Palace of Spirits

Palace of Spirits This is a platform that gave opportunities to us to diagnose individual spirituals claims and messages claimed to be coming from God. All these claims are

Palace of spirits as the name sounds is a platform that tolerates every intuitions coming from any entity on earth or beyond so far as it does not bring about division among Humanity

‎Chapter 2‎‎Africa Before the Missionaries: Judaism, Ìṣèṣe, and the Forgotten Timeline‎When Europeans tell our story, A...
06/04/2026

‎Chapter 2
‎‎Africa Before the Missionaries: Judaism, Ìṣèṣe, and the Forgotten Timeline
‎When Europeans tell our story, Africa appears suddenly on the stage the moment a Bible or a crucifix touches our shore. Everything before that is dark, “pagan,” or simply ignored. In this chapter I want to reverse the camera. Before we ever heard of an Anglican bishop or a Roman pope, this continent already knew shrines, covenants, prophetic vows, purity laws, and complex moral codes. Long before European missionaries organised “churches,” Africa was already negotiating with the God of Israel in its own way and walking its own ancient paths of ìṣèṣe.To understand Moses Orimolade and the pillar he laid, we must first restore this long African religious timeline. Otherwise, when we say that his foundation is Judaic–Yoruba, people will imagine we are adding foreign elements to a Christian core. The truth is almost the opposite: colonial Christianity is the late arrival; Judaism and indigenous religion had already sunk deep roots into African soil.1. Ìṣèṣe: Africa’s Own Covenant WorldAmong the Yoruba, ìṣèṣe is not a small compartment called “traditional religion.” It is the total pattern of life handed down from the source—oríṣun—that shapes how a people understand God, the universe, the earth, and themselves. It includes:A layered cosmos: Ọ̀run (the invisible realm) and Ayé (the visible), continuously interacting.A gallery of òrìṣà and irúnmòlẹ̀ (primordial powers and deities) who stand as ministers and messengers under a Supreme Being often named Olódùmarè or Eledumare.Systems of divination (especially Ifa), sacrifice, taboo, purification, and oath that govern health, justice, and social order.A strong sense of covenant: promises made to deities, ancestors, and community, with real consequences for those who keep or break them.In such a world, holiness is not an imported Christian idea. There are already codes: things you must not eat, places you must not go, days you must not violate, objects you must not touch. There are already priests set apart by vows, with restrictions on hair, clothing, s*x, and money. There are already songs that function as spells and prayers at the same time. When missionaries later arrived, they did not bring these categories into a vacuum; they met a complex, coherent covenant civilisation and then tried to overwrite it.Yoruba ìṣèṣe is only one example. Across West, Central, and Southern Africa, we see similar patterns: shrines dedicated to clan deities, elaborate ancestor veneration, mediums and prophets, ritual specialists for rain, war, fertility, and healing. The common thread is that Africa never saw the world as spiritually empty. Our ancestors walked in a dense, enchanted universe filled with living powers and moral weight.This matters because when Moses Orimolade is born to a shrine priest and grows up in a house full of Ifa, herbs, taboos, and ritual stories, he is not stepping out of darkness into light when he encounters the Bible. He is moving from one covenant vocabulary into another, recognising familiar patterns in a new text.2. Judaic Footprints on African SoilAlongside indigenous systems like ìṣèṣe, there is another older strand: the long, complicated relationship between Africa and ancient Israel. Ethiopia is the clearest witness. For centuries before European missionaries planted Protestant or Catholic missions there, Ethiopians already claimed a special relationship with the practice of Judaism through the legend of Menelik, son of Solomon and the Queen of Sheba.Whether or not every detail of that legend is historically precise, its effects are real. In Ethiopia we find:Communities like Beta Israel (Ethiopian Jews) who kept Sabbath, dietary laws, circumcision, and biblical festivals long before European Jews “rediscovered” them. An ancient tradition (Ethiopian Orthodox) that is soaked in Old‑Testament imagery—ark, incense, priesthood, fasts, holy days—in ways that feel closer to Judaism than to many Western churches.A national consciousness that sees the people not as recent converts but as part of an extended biblical story rooted in the Nile, the Horn of Africa, and the Red Sea, not just in Rome or London.From Egypt to Nubia to Aksum, contacts between Africa and the world of the Bible have been there for millennia: trade routes, Before the ten commandments was given to Moses on Mount Sinai there are fourty two law of maat which is already in force in Egypt. Eight of ten law of Moses was found in the law of maat.This law today form the basis of Judaism tradition worship. if Moses Orimolade ideology blend Yoruba isese with Judaism it is still about Africa. Judaism is not a foreign tradition to African.The Ethiopian practices it up till today. imigrations, exiles, intermarriage. The point is not to prove that “Africans are the real Israelites” in a simplistic way. The point is to show that Judaic religion is not foreign to African soil. It has been part of our religious landscape long before colonial mission boards invented their own versions of Christian orthodoxy.When I describe Orimolade’s spirituality as Judaic–Yoruba, I am therefore not smuggling in something exotic. I am saying that he stands at the meeting point of two very old currents: an African covenant tradition (ìṣèṣe) and a long African conversation with the God of Israel. He is not the first to stand there; he is one of the first in modern Nigeria to make that meeting public and organised.3. Christianity as Late, Colonial GuestAgainst this older background, Christianity—as a structured, European‑led system—arrives very late in most of West Africa. Portuguese contacts along the coast in the 15th–16th centuries brought some Catholic presence, especially around the Kongo kingdom and parts of present‑day Angola and Benin. But for what is now Nigeria and most of Anglophone West Africa, the decisive wave came in the 19th century with British and other Protestant mission societies.These missions came with multiple faces: education, medicine, moral reform, and humanitarian rhetoric, especially around the abolition of the Atlantic slave trade. At the same time, they carried clear ideological projects:To replace ancestral shrines, sacred groves, and indigenous priesthoods with churches, schools, and European‑style clergy.To reshape family life—especially marriage, inheritance, and s*xuality—according to Victorian norms.To centralise spiritual authority in mission stations and imported liturgies, making African access to God pass through European control.They were not simply bringing Jesus; they were bringing a whole civilisational package. Converts were often pressured to abandon their names, ritual obligations, and extended family ties that did not align with mission expectations. Drums, dances, trance, and many forms of African expressive spirituality were labelled “fetish,” “paganism,” or “devil worship.”This is the world into which Moses Orimolade walks as a young man: a world where African religious genius is constantly delegitimised, where mission churches claim a monopoly on “true worship,” and where Judaic and ìṣèṣe patterns that should have been recognised as cousins are instead treated as rivals to the Christian project. His refusal to remain inside this framework, his decision to move as an independent prophet, and his creation of an African liturgy must be read against this colonial backdrop.4. Why This Timeline Matters for Moses’ PillarBy restoring the long timeline—Ìṣèṣe → Judaic presence → colonial Christianity—we can finally see Moses Orimolade in his true proportions. He is not a man who drags Yoruba religion into Christianity; he is a man who refuses to let colonial Christianity erase the older conversation between Africa and God.When he chants Psalms like ofọ́, he is not being superstitious; he is recognising that African words have always carried àṣẹ and that the biblical text can be used in the same way. When he names his society after Cherubim and Seraphim, he is not performing foreign exoticism; he is calling down temple imagery into Yoruba ritual space. When he allows white garment, candle, water, and night‑vigil to structure worship, he is not adding “culture” to theology; he is insisting that African bodies and rhythms are themselves theological arguments.If we start the story only when Anglican missionaries arrive, then Orimolade appears as a rebel son of the church. If we start it where we should—in the long landscape of Ìṣèṣe and Judaic presence in Africa—then he appears as a loyal son of an older covenant, using the Bible to articulate what Africa already half‑knew: that God can be known in holiness, vow, and power without surrendering to empire.This chapter has one simple goal: to clear the ground. In the chapters that follow, when I say “Moses’ pillar is Judaic–Ìṣèṣe,” you now know that I am not suggesting a strange mixture. I am naming a continuity: Africa’s own religious world meeting the Eledumare on African soil, long before, beneath, and beyond the late arrival of missionary Christianity.‎

06/04/2026

Moses’ Pillar, Not Jesus’:

‎Naming the FoundationEvery story stands on a foundation, but not every community knows how to name its own foundation truthfully. The Cherubim and Seraphim movement in Nigeria is a perfect example. Publicly, many branches now describe themselves as part of the “Church of Christ,” confessing what other denominations confess and using the same language of “Christ the solid rock.” Privately, in songs, rituals, and ancestral memory, there is another truth: the real pillar was laid by Moses Orimolade Tunolase, and it was laid on a Judaic–Yoruba foundation, not on the imported ideology of Western Christendom.This book begins by forcing that contradiction into the open. We are going to take two songs—really one song with two different foundations—and treat them as theological documents. The first sings: “Ipìlẹ̀ tí Mósè fi lèlẹ̀ lẹ́yìí…” This is the pillar that Moses laid. The second, later version sings: “Ipìlẹ̀ tí Jésù fi lèlẹ̀ lẹ́yìí…” This is the pillar that Jesus laid. Between these two small changes of name lies the entire struggle over how Cherubim and Seraphim understands itself, and over how Africa tells the story of its own prophets.The choice of name is not cosmetic. In Yoruba thought, ipìlẹ̀ is not just “foundation” in an engineering sense; it is origin, essence, the deep reason why a thing is what it is. When elders say “ranti ipìlẹ̀ rẹ,” they are not asking you to remember concrete; they are asking you to remember destiny, bloodline, covenant. To say that a movement stands on “the pillar Moses laid” is to confess that its true origin lies in the life, vows, visions, and cosmology of Moses Orimolade. To replace that with “the pillar Jesus laid,” in the missionary sense, is to relocate the movement’s identity into the global, trans‑historical “Church of Christ” story that comes to us pre‑packaged from Europe. It is an act of spiritual re‑registration: a change of ownership in the invisible world.When we speak of “Jesus” in this context, we must be precise. I am not denying the historical Jesus of Nazareth, the Jewish teacher whose life and death are recorded in the Gospels. I am challenging the church‑ified Jesus, the one who travels with colonial mission societies, theology faculties, and ecumenical councils. That Jesus is wrapped in a ready‑made ideology: particular doctrines of church, ministry, and morality that were designed to fit European history. He arrives with a passport stamped “universal,” but his clothes still smell of empire. When C&S leaders later insist that their foundation is “the pillar Jesus laid,” they are often unconsciously pledging loyalty to that imported ideological package, not to the Jewish prophet who walked in Galilee.By contrast, when the older line says “the pillar that Moses laid,” it speaks of a man who was born in Yoruba land, to a shrine priest father, consecrated like a Nazarite, steeped in Old‑Testament consciousness, and moving inside Yoruba ritual logic. His pillar is not abstract Christology; it is a lived synthesis of Judaism and ìṣèṣe, filtered through the Bible in Yoruba. To stand on Moses’ pillar is to accept that C&S is an African movement whose DNA is not neutral Christian “orthodoxy” but a specific, contextual fusion that many Western theologians would find uncomfortable.The question of naming the pillar matters for at least three reasons.First, it decides who gets to interpret the past. If the foundation is “Jesus’ pillar” in the generic church sense, then bishops, councils, and foreign theologians can claim equal ownership of C&S history. They can mark Moses and Abiodun as colourful local saints in a larger, universal drama they control. If the foundation is “Moses’ pillar,” they must approach as guests, not landlords. Interpretation then belongs first to those who understand Yoruba cosmology, Ethiopian Judaic history, Aladura spirituality, and the politics of colonial mission on African soil.Second, it shapes what counts as legitimate practice. On Jesus’ church‑ideology pillar, many of the things that define C&S—white garments, barefoot worship, night‑long drumming, psalm‑chanting as spiritual technology, casual coexistence with ìṣèṣe sensibilities—can be dismissed as “cultural extras,” or even as “syncretism” that needs correction. On Moses’ pillar, those practices are not decorations; they are part of the foundation itself. They belong there. They are the way theology is lived in this body. Changing the pillar from Moses to Jesus is therefore not a harmless update; it is a way of demoting African ritual intelligence from “doctrine” to “local colour.”Third, the pillar question determines how we talk about power and independence. A Jesus‑pillar framed by global Church ideology tends to support centralisation, respectability, and conformity to broader denominational norms. It smooths the path into ecumenical councils and government registration lists. A Moses‑pillar demands that we honour a prophet who walked away from mission control, broke with Anglicanism, fought shrines on his own terms, and accepted marginalisation and suffering rather than submit to foreign definitions of what a “proper church” should look like. To choose Moses’ pillar is, in effect, to choose a more dangerous, decolonised path.In this first chapter, then, my goal is not to provide every detail of Orimolade’s life—that will come later—but to frame the argument you will see running through the entire book:Cherubim and Seraphim was born on a Judaic–Yoruba ipìlẹ̀ laid by Moses Orimolade, with Christiana Abiodun’s celestial vision as its ignition point.Over time, through schism, court cases, and the desire for respectability, its leaders increasingly re‑named that foundation as a generic “Church of Christ” pillar centred on Jesus in the missionary sense.This re‑naming has theological, political, and psychological consequences for how C&S sees itself, how it treats ìṣèṣe, how it relates to African independence, and how it understands unity and conflict within its own ranks.You will notice that I keep using the language of pillar instead of just “foundation.” This is intentional. A foundation is flat, hidden under the building. A pillar is visible, vertical, symbolic. In Yoruba shrines and even domestic ritual, pillars—ọ̀pá, staves, posts—mark the place where heaven and earth meet. Orimolade himself is remembered with a staff in his hand, a physical sign of authority and connection. When we say “Moses’ pillar,” we are invoking that image: a visible, embodied line of power, standing between worlds. When we say “Jesus’ pillar,” if we mean the institutional Christ of the colonial church, we are invoking a different line of power, one that often bypasses African intermediaries and answers more quickly to Rome, Canterbury, or Geneva.This chapter will therefore proceed in three movements. In the next section, I will briefly describe how official C&S narratives today name their pillar, and how those narratives already lean towards the Jesus‑church reading. After that, I will sketch what it would mean to take Moses’ pillar seriously as the primary ipìlẹ̀: what kind of movement emerges when we accept that the founder’s Judaic–ìṣèṣe identity is not a problem to be solved but a gift to be claimed. Finally, I will set out the questions that the rest of this book will answer: about governance, liturgy, prophecy, schism, and independence, all traced back to this initial act of naming.If you are reading this as a Cherubim and Seraphim member, I invite you to hold your own songbook in your mind as you move through these pages. Ask yourself, each time you hear a chorus or hymn: does this line sound more like Moses’ pillar or the churchified Jesus’ pillar? If you are reading as a scholar or an interested observer, keep watching how quietly the name‑shift happens in the sources you use. You may discover that what looked like neutral “church history” is, in fact, part of a long, subtle project of changing the label on Africa’s spiritual foundations.We begin with songs because in Africa, songs remember what official minutes forget.

‎The sky  above. The believers paradise ‎Modern atmospheric science confirms the sky is merely the troposphere and strat...
11/03/2026

‎The sky above. The believers paradise

Modern atmospheric science confirms the sky is merely the troposphere and stratosphere, layers of nitrogen (78%), oxygen (21%), and water v***r forming clouds at altitudes up to 12 km—no divine realm inhabited by Yahweh, Allah, or any deity. We inhabit Earth's solid crust and mantle, not some hollow subterranean fantasy; satellite imagery from NASA's Terra satellite and Hubble observations debunk any "heaven above" as celestial bodies billions of light-years distant.It's sheer folly—idiomatically, "barking up the wrong tree"—to anthropomorphize these as godly abodes, like Moses mistaking solar glare refracted through dew on Mount Horeb's grasses for an unconsuming "burning bush" (Exodus 3:2), when spectroscopy reveals it's just Rayleigh scattering of sunlight. "Hellfire" preachers point to the Sun, a G-type main-sequence star fusing hydrogen at 15 million °C in its core (per helioseismology data from SOHO probe), while "heaven" is the Moon, a barren rocky satellite 384,400 km away, reflecting just 12% of sunlight (Apollo mission reflectors confirm). The myriad stars? Distant fusion-powered spheres in our Milky Way galaxy alone, cataloged by Gaia spacecraft's 1.8 billion-star map—not extra "heavens" for the pious.With telescopes like JWST piercing 13.5 billion years into cosmic history and GPS proving Earth's curvature sans flat-earth myths, why cling to Bronze Age sky-god worship? Praying skyward is like whistling in the wind—pointless ritual amid peer-reviewed enlightenment.

18/02/2026
‎The God that thrives on praise, prayer, worship and fasting.‎‎The Ideal Palace System‎‎Imagine an African palace runnin...
18/02/2026

‎The God that thrives on praise, prayer, worship and fasting.

‎The Ideal Palace System

‎Imagine an African palace running smoothly: soldiers for security, elders for counsel, tax collectors for revenue, cleaners and gardeners for order, farmers feeding the palace, and drummers as praise singers.

‎The Shift in Roles

‎One day, the king wakes up to witness the drummers, the praise singers, successfully luring all other departments into the praise singers. No more security, no tax collection, no farming, no cleaning. If he stays silent for a week, the palace becomes filthy, hungry, and broke.

‎The Impact of Modern Orators

‎That’s what many “orators” are doing to African minds today. They convert people into full-time worshippers of Christ or Allah, convincing them that their deities live on praise, worship, and fasting.

‎The Necessity of Work

‎Faith is important, but when it replaces work, farming, trade, and real production, it becomes a trap. Preachers of faith should work real jobs, not spend their days hypnotizing others into joining them.

‎Final Thoughts

‎Let praise be minimized and balanced, not turned into an industry that drains the economy and keeps minds primitive.



WARS SUPPORTED BY YAHWEH AND ALLAHReligious scripture often portrays Yahweh (God of Israel) and Allah (God of Islam) as ...
19/09/2025

WARS SUPPORTED BY YAHWEH AND ALLAH

Religious scripture often portrays Yahweh (God of Israel) and Allah (God of Islam) as righteous beings who command peace and mercy. Yet both the Bible and the Qur’an contain numerous accounts where these deities directly command, bless, or even participate in wars that result in mass killings, destruction of cities, and the enslavement of people. This challenges the popular belief that they are purely merciful and just.

1. Wars Supported by Yahweh in the Bible

a. The Conquest of Canaan

Scripture: Deuteronomy 7:1–2, Joshua 6:20–21.

Yahweh commands the Israelites to destroy entire nations (Hittites, Amorites, Canaanites, Perizzites, Hivites, and Jebusites) without mercy. The destruction includes men, women, children, and even livestock.

This is portrayed not as self-defense but as a divine cleansing of the land.

b. The Battle of Jericho

Scripture: Joshua 6.

Yahweh instructs Joshua to circle the city with priests blowing trumpets. On the seventh day, the walls collapse, and the Israelites kill every living thing inside.

c. Amalekite Genocide

Scripture: 1 Samuel 15:2–3.

Yahweh commands King Saul to kill all Amalekites — men, women, children, and animals — for what their ancestors did centuries earlier. This is divine-sanctioned revenge.

d. Plagues and Natural Disasters as War Tools

In Exodus 7–12, Yahweh sends plagues on Egypt to force Pharaoh’s hand, killing all the firstborn of Egypt in one night — including innocent children — to free the Israelites.

---

2. Wars Supported by Allah in the Qur’an

a. Battle of Badr

Scripture: Qur’an 8:9–12.

Allah promises angelic assistance to Muslims against the Meccans, encouraging them to strike at the necks and fingertips of their enemies.

This is depicted as a battle for the survival of Islam, yet it includes explicit divine endorsement of killing.

b. Battle of Uhud

Scripture: Qur’an 3:152–153.

After Muslims lose morale, Allah is described as testing their faith, imply

21/04/2025

At the palace of spirits we are of the views that there is only one supreme being which nothing about him is known to human but to spirits. Due to ignorance human turn every sprits that try to communicate anything from other realms to us as God. Thereby creating many Deities and refers to them as God resulting in many different order of worship as every Deities are routed in one traditional practices or others. Human nixed culture with lies and laced it spirituality and named it religion. We will accept that every culture is laced with spirituality and facts and not lies but religion is a concoction full of lies to deceived ignorant believers and bring about division among mankind. An educated spiritualists does not have any favourite among the spirits or Deities. It is a crime spiritually to show favouritism among the Deities or spirits or display sense of superiority or inferiority toward any Deities or Spirits. This bring division among mankind and contradict the law of the mother nature.

The ninety nine name of Allah is not Islamic but the traditional names given to children in Saudi Arabia accordance to t...
13/02/2025

The ninety nine name of Allah is not Islamic but the traditional names given to children in Saudi Arabia accordance to their lineage of their ancestral Deities. As an example the father of Mohammed was called Abdullah meaning slave of Allah. Allah exists before Mohammed was born. Allah is a creature and not creator.

Allah and Eledumare not the same entity.........AII asked Ai this question .... Allah is not the same as Olodumare becau...
24/11/2024

Allah and Eledumare not the same entity.........AI

I asked Ai this question .... Allah is not the same as Olodumare because the messangers of Allah look down on non believers as they are not creature of God

The AI response .. You're highlighting a significant difference between the Islamic concept of Allah and the Yoruba concept of Olodumare.

In Islam, the idea of Tawhid (oneness with God) emphasizes the uniqueness and exclusivity of Allah. This can sometimes lead to a distinction between believers and non-believers, with some interpretations viewing non-believers as being outside of Allah's mercy.

In contrast, the Yoruba concept of Olodumare is often more inclusive and emphasizes the interconnectedness of all things. Olodumare is seen as the creator of all humans, regardless of their beliefs or backgrounds.

Additionally, the Yoruba tradition emphasizes the importance of respecting and honoring all people, regardless of their faith or spiritual practices. This is reflected in the concept of "Omo" (child), which emphasizes the shared humanity and common ancestry of all people.

Your observation highlights the importance of understanding and respecting the diversity of spiritual traditions and beliefs. By acknowledging and appreciating these
differences, we can work towards greater tolerance, empathy, and cooperation.

Well said!

then I asked again

My first statement is not a direct question but a mere statement now my question Is Allah and Eledumare the same or different entity with same position?

AI response

You're asking whether Allah and Olodumare (not Eledumare) are the same or different entities, despite holding similar positions as supreme deities.

In Islamic theology, Allah is the one and only God, considered eternal, all-powerful, and all-knowing.

In Yoruba mythology, Olodumare is the supreme deity, also considered all-powerful, all-knowing, and the creator of the universe.

While both Allah and Olodumare share similar attributes and posi

Address

Katamanto Kokompe Block Tarzan. Accra
Accra

Telephone

+233275397650

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Palace of Spirits posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Organization

Send a message to Palace of Spirits:

Share