10/08/2024
After a long hiatus, the developer has filed the final application for development at Ashdown. The deadline for comments is now less than a week away; i.e. Ashdown needs you to send an email to Wealden District Council with your views by *23.59 this Friday 16 August*. More on how, what and why below.
Skip/scroll to the âHow to helpâ section below, at the bottom of this post, if youâre in a hurry, or see our website https://www.latrobeheritage.org.uk/save-ashdown . Otherwise, read on.
The Latrobe Heritage Trust remains gravely concerned that these plans would cause severe and irreparable damage to a building and site of international significance.
This remarkable building, a place of refinement, beauty and innovation, and a prototype for the US Capitol, has for the last four years been failed by its owner and failed by the state. Now is the time to do your bit to prevent plans which would destroy much of its historic fabric, and to saturate its historic landscape in low-quality, suburban housing.
The original plans, filed in December 2022, were widely condemned, including by Historic England, us, SAVE Britain's Heritage, the Georgian Group and hundreds of local people, including many of you.
The developer went away to lick their wounds, and commissioned some more paperwork. A few weeks ago, the updated plans were uploaded onto Wealdenâs website.
In truth, very little has changed in this slightly updated application. So hereâs a summary of what has changed:
Three victories for Ashdown (thanks in no small part to your lobbying last time round). The developer has backed down on their proposal for a 16ft-wide lift-shaft on the side of Latrobeâs Georgian villa. They have given up on trying to demolish part of the rear (Georgian/late Tudor) wall of the house. They've also given up on chopping the main house into two apartments âverticallyâ, i.e. the top floor stays with the two below.
However, these plans still entail a hugely damaging scheme of works to the houseâs interior, described by Prof. Patrick Snadon as the âbest-preserved Latrobe interior in the worldâ. More below.
Having been told by Historic England, us and you that their proposed development around the house was unacceptably âsuburbanâ (HEâs word), the developer has redesigned the surrounding development to add one more house, further densifying the north of the site. The proposed configuration is now larger, and still clearly âsuburbanâ. See images below.
The proposed new buildings would be made from low quality materials which are entirely alien to the setting of the Latrobe building, and are not historically or geographically appropriate. These include composite cladding and dark brick, with a misplaced attempt at very modest decoration by placing some of the bricks beneath the windows at obverse angles. This change merely adds a further house to a group of dwellings which are egregiously out of keeping with either of Sussex vernacular architecture, the principles of the Greek Revival, or broader neoclassicism.
The updated papers talk about every aspect of the structure of the Latrobe house needing to be rated to 60 minutesâ fire resistance, but they donât say how this would be achieved â an extraordinary oversight for a building of this historic significance. Indeed, the level of detail in the updated plans is so wanting as to make it difficult for the Latrobe Heritage Trust, or expert statutory consultees, including Historic England, to make a proper assessment.
So this change merely adds a further house to a group of dwellings which are egregiously out of keeping with either of Sussex vernacular architecture, the principles of the Greek Revival, or broader neoclassicism. Frankly, itâs extraordinary that the developer could think terraced, obviously suburban housing is appropriate to this setting. The proposed development around the house is now even more enormous, and remains entirely incongruous.
The developer also proposes to move around some bin and bike stores, and to move the car park â needed for the 110+ cars which would be used by residents to come and go â further away from their houses.
Thatâs it. Everything else remains the same.
So the main Grade II* building, which comprises the Latrobe villa and the original Tudor house, is still to be split â just into eight flats rather than nine.
To this end, the developer continues to propose a profoundly destructive scheme of demolition and construction works to divide the house, which will result inevitably in a substantial loss of historic fabric.
Historic buildings become very difficult to maintain when split into separate ownerships. While also gravely lacking in detail, even the developerâs own updated heritage impact statement admits that the proposals âstill result in some negative effects on the historic significanceâ of the house.
This is a truly extraordinary admission.
There is also no change to the plan for the destruction of the interior of Ashdownâs Chapel, built in the Arts and Crafts style by Norman Evill in c.1930 as a war memorial to the fallen of the First and Second World Wars, for conversion into a flat.
The plans on flood risk and transport remain so insufficient as to have been criticised by the various councils. Nothing else has changed: this is still, ultimately, a proposal to carve up one of the finest houses in the country and a prototype for the US Capitol, to saturate it with suburban housing, and to provide the access for this development up a mile-long single-track bridleway.
In summary, and on the basis of continued professional advice, the Trust continues to consider that the proposals breach or fail to meet the requirements of 41 local and national planning policies, and that there are several technical flaws within the applications.
You can read our original January 2023 objection which sets this out in more detail on our website; with the exceptions of the changes above, which have not resulted in any changes to the breaches of policy, it stands. We will be submitting a formal response in line with the above in the coming days.
So whatâs the alternative? Itâs straightforward, itâs far more viable than this proposal and it could be brought into commission within months rather than years.
The buildings and facilities remain configured for a wide variety of educational and institutional uses. The expenditure they require for continued use as such is very limited as compared to the cost of demolition and housing development, which the application estimates to create 3,573 tonnes of landfill waste. The exorbitant cost of these works is the principal reason why these proposals are so excessive.
Retaining mixed residential and institutional/educational use would have minimal impact on the heritage of the site while continuing to provide (i) utility to the community and (ii) a level of public access and appreciation for the heritage at Ashdown. Even at the peak of Covid, the developer s understood only narrowly to have outbid a child carerâs respite charity. The market is now far more buoyant; there is no evidence that continued educational or institutional use is unviable. You can read more on the viable alternative for Ashdown on our website.
HOW TO HELP
Send an email by 23.59 on Friday 16 August to [email protected], subject line WD/2022/2372/MAJ and WD/2022/2373/LB , setting out your views. You can read the planning application here; listed building consent application here. You can visit the Save Ashdown campaign hub https://www.latrobeheritage.org.uk/save-ashdown . And you can read our original January 2023 objection which sets this out in more detail here.
SHARE this post, and follow us on Facebook and Instagram.
Sign up to the mailing list if you havenât already https://mailchi.mp/bbca707d46b1/save-ashdown . Weâre firing up the engine of the campaign again, so youâll see a number of posts in the coming week. To get the word out to as many people as possible, weâll also be sponsoring the post to people locally - 500,000 people saw our digital campaign in January 2023.
Donate to the campaign https://wonderful.org/pay?ref=327409 . Weâre a very small charity with limited resources, and weâre extremely grateful for the generous support weâve received so far. Donations have so far printed 200 posters and paid for sponsored ads online; weâre also keeping funds back in case we have to challenge a planning decision in a judicial review in due course.
Sir Roger Scruton was right when he observed that âbeauty is vanishing from our world because we live as though it did not matter.â
Thank you for your support in living as though it does.
Note: the plans and CGI images used in this post are copyrighted materials belonging to Den Architecture Ltd. They are used here solely for the purpose of criticism and review under the fair dealing provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Š 2024 Den Architecture Ltd. All rights reserved.