25/03/2026
March 23, 2026 - Public Consultations on the Draft of the Rules of Procedure of the Parliament of Moldova
On 23 March, the Legal Committee for Appointments and Immunities held public consultations on the draft Rules of Procedure of the Parliament of Moldova — a document that shapes how democracy works in practice. The Rules of Procedure of the Parliament is an issue that Brussels is following closely. Progress in adopting the Rules of Procedure is essential for the effective functioning of democratic institutions, particularly in the context of EU accession. Since the beginning of the Twinning Project, one of the core activities is the comprehensive assessment of the Rules of Procedure and the development of concrete amendment proposals to further strengthen the institutional capacity, efficiency and transparency of the Parliament of the Republic of Moldova. Clear and transparent procedures make legislative work more predictable, strengthen accountability, and enable Parliament to efficiently process the significant volume of EU-related legislation ahead — this being especially relevant as the Moldovan Parliament prepares for the substantial task of adopting over 300 EU-related laws by the end of this year. At the same time, fair and balanced procedural rules safeguard political pluralism, encourage constructive dialogue, and ensure meaningful cooperation with the opposition.
The discussion was broad and substantive, bringing together political parties, civil society organisations, independent media representatives, and local government experts. Here are the key themes raised:
🔹 Floor-crossing (traseism) — participants called for stronger safeguards against deputies switching political affiliations after elections.
🔹 Language of work — Romanian was reaffirmed as the working language of Parliament. Concerns were raised about the quality and funding of Russian-language translation services.
🔹 Division of powers — clarity was requested on the roles of committees, factions, the plenary, and the Permanent Bureau, including how debate time is allocated.
🔹 Opposition rights — multiple voices stressed that authentic democracy requires a functioning opposition: the right to investigate, access information, present separate reports, and not have speaking time arbitrarily limited. An authentic democracy is when the opposition can work.
🔹 Relationship with local public administration (APL) — several articles were flagged as outdated or unclear, particularly those governing Parliament's oversight of local authorities. Article 171, which grants Parliament the right to dissolve local councils, was widely contested as violating the principle of local autonomy.
🔹 Civil society participation — concerns were raised about passive consultation mechanisms, lack of transparency, and the need to formally integrate the public participation law into the Rules of Procedure. Use of the particip.gov.md platform was encouraged.
🔹 Lobbying and advocacy — a dedicated framework is being developed, with references to ongoing work with international partners.
🔹The lack of clear timing regulation within parliamentary proceedings — including fixed voting hours, allocated speaking time, time for debates, questions, etc. The revised Rules of Procedure are expected to establish a formal framework to address these shortcomings.
🔹The Government Hour will be formally scheduled in the Rules of Procedure. The framing here is politically pointed — the implication being that by fixing a dedicated Government Hour in the Rules of Procedure, the majority aims to channel opposition scrutiny into a structured format and reduce the grounds or pressure for censure motions.
🔹 Parliamentary control and EU integration — the role of Parliament in Moldova's European integration path was highlighted as needing stronger and more explicit framing in the new code.
The consultation underlined broad consensus on one point: the Rules of Procedure must not serve the majority alone — they must guarantee space for opposition, civil society, and citizens to meaningfully participate in legislative life.
Parlamentul Republicii Moldova