Chan Abraham - Changing Britain For Good

25/08/2026

𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑴𝒆𝒕 𝑷𝒐𝒍𝒊𝒄𝒆, 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑰𝑪𝑶, 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑭𝑶𝑰𝑨 𝑹𝒆𝒒𝒖𝒆𝒔𝒕 𝑻𝒉𝒆𝒚 𝑺𝒕𝒊𝒍𝒍 𝑾𝒐𝒏'𝒕 𝑨𝒏𝒔𝒘𝒆𝒓 𝑷𝒓𝒐𝒑𝒆𝒓𝒍𝒚: 𝑾𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒆 𝑻𝒉𝒊𝒏𝒈𝒔 𝑺𝒕𝒂𝒏𝒅
Update: the Met Police has now completed its internal review of my Freedom of Information request — and still won’t release (or even properly consider releasing in redacted form) the legal advice behind its decision not to investigate Sadiq Khan’s defence of the “From the river to the sea” chant.

Five months after I complained to the Information Commissioner’s Office, they still haven’t issued a decision. I’ve reminded them, in writing, of their clear legal duty under the FOIA.

The IOPC declined to use its power of initiative. MOPAC has refused to recuse itself and says its review could take up to eight months.

Every official route is moving slowly.

The full picture — including the latest correspondence — is in my new blog post:

https://www.chanabraham-changingbritainforgood.com/post/the-met-police-the-ico-and-the-foia-request-they-still-won-t-answer-properly-where-things-stand

If you believe public bodies should answer FOI requests properly and on time, please share this.

Accountability matters.

Reform UK

Where We Are and Why It MattersThis is an update on my Freedom of Information Act request to the Metropolitan Police Service for the legal advice behind its decision not to investigate the Mayor of London's remarks defending the chant “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free.” Since my...

23/07/2026

𝑪𝒉𝒓𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒂𝒏𝒔 𝒊𝒏 𝑩𝒓𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒊𝒏: 𝑨𝒘𝒂𝒌𝒆!
Christians in Britain - from the 1960s onward - have drifted far from what our Master requires. Over these sixty years enjoyed a measure of good things, a degree of “renewal” yet, with a few exceptions, church attendees have not been the “salt” and or maintained “the Light” in constitutionally and culturally Christian Britain.

From a raft of “permissive legislation” from 1967 that radically forced cultural change, that no one was consulted on, to Britain’s mass identity crisis in 2026, Our Nation, that should now be flourishing and a beacon of Christ’s Hope to The Nations, is mired in confusion, anxiety, fear and hopelessness.

While the moral rot has been taking place within, the enemies of freedom, democracy, peace and justice have grown stronger, whether resident or incoming.

Yet many professing-to-be-Christians remain asleep, comatose, willingly ignorant of the real and present danger in our streets, for our children and women and Britain’s future. Their minds and worldview drenched in the fakery of mainstream media, they fail to understand how much they have allowed the world to press them into its mould.

What more evidence of the perilous times we now live in is required before you awake and heed the call of The Spirit?

Please feel free to comment and get this urgent discussion moving.

13/07/2026

𝑻𝒓𝒐𝒖𝒃𝒍𝒆𝒅 𝒕𝒊𝒎𝒆𝒔 𝒊𝒏 𝑩𝒓𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒊𝒏 𝒂𝒔 𝒍𝒆𝒂𝒅𝒆𝒓𝒔 𝒐𝒇 𝒐𝒖𝒓 𝒏𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒕𝒊𝒏𝒖𝒆 𝒕𝒐 𝒔𝒉𝒐𝒘 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒕𝒆𝒎𝒑𝒕 𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝒕𝒉𝒐𝒔𝒆 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒚 𝒆𝒙𝒊𝒔𝒕 𝒔𝒐𝒍𝒆𝒍𝒚 𝒕𝒐 𝒔𝒆𝒓𝒗𝒆, 𝒚𝒆𝒕 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒆 𝒊𝒔 𝑯𝒐𝒑𝒆

Whether they have gained their position by accident of birth, or a disillusioned and apathetic electorate, and though propped up by media bias, they will be held to account for depriving The People they should be serving of security, safety and prosperity in their homeland.

30/06/2026

𝑺𝒐𝒄𝒊𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒔𝒕 𝑪𝒊𝒕𝒊𝒛𝒆𝒏𝒔 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝑺𝒐𝒄𝒊𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒔𝒕 𝑳𝒆𝒂𝒅𝒆𝒓𝒔
As Blair #2 prepares to exit, and Blair #3 approaches the stage for an even briefer under-performance, their determined efforts grow to bring Britain’s People further into deprivation of the basic necessities for flourishing and freedom itself.

𝑌𝑒𝑡 2026 𝑖𝑠 𝐴 𝑌𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝐸𝑥𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑒, 𝑅𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔, 𝐵𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑘𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑂𝑢𝑡 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑁𝑒𝑤 𝐻𝑜𝑝𝑒.

The Light is breaking through; the darkness cannot extinguish it.

Credit Graphic: Brivael Le Pogan

15/06/2026

𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑴𝒂𝒚𝒐𝒓, 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑴𝒆𝒕, 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑳𝒂𝒘 𝑻𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝑶𝒏𝒍𝒚 𝑨𝒑𝒑𝒍𝒊𝒆𝒔 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒎𝒆: 𝑵𝒐 𝒐𝒏𝒆 — 𝒉𝒐𝒘𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒓 𝒑𝒐𝒘𝒆𝒓𝒇𝒖𝒍, 𝒉𝒐𝒘𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒓 𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒎𝒊𝒏𝒆𝒏𝒕, 𝒉𝒐𝒘𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒓 𝒑𝒐𝒍𝒊𝒕𝒊𝒄𝒂𝒍𝒍𝒚 𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒕𝒆𝒄𝒕𝒆𝒅 — 𝒔𝒉𝒐𝒖𝒍𝒅 𝒃𝒆 𝒂𝒃𝒐𝒗𝒆 𝑶𝒖𝒓 𝑳𝒂𝒘 𝒊𝒏 𝑩𝒓𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒊𝒏

The Metropolitan Police have issued their formal decision on my complaint about Sadiq Khan's defence of the "From the river to the sea" chant. They say everything was "acceptable."
It was not acceptable.

Here is what is established on the public record:

✦ The Met Police’s own Freedom of Information response confirmed that the officer who decided not to investigate Sadiq Khan relied on legal advice from 2023 — two years out of date, drafted before the most horrific wave of antisemitic violence this country has seen in living memory.

✦ The Met Police recorded a formal Non-Crime Hate Incident acknowledging a hate element in Khan’s remarks — and then declined to investigate. They recorded it. And still did nothing.

✦ The Mayor of London is, by statute, the Police and Crime Commissioner for the Metropolitan Police. The Met Police was asked to investigate its own Commissioner. The review of that failure has been directed to the Mayor's own office. 𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑴𝒂𝒚𝒐𝒓'𝒔 𝒐𝒇𝒇𝒊𝒄𝒆 𝒓𝒆𝒗𝒊𝒆𝒘𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒂 𝒄𝒐𝒎𝒑𝒍𝒂𝒊𝒏𝒕 𝒂𝒃𝒐𝒖𝒕 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑴𝒂𝒚𝒐𝒓. 𝑻𝒉𝒊𝒔 𝒊𝒔 𝒏𝒐𝒕 𝒂𝒄𝒄𝒆𝒑𝒕𝒂𝒃𝒍𝒆 𝒊𝒏 𝒂 𝒅𝒆𝒎𝒐𝒄𝒓𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒄 𝒄𝒐𝒖𝒏𝒕𝒓𝒚 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝒄𝒍𝒂𝒊𝒎𝒔 𝒕𝒐 𝒃𝒆 𝒈𝒐𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒏𝒆𝒅 𝒃𝒚 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒓𝒖𝒍𝒆 𝒐𝒇 𝒍𝒂𝒘.

✦ Lucy Connolly went to prison for 31 months for a tweet she deleted within hours. Jordan Parlour got 20 months for Facebook posts. Christian street preachers have been arrested on anonymous complaints. 𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑴𝒂𝒚𝒐𝒓 𝒐𝒇 𝑳𝒐𝒏𝒅𝒐𝒏 𝒈𝒂𝒗𝒆 𝒂 𝒏𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒂𝒍𝒍𝒚 𝒃𝒓𝒐𝒂𝒅𝒄𝒂𝒔𝒕 𝒕𝒆𝒍𝒆𝒗𝒊𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝒊𝒏𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒗𝒊𝒆𝒘 𝒅𝒆𝒇𝒆𝒏𝒅𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒂 𝒈𝒆𝒏𝒐𝒄𝒊𝒅𝒂𝒍 𝒄𝒉𝒂𝒏𝒕 𝒓𝒐𝒐𝒕𝒆𝒅 𝒊𝒏 𝑯𝒂𝒎𝒂𝒔'𝒔 𝒇𝒐𝒖𝒏𝒅𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒄𝒉𝒂𝒓𝒕𝒆𝒓. 𝑵𝒐𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒉𝒂𝒑𝒑𝒆𝒏𝒆𝒅.

I have now formally challenged all of this — simultaneously writing to the Met Police, to MOPAC (the Mayor's office, under protest at their jurisdiction), and to the Director General of the Independent Office for Police Conduct, Rachel Watson, formally inviting the IOPC to open an independent investigation under its statutory power of initiative.

The deadline for my review application is 1 July 2026. The clock is running.

𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝒓𝒖𝒍𝒆 𝒐𝒇 𝒍𝒂𝒘 𝒎𝒆𝒂𝒏𝒔 𝒏𝒐𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒊𝒇 𝒊𝒕 𝒐𝒏𝒍𝒚 𝒂𝒑𝒑𝒍𝒊𝒆𝒔 𝒕𝒐 𝒔𝒐𝒎𝒆.

𝑺𝒂𝒅𝒊𝒒 𝑲𝒉𝒂𝒏 𝒊𝒔 𝒏𝒐𝒕 𝒂𝒃𝒐𝒗𝒆 𝑶𝒖𝒓 𝑳𝒂𝒘 𝒊𝒏 𝑩𝒓𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒊𝒏

Full articles on my website: www.chanabraham-changingbritainforgood.com

The Met Police, Sadiq Khan, and the Law That only Applies to Some – The Next Steps
https://www.chanabraham-changingbritainforgood.com/post/the-met-police-sadiq-khan-and-the-law-that-only-applies-to-some-the-next-steps

The Met Police, Sadiq Khan, and the Law That only Applies to Some - https://www.chanabraham-changingbritainforgood.com/post/the-met-police-sadiq-khan-and-the-law-that-only-applies-to-some

Update: Complaint & FOIA Delay – Why Is the Metropolitan Police Shielding Sadiq Khan’s “From the River to the Sea” Statement? https://www.chanabraham-changingbritainforgood.com/post/update-complaint-foia-delay-why-is-the-metropolitan-police-shielding-sadiq-khan-s-from-the-riv

Metropolitan Police Refuse to Investigate Sadiq Khan’s Defence of “From the River to the Sea” Chant Despite Recording It as a Hate Incident – https://www.chanabraham-changingbritainforgood.com/post/metropolitan-police-refuse-to-investigate-sadiq-khan-s-defence-of-from-the-river-to-the-sea-chant

When the Mayor Says “From the River to the Sea” is Fine – But the Police Won’t Tell Us Why – https://www.chanabraham-changingbritainforgood.com/post/when-the-mayor-says-from-the-river-to-the-sea-is-fine-but-the-police-won-t-tell-us-why

Letter to Metropolitan Police Commissioner: Investigation Into Potential Incitement to Racial Hatred by Mayor of London – https://www.chanabraham-changingbritainforgood.com/post/letter-to-metropolitan-police-commissioner-investigation-into-potential-incitement-to-racial-hatred

Inciting Hatred: Mayor Sadiq Khan’s Defence of the ‘From the River to the Sea’ Chant and Its Role in Fuelling Anti-Semitic Violence in London Protests – https://www.chanabraham-changingbritainforgood.com/post/inciting-hatred-mayor-sadiq-khan-s-defence-of-the-from-the-river-to-the-sea-chant-and-its-role-in

Please share this post and video (which also is on my YouTube channel https://www.youtube.com/

The more people know, the harder it becomes to ignore.

09/06/2026

𝑵𝒐𝒘 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝒊𝒕 𝒊𝒔 𝒄𝒍𝒆𝒂𝒓 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝒇𝒐𝒓𝒎𝒔 𝒐𝒇 𝒔𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒆𝒐𝒕𝒚𝒑𝒊𝒏𝒈, 𝒑𝒓𝒆𝒋𝒖𝒅𝒊𝒄𝒆, 𝒂𝒃𝒖𝒔𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒅𝒊𝒔𝒄𝒓𝒊𝒎𝒊𝒏𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝒂𝒓𝒆 𝒔𝒚𝒔𝒕𝒆𝒎𝒊𝒄 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒊𝒏𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒕𝒖𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒔𝒆𝒅, 𝒂𝒕 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒕𝒂𝒙𝒑𝒂𝒚𝒆𝒓𝒔' 𝒆𝒙𝒑𝒆𝒏𝒔𝒆, 𝒊𝒏 𝑩𝒓𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒊𝒏 𝒂𝒈𝒂𝒊𝒏𝒔𝒕 𝒑𝒆𝒐𝒑𝒍𝒆 𝒘𝒉𝒐 𝒂𝒓𝒆 𝒇𝒂𝒊𝒓, 𝒍𝒊𝒈𝒉𝒕-𝒔𝒌𝒊𝒏𝒏𝒆𝒅, 𝒆𝒔𝒑𝒆𝒄𝒊𝒂𝒍𝒍𝒚 𝒎𝒆𝒏, 𝒏𝒐𝒕𝒂𝒃𝒍𝒚 𝑪𝒉𝒓𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒂𝒏𝒔, 𝒘𝒊𝒍𝒍 𝒕𝒓𝒂𝒊𝒏𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒅𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒍𝒐𝒑𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕 𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒈𝒓𝒂𝒎𝒎𝒆𝒔 𝒓𝒖𝒏 𝒃𝒚 𝒈𝒐𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒏𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕, 𝑪𝒉𝒖𝒓𝒄𝒉 𝒐𝒇 𝑬𝒏𝒈𝒍𝒂𝒏𝒅, 𝑩𝑩𝑪 𝒆𝒕 𝒂𝒍 𝒄𝒂𝒕𝒄𝒉 𝒖𝒑?
I have worked in services to communities for five decades, in London and the Shires; on some of the most troubled housing estates, among some of our nation's most disadvantaged people; always seeking to bring Hope. And succeeded, for my faith as a follower of what The Holy Bible teaches has been foundational and central.

But Britain in 2026 is suffering from a serious sickness: the blindness, deafness and unwillingness of many in power, in authority, to see and hear what is happening in our nation.

People of fair or light skin are experiencing stereotyping, prejudice, abuse and discrimination. Especially men and boys.

Let me make this clear: there is no such thing as "toxic masculinity" (anymore than there is "toxic femininity" or "toxic humanity").
Those who invented this term of abuse against half of the human population, and who use it, are guilty of gross defamation and signficantly harming people's psychological wellbeing.

They, because words matter, have actively contributed to elements of the chaos being experienced in relationships and the way our society has ceased to thrive and flourish in the way The Creator intended.

Men and women equally share the burden of our world's sufferings; and we can share equally in heping to put things right.

This attack on fair and light-skinned people stops in 2026.

The Truth will prevail. These Jericho walls that resist the advance of Hope and Peace must fall.

I believe it.



Advance UK - Cambridgeshire Reform UK

09/06/2026

𝑾𝒉𝒐 𝑾𝒂𝒕𝒄𝒉𝒆𝒔 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑾𝒂𝒕𝒄𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒔? 𝑨 𝑺𝒄𝒂𝒏𝒅𝒂𝒍 𝑯𝒊𝒅𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒊𝒏 𝑷𝒍𝒂𝒊𝒏 𝑺𝒊𝒈𝒉𝒕.
Social housing in England is a £200 billion sector. Millions of the most vulnerable people in this country — elderly, disabled, on low incomes — depend on it for a safe roof over their heads.

The body responsible for regulating it is the Regulator of Social Housing (RSH). Its job is to ensure housing associations are well-governed, financially viable, and actually delivering for tenants.
So what happens when the regulator itself becomes the problem?

Over decades, senior RSH officials and their predecessors have moved through a revolving door between the regulator, large housing associations, and the consultancies that advise them — creating conflicts of interest, apparent favouritism, and a protected network that operates to mutual advantage.

The evidence shows two very different standards of regulation: organisations with serious, documented failings and real tenant harm treated leniently; a high-performing, award-winning local housing organisation — with no tenant harm, top-quartile performance, and consistent clean regulatory judgements — subjected to years of disproportionate scrutiny, a manufactured governance downgrade, unlawful pressure on its board, and the engineered departure of its chief executive.

Within days of that departure, the organisation's entire brand and history were erased overnight.

Internal RSH documents obtained under the Data Protection Act reveal something even more troubling: a pattern of references to the targeted chief executive's faith and ethnic heritage in internal communications — with inspectors actually asking staff "Is [he] a Christian?" and "Do you have to be religious to work here?" These are not regulatory questions. They are evidence of unlawful discrimination.

When this was formally put to the RSH in April 2026 — in a detailed letter with six annexes of evidence — their response was: "We cannot identify any specific matters for consideration."

A formal Stage 1 Complaint has been lodged. A formal referral has been made to West Yorkshire Police, citing potential Misconduct in Public Office, fraud relating to public funds, and conspiracy to obstruct proper scrutiny. Copies have gone to the Independent Office for Police Conduct and the Crown Prosecution Service.

All of this is at a time when public trust in our institutions is dismally low, with increasing exposure of dubious practices by government officials, systemic failures and appalling waste of hard-earned taxpayer monies.

The RSH issue is therefore a matter of profound public interest — about accountability, the integrity of public institutions, and the consequences borne by the most vulnerable when those institutions fail.

This is the first article in a series. The evidence is extensive. The matter is live and ongoing.

Read the full article here 👇 🔗 https://www.chanabraham-changingbritainforgood.com/post/who-watches-the-watchers-the-social-housing-regulator-the-revolving-door-and-a-scandal-hiding-in

If this concerns you — and it should — please share this post and write to your MP asking them to raise it with the Housing, Communities and Local Government Select Committee.

"𝑸𝒖𝒊𝒔 𝒄𝒖𝒔𝒕𝒐𝒅𝒊𝒆𝒕 𝒊𝒑𝒔𝒐𝒔 𝒄𝒖𝒔𝒕𝒐𝒅𝒆𝒔?" — 𝑾𝒉𝒐 𝒘𝒂𝒕𝒄𝒉𝒆𝒔 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒘𝒂𝒕𝒄𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒔?


Advance UK - Cambridgeshire

03/06/2026

𝑫𝒐𝒆𝒔 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑩𝑩𝑪 𝒉𝒂𝒗𝒆 𝒂 𝑪𝒉𝒓𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒂𝒏𝒊𝒕𝒚 𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒃𝒍𝒆𝒎? 𝑶𝒏𝒆 𝒎𝒐𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕, 𝒐𝒏𝒆 𝒊𝒏𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒗𝒊𝒆𝒘, 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒂 𝒑𝒂𝒕𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒏 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑩𝑩𝑪 𝒌𝒆𝒆𝒑𝒔 𝒓𝒆𝒇𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒕𝒐 𝒆𝒙𝒂𝒎𝒊𝒏𝒆
𝗔𝗻 𝟭𝟴-𝘆𝗲𝗮𝗿-𝗼𝗹𝗱 𝗖𝗵𝗿𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗮𝗻 𝗿𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗲𝗿 𝗻𝗮𝗺𝗲𝗱 𝗝𝗲𝘀𝘂𝘀 𝗖𝗵𝗿𝗶𝘀𝘁 𝗮𝘀 𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗴𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗼 𝗼𝗻 𝗕𝗕𝗖 𝗡𝗲𝘄𝘀. 𝗣𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗚𝗲𝗲𝘁𝗮 𝗚𝘂𝗿𝘂-𝗠𝘂𝗿𝘁𝗵𝘆 𝗺𝗮𝗱𝗲 𝗮𝗻 𝗮𝘂𝗱𝗶𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝘀𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱 - 𝗱𝗲𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲𝗱 𝗯𝘆 𝗺𝗮𝗻𝘆 𝘃𝗶𝗲𝘄𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗮𝘀 𝗮 𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗽 𝗶𝗻𝗵𝗮𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻, 𝗮 '𝗵𝗶𝘀𝘀', 𝗶𝗺𝗺𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗹𝘆 𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘄𝗶𝗱𝗲𝘀𝗽𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗿𝘆 𝗼𝗻𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗻𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝗺𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗮 𝗰𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗴𝗲. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗕𝗕𝗖 𝘀𝗮𝘆𝘀 𝘀𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗯𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴. 𝗜 𝘀𝗮𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝘂𝗯𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗾𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲𝗻'𝘁 𝗯𝗲𝗲𝗻 𝗮𝗻𝘀𝘄𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗱 — 𝘀𝗼 𝗜'𝘃𝗲 𝗲𝘀𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗘𝗖𝗨 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗴𝗼 𝘁𝗼 𝗢𝗳𝗰𝗼𝗺 𝗶𝗳 𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗱𝗲𝗱.

DC3 — a MOBO-nominated artist, openly Christian — named Jesus Christ as his greatest inspiration during a live BBC News interview in January 2026. The reaction from the presenter, immediately before she moved on, generated widespread public commentary and was described by Bishop Ceirion Dewar FSHC on GB News as a 'shocking' expression of the BBC's anti-Christian stance.

The BBC closed Stage 1 without addressing whether the broadcast was likely to cause offence under Section 2 of the Ofcom Broadcasting Code, or whether the differential response to religious versus non-religious content raises questions under Section 5 (Due Impartiality). I've now taken it to the BBC's Executive Complaints Unit. If unsatisfied, Ofcom is next.

The BBC is funded by every licence fee payer. It is obliged to treat all faiths with due impartiality. When it doesn't, it must be held to account.

Full article: https://www.chanabraham-changingbritainforgood.com/post/does-the-bbc-have-a-christianity-problem

One moment, one interview, and a pattern the BBC keeps refusing to examine.The InterviewOn the evening of approximately 17 January 2026, BBC News presenter Geeta Guru-Murthy conducted a live interview with DC3 — Daniel Chenjerai — an 18-year-old Christian rapper from Northampton nominated for tw...

02/06/2026

𝑳𝒐𝒏𝒅𝒐𝒏'𝒔 𝑳𝒂𝒃𝒐𝒖𝒓 𝑴𝒂𝒚𝒐𝒓 𝑺𝒂𝒅𝒊𝒒 𝑲𝒉𝒂𝒏 𝒅𝒆𝒇𝒆𝒏𝒅𝒆𝒅 𝒂 𝒄𝒉𝒂𝒏𝒕 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑷𝒓𝒊𝒎𝒆 𝑴𝒊𝒏𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒆𝒓 𝒄𝒂𝒍𝒍𝒆𝒅 𝒂𝒏𝒕𝒊𝒔𝒆𝒎𝒊𝒕𝒊𝒄. 𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑴𝒆𝒕 𝑷𝒐𝒍𝒊𝒄𝒆 𝒓𝒆𝒇𝒖𝒔𝒆𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝒊𝒏𝒗𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒈𝒂𝒕𝒆 — 𝒅𝒆𝒔𝒑𝒊𝒕𝒆 𝒉𝒂𝒗𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒏𝒐 𝒔𝒑𝒆𝒄𝒊𝒇𝒊𝒄 𝒍𝒆𝒈𝒂𝒍 𝒂𝒅𝒗𝒊𝒄𝒆. 𝑰’𝒗𝒆 𝒔𝒑𝒆𝒏𝒕 𝒎𝒐𝒏𝒕𝒉𝒔 𝒑𝒖𝒓𝒔𝒖𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝑭𝑶𝑰𝑨 𝒓𝒆𝒒𝒖𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒔 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒂 𝒇𝒐𝒓𝒎𝒂𝒍 𝒄𝒐𝒎𝒑𝒍𝒂𝒊𝒏𝒕. 𝑵𝒐𝒘 𝒆𝒔𝒄𝒂𝒍𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒕𝒐 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑰𝑪𝑶. 𝑵𝒐 𝒑𝒐𝒍𝒊𝒕𝒊𝒄𝒊𝒂𝒏 𝒊𝒔 𝒂𝒃𝒐𝒗𝒆 𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑳𝒂𝒘.
In October 2025 Sadiq Khan defended the ‘river to the sea’ chant on national TV. The PM called it antisemitic.

The Met Police recorded a hate incident (ref 01/8225922/25) — then declined to investigate without seeking specific legal advice.

My FOIA requests were ignored, delayed, and refused. A conduct complaint is under investigation. I am now at the Information Commissioner’s Office.

The equal and consistent application of the law is not optional.

𝑵𝒐 𝒑𝒐𝒍𝒊𝒕𝒊𝒄𝒊𝒂𝒏 𝒊𝒔 𝒂𝒃𝒐𝒗𝒆 𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑳𝒂𝒘.

Full article and all correspondence at: https://www.chanabraham-changingbritainforgood.com/post/the-met-police-sadiq-khan-and-the-law-that-only-applies-to-some



Advance UK - Cambridgeshire Restore Britain Supporters Restore Britain Reform UK

How It StartedOn 10 October 2025, London Mayor Sadiq Khan gave a live Sky News interview defending the chant 'From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free' as not antisemitic. Prime Minister Keir Starmer publicly contradicted him six days later. I wrote to the Metropolitan Police Commissioner r...

01/06/2026

𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑵𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒂𝒍 𝑻𝒓𝒖𝒔𝒕 𝒃𝒍𝒐𝒄𝒌𝒆𝒅 𝒂 𝑪𝒉𝒓𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒂𝒏 𝒅𝒐𝒄𝒖𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒂𝒓𝒚 𝒂𝒕 𝒂 𝒔𝒊𝒕𝒆 𝒅𝒆𝒇𝒊𝒏𝒆𝒅 𝒃𝒚 𝒊𝒕𝒔 𝑪𝒉𝒓𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒂𝒏 𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒈𝒆. 𝑬𝒏𝒈𝒍𝒊𝒔𝒉 𝑯𝒆𝒓𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒈𝒆 𝒂𝒅𝒎𝒊𝒕𝒕𝒆𝒅 𝒔𝒑𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒅𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒂 '𝒏𝒐𝒏𝒔𝒆𝒏𝒔𝒆 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒐𝒓𝒚' 𝒂𝒃𝒐𝒖𝒕 𝑪𝒉𝒓𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒎𝒂𝒔. 𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑪𝒉𝒂𝒓𝒊𝒕𝒚 𝑪𝒐𝒎𝒎𝒊𝒔𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝒅𝒊𝒅 𝒏𝒐𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒏𝒈. 𝑰'𝒎 𝒇𝒊𝒈𝒉𝒕𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒃𝒂𝒄𝒌.
St Cuthbert's Cave is one of the most significant sites in early British Christianity. The National Trust refused filming there on grounds of the project's religious affiliation — while promoting Ramadan retreats at its other properties. English Heritage admitted disseminating false material about the origins of Christmas, downplaying its Christian foundations.

I raised formal concerns with the Charity Commission about both. In both cases, the Commission declined to act. It has now been told, in no uncertain terms, why that conclusion is wrong — and I have written to the Equality and Human Rights Commission and to Huntingdon MP Ben Obese-Jecty MP.

Britain's Christian heritage is not a minor footnote. It is the foundation of who we are. When heritage charities treat it as a problem to be managed or refused, that demands scrutiny.

Full article and correspondence: https://www.chanabraham-changingbritainforgood.com/post/when-heritage-charities-forget-whose-heritage-it-is



Ben Obese-Jecty MP

The National Trust, English Heritage, and a Charity Commission that Won't Act: A Story of Differential Treatment and Regulatory FailureTwo Charities, One PatternIn the past twelve months, two of Britain's most prominent and heavily subsidised heritage charities have demonstrated, through their actio...