLnxeMQNE
Step 2: WhatsApp your payment slip to https://wa.me/60164194343
Step 3: Upon confirmation, you will be introduced directly to the hiring decision-maker for further engagement.

How It Works:
1. You apply via MPC Talent Matching Service
2. We verify your background and brief you with insider intel
3. You are connected directly with the named recruiter or decision-maker
4. You receive ongoing support during the shortlisting phase

What You’ll Get:
* Direct engagement with hiring decision-maker (not intermediary HR)
* Featured application status
* Additional context on hiring expectations and team structure
📌 Join MPC Talent Matching Group: https://chat.whatsapp.com/DOcPNRzo4O3Ia2Z5lFrMOx

Terms & Conditions:
�The RM100 talent matching service fee covers application handling, candidate briefing, and direct engagement facilitation. It does not guarantee interview or placement. Final hiring decisions are at the discretion of the employer. Fee is non refundable.

Contact Information:�
O’ Neil LIM
�Malaysia Project Management Community (MPC.org.my)
WhatsApp: 016 419 4343
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/mscpmp/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/13447474

AI can help organisations move faster.But speed alone does not guarantee responsible progress.The environmental cost of ...
02/08/2026

AI can help organisations move faster.

But speed alone does not guarantee responsible progress.

The environmental cost of AI is growing through energy demand, data centres, cooling systems, hardware lifecycles and carbon emissions.

Its social impact is changing education, employment, professional competence, privacy and access.

Its governance challenges raise harder questions:

Who is accountable?

What evidence is sufficient?

Who approves the final decision when AI is involved?

Join business, technology, project management, education and sustainability professionals at:

MPC Forum 2026 — The ESG of AI

19 October 2026, Monday
1:00 PM – 5:00 PM
UOB Plaza 1, Kuala Lumpur

Event fee: RM50 per person. Payment instructions will be provided upon registration.

View the full programme and register through the event website:

www.events.mpc.org.my/esgofai

Is your management still waiting on the "best practice" decision?Our 2nd ISO 14064-1 Certificate of Practice (CoP) has j...
20/07/2026

Is your management still waiting on the "best practice" decision?

Our 2nd ISO 14064-1 Certificate of Practice (CoP) has just wrapped at University of Technology Sarawak — and if your organisation is still deciding what "best practice" carbon accounting looks like, this room says something: everyone else has stopped waiting and started doing.

In the group: sustainability leads from listed companies, a team from Penang's largest precision manufacturing player, representatives from Sabah's largest NGO and its largest government foundation, a secretariat firm from Johor servicing PLCs, plus academics from Malaysian and international universities. Second cohort, still not a beginner's room — people who need this working for their organisations and clients, now.

They committed their own time and funds to be there — flew in to Sibu, some for the first time, and spent that evening preparing for the next day's opening with the UTS VC.

Here's what most companies underestimate: getting a GHG inventory "right" isn't the hard part. Getting the data is. We built a training case study earlier this year — a fictional practitioner's first real inventory — and it nails the pain points almost every organisation hits: missing utility bills, an untraceable technician, staff who don't understand why anyone's asking about their commute, an owner unaware his delivery riders count toward his own emissions. None of it is exotic. It's just unglamorous — and why so many companies stall, sitting on the data while management deliberates, until a client or regulator forces the question anyway.

This CoP exists to force that decision inside three days instead of three quarters. From the opening session, teams split for site visits across UTS facilities — identifying real emission sources firsthand, not textbook examples. Back in the project room, that data became a structured inventory report, presented to the VC on Day 3 for direct feedback before offsite write-up continued.

Each step was supported by P2P supervisors on the ground, giving real-time input at the moments that actually shape whether an inventory survives verification — not feedback after the fact. That's the real target: not just a report, but an audit-ready one — every assumption documented, every exclusion justified, every number traceable to source.

Every team went home with Sibu's iconic kek lapis — less an award, more a shared taste of the place they'd just spent three intensive days in. Supervisors passed around local fruits too. Day 4 wound down at Sibu Central Market — many candidates' first time in Sibu at all.

Huge credit to the UTS team for the coordination that got this cohort to a first draft by Day 3, second time running.

Next: ISO 14064-3 CoP in August — a different cohort verifies this same inventory, independently.



It started with a report that looked perfect.Formatted. Cited. Ready to send. Maya checked it once, gave it a final glan...
29/06/2026

It started with a report that looked perfect.

Formatted. Cited. Ready to send. Maya checked it once, gave it a final glance, and almost hit send. Four errors were hiding inside it — AI wrote them confidently, and confidently, almost no one caught them.

Until someone did.

That's the moment Programme 1 — AI for Practitioner — is built around. Not teaching you to distrust AI. Teaching you to catch what a confident answer gets wrong, before it ever leaves your hands. 📅 5 Aug 2026 | M*F Inc Tower, KLCC

Months later, the stakes got bigger.

A tender reached the boardroom. AI had already made half the decision — quietly, informally, across two or three departments, with no one checking outputs against anything. Then someone in the room asked the question every leader eventually faces: who checked this?

Silence.

That's where Programme 2 — AI Governance & Advanced Practice — picks up.
Not the tool. The audit trail, the controls, the board-ready policy that means the answer already exists before the question is asked.
📅 9 Sept 2026 | M*F Inc Tower, KLCC

It's fiction. The questions underneath aren't.

Two programmes. One series. From personal judgement to organisational accountability — the same arc Maya's story follows, one decision at a time.

GenAI for Practitioner — Programme #1
AI Governance and Advanced Practice — Programme #2

✅ HRDC SBL-Khas Claimable
✅ ISO/IEC 42001 & PDPA 2010-aligned | 1 Day each | 9AM–5PM

👉 Register: [http://www.event.mpc.org.my/genai]
📩 [email protected] | 📲 016-419 4343



Two intakes left. Then we're done for 2026.MPC Workshop: Carbon Accounting & GHG Inventories (ISO 14064-1) | SGS Certifi...
18/06/2026

Two intakes left. Then we're done for 2026.

MPC Workshop: Carbon Accounting & GHG Inventories (ISO 14064-1) | SGS Certified — 21–23 Sept
MPC Workshop: GHG Verification Practitioner (ISO 14064-3) | SGS Certified — 19–21 Oct
Majestic Hotel KL · HRDC Claimable

June cohort just closed. 18 people. Same problem, different companies.
Full story on LinkedIn if you want context.

Questions → WhatsApp O’ Neil 60164194343



Over the past 20 months of running our Tuesday & Thursday preview sessions, I’ve sat with sustainability managers, audit...
01/06/2026

Over the past 20 months of running our Tuesday & Thursday preview sessions, I’ve sat with sustainability managers, auditors, and Main Market-listed MDs. And honestly? Some of the conversations are painful to hear.
Many of you have asked: “Is Uncle Stanley real?”
The answer is yes — and no. He’s not one person. He’s a composite. A consolidated story built from real DMs, late-night WhatsApp voice notes, and kopitiam conversations with executives who shared the same quiet confession:
“I paid RM380,000 for this ESG report. But when my German customer asked — ‘Where does this number come from?’ — I looked at my own report… and realised I didn’t know.”
Not the methodology. Not the assumptions. Not the evidence.
Just a thick, beautifully designed document they couldn’t defend.
This isn’t an isolated case. It’s the exact gap we keep seeing across Malaysia:
❌ Reports that look complete but collapse under one verifier question
❌ Sustainability teams handed a polished deliverable with no training on how to check it
❌ Practitioners learning the hard way that theory ≠ field reality
Carbon verification isn’t mastered through recordings or chat boxes. It’s built through live scenario pressure-testing. Through debating professional judgment. Through practicing the exact questions European buyers and ISO 14064-3 verifiers will ask:
“Where is the evidence?”
“How did you document this gap?”
“Why does this assumption hold?”
A weak inventory cannot survive verification. But a prepared team can walk into any audit room with confidence.
That’s what we build at MPC. Not just certificate holders. Practitioners who know how to defend their numbers.
If you’re rebuilding GHG capability, preparing for assurance, or just tired of reports you can’t explain — I’d love to have you in the room.
🔹 Live preview: Every Tue & Thu, 8:30pm MYT
🔹 Capped at 10 → link in comment
🔹 Prefer to talk first? Comment 1-1 or DM me directly.
P.S. The next time someone asks you about your carbon data, you’ll know exactly what to say. Because you’ll have the evidence. 👇
Full story here: https://event.mpc.org.my/mslimcarbonstory

“I paid RM380k for this report… and I didn’t know where the numbers came from.” 😳This is the exact scenario we tackled i...
30/05/2026

“I paid RM380k for this report… and I didn’t know where the numbers came from.” 😳

This is the exact scenario we tackled in our ISO 14064-3 Lead Verifier workshop this week.

Just like “Ms. Lim” learned in the field, a thick sustainability report means nothing if you can’t answer: “Where is the evidence?”

MPC chose face-to-face training on purpose. Because carbon verification isn’t mastered through slides or chat boxes. It’s built through:
✅ Live scenario debates
✅ Real data gap troubleshooting
✅ Practitioners who’ve been audited & know what survives

We don’t just teach you to calculate emissions. We teach you to defend them.
🔹 Preview session: Every Tue & Thu, 8:30pm
🔹 Only 10 spots → Link in comment
🔹 Want 1-to-1? Comment 1-1 👇

*p/s: host sponsored Eco Farms's premium Japanese NIKKO Grade Hikari.

29/05/2026

RM380,000 for a carbon report—but can your team defend the data?
Uncle Stanley’s German buyer asked for ISO 14064-3 verification. He didn't have it. He lost the deal.
Don't let a lack of 'audit-ready' skills stall your business. Malaysia’s 2027 Bursa mandate is coming, and the demand for qualified Lead Verifiers is already outpacing supply.
Get the skills to turn theory into evidence.
✅ Real-world project work.
✅ Dual Certification Pathway.
✅ Internationally benchmarked.
Join our FREE Zoom preview: Tuesday & Thursday, 8:30pm.
Register below for exclusive preview pricing.

Uncle Stanley spent RM380,000 on carbon — and still couldn't answer one questionAs a project manager, you already know t...
28/05/2026

Uncle Stanley spent RM380,000 on carbon — and still couldn't answer one question

As a project manager, you already know the feeling: you're handed something built by someone else, and you're the one who has to stand behind it when the hard questions come.

Carbon reporting has quietly become exactly that kind of project.

Over the past few months, MPC has run several preview sessions on ISO 14064 carbon accounting and verification — with listed-company directors, sustainability managers, and individual professionals. One pattern came up again and again: organisations already have a report, sometimes an expensive one, but nobody can confidently answer what every project manager learns to ask first — where's the evidence? What's the basis for this number? Will it hold up when someone independent reviews it?

That's not a sustainability problem. That's a scope, documentation, and assurance problem — the kind you already manage every day on other projects. The standard just isn't written in a language you've been trained in yet.
We turned what we observed into a short story: Ms. Lim's Carbon Diary. It follows a practitioner through exactly these moments — inherited numbers, missing documentation, a deadline set by someone who doesn't care that the data isn't ready. Familiar territory. Worth ten minutes:

https://event.mpc.org.my/mslimcarbonstory

If you want to add this to your own toolkit, both our ISO 14064-1 (Carbon Accounting) and ISO 14064-3 (Lead Verifier) intakes are now open. The pathway runs the way you'd scope any capability build — 14064-1 to ground you in the inventory side, CoP to apply it on a real case, then 14064-3 to take you to Lead Verifier level. It also lines up well ahead of the Bursa NSRF Group 1 mandatory assurance window.

Self-sponsored individuals save up to RM2,000 on the full bundle (14064-1 + CoP + 14064-3).

Happy to talk through which entry point fits your situation, HRDC claim mechanics, or the bundle.

WhatsApp me directly:
https://wa.me/60164194343

#140641





@

Ms Lim's Carbon Diary Episode 7 — Uncle Stanley's ProblemUncle Stanley arrived first. He was always early. Fifty-eight y...
27/05/2026

Ms Lim's Carbon Diary
Episode 7 — Uncle Stanley's Problem

Uncle Stanley arrived first.

He was always early.

Fifty-eight years old. Managing Director of Stanfield Industries Berhad — a Main Market-listed manufacturer of precision-machined industrial components. Two factories in Shah Alam, one in Meru. Customers in Germany, the Netherlands, and Sweden. Annual turnover: RM500 million. Golf handicap: eleven.

Mood that morning: not good.

He had already finished half his kopi-o before Ms Lim walked through the door.

She was seven minutes late.

She saw him from across the kopitiam — the kind of man who takes up the whole table without spreading anything out. Folderclosed. Hands flat. Watching the door.

She apologised. Ordered teh tarik. Sat down.

Uncle David's WhatsApp from the week before had been brief:

"Stanley, this girl — she knows what she is doing. Properly trained. Not like your consultant people who send one junior staff and then disappear."

Uncle Stanley studied her for exactly three seconds.

Then he pushed a manila folder across the table without a word.

She looked down.

Stanfield Industries Berhad — ESG and Sustainability Report, Financial Year 2025. Big consulting firm logo. Very thick. The expensive kind.

Uncle Stanley tapped the cover once with one finger.

Uncle Stanley: You know how much I paid for this one?

She did not guess.

Uncle Stanley: RM380,000.

He let that sit for a moment.

A businessman's pause. Deliberate.

Uncle Stanley: You know what I hate most?

Ms Lim waited.

He rubbed his forehead and looked down at his coffee.

Uncle Stanley: Not the money.

Another pause.

Uncle Stanley: Last month I sat in front of my German customer. Very senior people. They asked me — where does this number come from? What is your methodology? Can your verifier speak to our team?

He gave a short, humourless laugh.

Uncle Stanley: I looked at my own report. RM380,000 report. And I realised —

He looked at her directly.

Uncle Stanley: I didn't know.

The kopitiam noise continued around them. Coffee cups. Plates. A delivery rider arguing with the cashier. Morning going about its business, indifferent.

Ms Lim picked up the report carefully — the way youhandle something expensive that has already been damaged.

Three minutes on the methodology pages.

The numbers themselves were not what worried her.

It was the empty spaces between the numbers. Missing assumptions. Missing source citations. A figure here with no reference. An estimate there with no basis written down.

She closed the report.

Ms Lim: Uncle Stanley, I think you have three separate problems.

Uncle Stanley: Go ahead lah.

Ms Lim: First — preparation and assurance are two different things. The firm that builds the inventory cannot also verify it. Independence must be real, not just written in a
proposal.

Uncle Stanley: They quoted me another RM180,000 for assurance. Same firm.

He said it without blinking. He already knew whatthat meant. He just wanted to hear her say it.

Ms Lim: Then that assurance would not be worth the paper it's printed on. A customer like yours will know the difference.

Uncle Stanley nodded slowly. Not surprised. Satisfied that she had said it plainly.

Ms Lim: Second — your customer is not asking for a report. They are asking for confidence. Those are not the same thing.

She paused.

Ms Lim: And third — I don't think anyone properly built the inventory underneath this report. A report can look complete and still have nothing solid to stand on. When someone asks a hard question — where does this number come from, what is the evidence — the answer has to be in the documentation. Not in someone's memory.

Uncle Stanley stared at her for a moment.

Uncle Stanley: David's restaurant also same situation?

Ms Lim: Same principles. Very different scale.

Uncle Stanley: Restaurant and RM500 million manufacturer — same? Ms Lim: Same questions. Different consequences.

She said it steadily.

What is actually happening in Malaysia right now

She turned to a fresh page and drew a table. She had developedthis habit from the training — any complex situation, show the person where they are standing. (refer image)

She turned the notebook toward him.

Ms Lim: Stanfield sits here. And here.

She pointed at two rows. Main Market. EU exporter.

Ms Lim: Both atthe same time. You don't have the luxury of solving one and waiting on the other.

Uncle Stanley lookedat the table for a long time.

Uncle Stanley: So everyone catching up mode lah.

Ms Lim: Everyone. The difference is who starts properly now and who waits until the verifier is already in the room.

Uncle Stanley: And my report — it doesn't help me catch up?

Ms Lim: Not if the foundation is not solid. A verifier doesn't read the report first. They ask for the evidence behind the report.

She thought about Albert sitting across from her in late 2025, going through Uncle David's Smokewood Grill inventory page by page. His first question had not been about the numbers at all.

It had been: where is the evidence?

She had walked into that session confident. She had walked out quieter, and considerably better prepared.

Uncle Stanley leaned back. Crossed his arms.

Uncle Stanley: So what do I do now?

Ms Lim: Someone needs to go through the existing numbers properly. Find what is missing. Fix what can be fixed. Then engage an independent party — someone trained in GHG verification — to review it. Not the firm that prepared it.

Uncle Stanley: Where to find such a person in Malaysia now?

Ms Lim: The pool is still small. But it is growing. My trainer runs the ISO 14064-1 programme — the next intake is in June, Majestic Hotel KL. That is the right foundation for your sustainability team. After that, the Certificate of Practice at UTS Sarawak — that is where classroom becomes real. That is where I learned the most.

She meant it.

Three days in July 2025 at UTS Sibu. The morning her group discovered the electricity sub- metering records did not cover one of the buildings. The decision about how to estimate, how to document, how to defend the assumption when someone who did not make it asks why.

That was not in any textbook.

Uncle Stanley: And the verification side?

Ms Lim: That comes after the inventory is correct. First things first.

Uncle Stanley noddedonce. Processed. Filed.

Uncle Stanley:You can help or not?

The question arrivedfaster than she expected.

She looked at thefolder on the table.

She thought aboutSmokewood Grill. One kitchen. One owner who called her David's restaurant friend. Electricitybillsin a plastic folder.

She thought aboutStanfield Industries. Three factories. European customers with senior procurement teamswho asked precise questions. Bursa obligations. A sustainability manager named Farah — she had looked her up the night before — B.Sc. Environmental Science, three years at a regional consultancy, now handling all of Stanfield's ESG reporting alone.

Farah has been doing this by herself. Three factories. One person. She probably thinks she's doing it right because nobody has shown her what right looks like.

I know that feeling.

A small voice said: you arenot ready for this.

A louder one said: but youare the one sitting here.

She took a breath.

Ms Lim: I can help.

Pause.

Ms Lim: But for something your size, I want to be honest with you. I would need to work with my trainer — someone with manufacturing experience behind them. I don't want to walk in confident, take the job, and then not be able to answer the questions your verifier will ask.

She looked at him.

Ms Lim: I don't want to be the junior staff who disappears.

Uncle Stanley stared at her.

He's calculating. Not angry. Calculating.

One second. Two.

Then he laughed. A proper one. First time that morning.

Uncle Stanley: Honest lah.

He stood up and extended his hand across the table.

Uncle Stanley: OK. That works for me. Get your trainer involved. I want this done before my next customer meeting. You have until end of June.

She shook hishand.

On the drive home

ederal Highway. Fortyminutes. The kind of slow crawl where you move thirty metres, stop, move thirty metres.

She thought about Uncle Stanley's face when he said I didn't know.

A man who ran a RM500 million company. Who had sat in front of European procurement teams and held his ground. Who had a golf handicap of eleven and arrived at breakfast before the coffee was hot.

Looking at his own report.

Not knowing.

She thought about Farah. Environmental Science degree. Three yearsof consultancy experience. Now sitting inside Stanfield Industries alone, managing ESG for threefactories, probably filing reports into a system she did not design and defending numbers shedid not calculate.

She has been handed a RM380,000 report and told: this is correct.

Nobody told her to check.

Nobody told her how.

Ms Lim knew that feeling exactly. Standing in the training room in February 2025 thinking she understood everything. Then standing in Uncle David's kitchen three weeks later, asking Hafiz about electricity billswhile the lunch crowd came in, realising she understood the theory and had no idea about thereality.

The June intake. Shewould tell Farah about it tonight. Not as a sales pitch. As one person telling another: this is whatchanged things for me.

Would she listen? Maybe. Maybe she's been waiting for someone to say: here is how it actually works.

The car in front moved. She moved. End of June.

Three factories.

Same method.

Different consequences.

Same thing the verifier will ask first. Where is the evidence?

To be continued — Episode 8: Ms Lim meets Farah.

The factory floor is a different world from a restaurant kitchen. But missing data looks exactly the same.

#14064

Address

LEVEL 22, A-12 PINNACLE PETALING JAYA
Petaling Jaya
46200

Telephone

+60164194343

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when MPC - Project Management Community posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Organization

Send a message to MPC - Project Management Community:

Shortcuts

Share