02/09/2026
π¨ ππππππ πππ
πππ ππ πππ ππππππ? β ππππππ ππππππ πππ ππππππ ππ π ππππππππππ
Tom Baileyβs resignation from the Labour Party should not be allowed to distract from the serious questions surrounding his own position as a Tynemouth councillor.
Bailey has quit Labour while already suspended by his own party and before its disciplinary process had concluded.
It is difficult to escape the impression that he has jumped before he was pushed.
In recent weeks he has been at the centre of controversy over the extraordinary βarmed patrolsβ WhatsApp post, was the subject of a police inquiry and has faced multiple complaints under the councillorsβ standards process.
While the police matter did not result in criminal action, that is not the same question as whether his judgement and conduct meet the standards residents should expect from someone holding elected public office.
At least three standards complaints concerning Cllr Bailey also remain active.
Yet rather than address those issues, his resignation statement attacks other politicians as βincompetent, unaccountableβ and βabsentβ.
There is a considerable irony in lecturing others about accountability while walking away from the political party under whose banner you were elected.
Leaving Labour does not wipe the slate clean.
Tynemouth residents elected Tom Bailey as a Labour councillor. He has now abandoned that party following his suspension and amid serious ongoing questions about his conduct.
If he genuinely believes in accountability, there is now one straightforward course of action:
Resign from North Tyneside Council, trigger a by-election and allow the people of Tynemouth to decide whether they still want him representing them.
After a police inquiry, suspension by his own party and multiple standards complaints, we do not believe Tom Bailey is suitable to continue representing Tynemouth residents.
He has resigned from Labour. Now he should do the decent thing and resign as a councillor too.