15/05/2026
đą Shalom Convent Update â More Delays, More Questions
At this stage, the pattern is impossible to ignore.
Frostbreak appealed Kildare County Councilâs decision on the unauthorised fencing and gates at Shalom, which pushed the whole thing to An CoimisiĂșn PleanĂĄla.
A decision was due on 25th February 2026, but we were told it was delayed due to a âbacklog.â
Then the new date â 20th April 2026 â came with letters landing through many of our doors saying the case was now delayed again because of the âcomplexity of the case.â
And it doesnât stop there.
On 12th May, An CoimisiĂșn PleanĂĄla was also supposed to issue a determination on Case 324005, the Section 5 (ED1305) ruling on whether turning floors in Shalom Convent into an IPAS centre is exempt from planning permission.
That decision has now been pushed out too â all the way to 3rd July 2026, again citing backlog.
Three major delays.
Three moving deadlines.
Three decisions that directly affect our town, our planning system, and our right to transparency.
Meanwhile, next door, Fr. George didnât get the decision he wanted for his parish centre â yet local TD James lawless and councillor Paul Ward had no issue supporting it. The contrast is hard to ignore.
And now we have the principal of St. Cocaâs, Linda Daly, raising alarm about pupils âlosing the right of wayâ through the parish grounds â even though no such loss has occurred.
But where is that same level of concern for the impending IPAS centre right beside the school?
Instead, what we see is support for plans to tear down walls and the grotto to create whatâs being sold as a âsafer entranceâ â an entrance that would be 100 metres from a proposed IPAS centre.
At the same time, Frostbreak is offering land for her prefab classrooms, and appears aligned with both the school and the parish on their respective projects.
Itâs hard not to notice how these interests overlap.
Itâs hard not to notice who is helping whom.
And itâs very hard not to ignore how the community is being left out while others look after each other.
Kilcock deserves clarity, fairness, and transparency â not endless delays, selective concern, and behindâtheâscenes arrangements.
We will keep watching.
We will keep documenting.
And we will keep holding every decisionâmaker to account