https://www.facebook.com/1023595284178682/

Saint John Civic Watchdog, Saint John, NB (2026)

06/12/2026

The Best Way to Stop Speed Demons

Imagine if Saint John Common Council commissioned a study to determine if water is really wet. Crazy, right? Well, they are doing something pretty close to that when it comes to the reckless drivers on our streets. Let me explain.

Picture this. Your kitchen is flooding because a pipe has burst. Instead of turning off the water valve, you call a family meeting to discuss the budget and then hire an outside consultant to draft a "business case study" to determine if you should stop the leak at the source or just buy a mop. And maybe, along the way, try to determine if water is, in fact, wet.

That is exactly how local government is treating the pandemic of lawless driving on the streets of Saint John.

While our neighbourhoods are treated like a testing ground for temporary rubber mats and asphalt speed cushions, City Hall throws down these plastic band-aids, watches drivers aggressively swerve around them or blast down the next parallel street, and calls it a day.

Make no mistake: we have a massive speeding problem in Saint John. But it persists because we have an infrastructure designed to ignore it—an enforcement problem. Drivers behave recklessly because they know with absolute certainty that nobody is watching. And instead of fixing the root cause, our provincial and municipal governments are engaged in a synchronized performance of bureaucratic foot-dragging.

Let’s call a spade a spade: Saint John doesn’t have a dedicated, aggressive traffic police branch anymore because it is a massive financial loser for the city. Under the current provincial rules, when a Saint John Police officer writes a speeding ticket, the city pays for that officer's salary, car, and fuel—but the province pockets the ticket revenue.

The provincial government claims it is "currently reviewing" a shared-revenue model to return a portion of that fine money to municipalities.

Reviewing what, exactly?

New Brunswick used to have this exact model before the province axed it to plug its own budget holes. The data isn't missing. The math hasn't changed. "Reviewing" an old policy that worked is simply code for: "We like keeping your money, and we’re going to stall as long as possible."

Meanwhile, Saint John City Hall has found its own way to pass the buck. Instead of forcefully lobbying Fredericton to return our share of fine revenues or demanding the immediate deployment of automated enforcement, Council has kicked the issue down the road. They handed the file over to the Fundy Regional Service Commission to conduct yet another "business case study." It is classic bureaucratic theater—spending time and tax dollars to debate a fact the rest of the world settled decades ago. This isn't a legitimate search for answers; it is a needless delay designed to bury a critical safety issue in committee paperwork, so politicians don't have to make a hard decision.

While our politicians study the obvious, cities around the world have already deployed the absolute #1 weapon against lawless driving: Point-to-Point (P2P) Average Speed Cameras.

This isn't the old-school photo radar that catches you at a single intersection. P2P technology is designed to control entire neighbourhoods and commuter drag strips. Here’s how it works:

1. The Entry Camera (Point A): When a car turns onto a known speeding corridor or enters a critical zone (like a school district or a residential cut-through), an automated camera logs the license plate and the exact millisecond.
2. The Exit Camera (Point B): A few blocks later, a second camera logs the plate again.
3. The Math: A computer instantly calculates the exact time it takes to travel that distance. If the speed limit is 50 km/h, it should take a vehicle exactly 60 seconds to travel that stretch of road. If a driver blasts through at 80 km/h, they’ll hit the exit camera in 35 seconds.

It eliminates the "Kangaroo Driving" trick where motorists slam on their brakes for a visible camera or a speed bump, only to hit the gas immediately afterward. With P2P, you can’t beat the clock. If you speed anywhere along that corridor, a ticket is automatically printed and mailed to your house.

This isn't an experiment. When P2P average speed corridors were introduced in urban zones across the UK and Australia, the results were immediate and staggering:

• 99% Compliance: Driver compliance with the posted speed limit shot up to nearly 100%.
• A 90% Drop in Recklessness: Extreme speeding (drivers going more than 15 km/h over the limit) completely evaporated.
• An 80% Reduction in Fatalities: Severe, life-altering crashes inside those zones plummeted.

It strips away the gambler's mentality. Drivers stop speeding because the system removes the element of chance; they know they will be caught every single time.

We don't need a camera on every street corner, and we don't need a regional committee to tell us where the danger is.

Saint John needs to establish Critical Speed Zones on our most dangerous arterial roads and residential shortcuts, back them up with P2P average speed corridors, and demand that 100% of the revenue generated by those cameras be legally "ring-fenced" back into our municipal traffic safety budget to fund real, human police enforcement.

But doing that requires our elected officials to stop playing nice with the province, stop hiding behind regional service commissions, and actually fight for the safety of our neighbourhoods.

What do you think? Will this council do that? Or will it continue to put Band-Aids on an open wound?

06/10/2026

Pulling the wool over people's eyes

There is an old expression for what the City of Saint John is doing once again in its latest traffic calming announcement: Pulling the wool over people’s eyes.

This week, the city proudly announced the installation of temporary rubber speed cushions on Mount Pleasant Avenue East so officials can “measure their effectiveness” before eventually committing to permanent asphalt ‘speed bumps’ in that location.

At first glance, the press release sounds responsible enough. Careful. Scientific. Data-driven.

Then come the numbers.

The city claims speed cushions reduce speeds by an average of nine kilometres per hour and reduce the “risk” of collisions by 28 percent.

Bu****it!

That is the moment the public relations performance begins.

Because the average resident reading that statement naturally assumes those numbers come from real-world results here in Saint John — fewer crashes, fewer injuries, safer roads.

But they do not.

That “28 percent reduction” is not measured in actual collisions on Mount Pleasant Avenue East. It is not evidence gathered from Saint John crash reports. There is no proof that dangerous driving has meaningfully declined in neighbourhoods across the city.

It is the output of a theoretical traffic-engineering equation known as Nilsson’s Power Model.

Most residents have never heard of it. City officials are counting on that.

Nilsson’s Power Model is a mathematical formula used by traffic engineers to estimate how changes in average speed may affect collision probability. In simple terms, the city takes a temporary speed reduction measurement, plugs it into the formula, and out comes a percentage that sounds impressively precise.

Then that number gets handed to the public as though it reflects reality on Saint John streets.

This is where the wool gets pulled firmly over the public’s eyes.

Because anyone who actually drives these roads understands the obvious flaw immediately.

Drivers slow down for the speed cushion for a few seconds because they have to. Then they simply accelerate again.

That does not automatically mean the true average driving speed across the roadway has significantly changed. It means people briefly touched the brakes to avoid damaging their suspension.

Yet the city presents this mathematical modelling exercise as though it were a proven public safety achievement.

And this is what frustrates so many residents: the sense that officials believe ordinary people will simply nod along at the sight of percentages, formulas, and carefully polished statistics.

Dazzle them with numbers.
Make the program sound scientific.
Hope nobody asks hard questions.

But people are asking questions now.

Especially after reading the most revealing statistic in the entire press release: traffic calming requests have increased by more than 400 percent over the last five years.

Think carefully about what that actually means.

The city presents that number as justification for expanding traffic calming measures.

In reality, it is an indictment.

A four-hundred-percent increase in residents demanding protection from dangerous traffic is not evidence of a successful transportation policy. It is evidence of a problem that has spiraled badly enough that people no longer feel safe on their own streets.

That statistic does not make the city look competent.

It makes the city look reactive.

Reactive after years of weak traffic enforcement.
Reactive after years of normalizing dangerous driving behaviour.
Reactive after years of choosing cheaper political optics over sustained public safety measures.

Residents did not suddenly become obsessed with traffic calming devices. They have become frustrated and alarmed after watching speeding, aggressive driving, and reckless behaviour become increasingly common while meaningful enforcement faded into the background because successive city councils refused to prioritize adequate funding and support for traffic law enforcement.

And now, after allowing the problem to grow for years, the city is attempting to manage public perception with pilot projects, temporary rubber cushions, and statistical claims built on theoretical models most people have never even heard of.

But residents are no longer simply accepting the sales pitch.

Because the lived reality on Saint John roads tells a very different story from the one being described in City Hall press releases.

People trust what they see with their own eyes.

And what they see is a city still trying to manage appearances instead of confronting the deeper reasons this crisis was allowed to grow in the first place.

06/08/2026

Finally, some good news for the north end.

The Port City Pirates Baseball Association and the Friends of St. Peter’s Baseball Field have been awarded $148,000 from the Jays Care Foundation "Field of Dreams" program.

The funding will support Phase One of the St. Peter’s Ballfield Project, an initiative to revitalize the historic, decommissioned ballfield located in the heart of the Old North End.

The Friends of St. Peter’s and the City of Saint John are working together to restore this important community space.

It's a good time to share your old memories of the old St. Peter's ballfield.

05/31/2026

Shane Bouzanne advocates for FULL accessibility for the physically disabled in Saint John.

05/31/2026

The Illusion of Inclusion

Our newly elected city council will get down to work right after being sworn in on Monday night by continuing a long-standing pattern of putting people last. Literally.

After dealing with the Charlotte Street infrastructure project and some sewer work, the Mayor will read a proclamation declaring National AccessAbility / Disability Awareness Week, in which the politicians promise to “assist citizens with disabilities to participate FULLY in our community.” Unfortunately, it’s nothing more than empty words printed on a gold-stamped scroll.

Does anyone remember former Mayor Don Darling reading the same proclamation? (They do it every year at this time). A few days later, he held his first Budgets and Beer forum in a building inaccessible to people with physical disabilities.

The feel-good words that will be read into the record at the tail end of the council session stand in stark, bitter contrast to the city’s priorities. To date, it has refused to make the Saint John Ability Advisory Committee a bona fide council committee, preferring instead to leave it on the periphery of real power. It provides some administrative support, but that’s it.

The Outsource Model vs. Real Power

This structural failure happens because Saint John chooses to treat accessibility as an outsourced, volunteer hobby rather than a core function of local government.

In Ontario, municipalities don’t treat accessibility as a peripheral, arms-length volunteer group. Under provincial frameworks like the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act, cities are legally mandated to bring these bodies directly under the municipal wing as formal, statutory City Committees reporting directly to administrative staff. Leaving accessibility to an outside voluntary body allows City Hall to passively nod along to recommendations while absorbing zero structural responsibility. By bringing the committee under its official wing, the city would finally be forced to treat disability rights as a statutory obligation rather than a charitable afterthought.

The deep chasm between these two systems isn't just academic—it has a profound impact on real lives right here in Saint John. Take the case of Shane Bouzanne, who touches on his experience in the accompanying video.

Shane has a spinal cord condition that affects his mobility. He spent 7 years in St. Catharines, Ontario, where he was an active member of that city’s official, mandated Accessibility Advisory Committee, before returning to his birth city four years ago. Here, instead of finding a real seat at the table, he has been completely shut out of the system. Stripped of any real authority, the local volunteer group that poses as the city’s ‘official’ advisory committee relies entirely on the goodwill of council, which results in a placating of politicians by "not demanding too much." Because of this, Shane says he is viewed as a "troublemaker" whose outspoken advocacy rubs the current structure the wrong way for rocking the boat and asking for real independence.

But for advocates like Shane, being "FULLY" included shouldn't mean being quietly swept aside because his outspokenness makes someone uncomfortable. True accessibility means giving the people who live this reality a real seat at a real table with real power.

Instead, ensuring Saint John is a fully inclusive city is viewed as a luxury—something only worth pursuing when senior governments write a cheque for transit enhancements, or when there is leftover political will. When local business owners need capital funding to retrofit old, difficult heritage spaces with things like recessed power doors, interior lifts, and structural entry modifications, they are left to fend for themselves. Yet, when it comes to funding security cameras and municipal resilience grants, the city recognizes the urgency and finds the cash.

True inclusivity cannot be treated as a secondary budget item. This is why Saint John needs to completely dismantle the current toothless setup and bring the Ability Advisory Committee under its official municipal wing as a formal, statutory council committee.

We are officially challenging any member of this new council to step up and introduce a formal Notice of Motion to make that happen. Let’s see which councillor has the backbone to put a real motion on the floor, and let’s see just how committed this council is to the words they spout in the proclamation. Are they hypocrites or are they leaders? Are they truly committed to assisting citizens with disabilities to participate FULLY in our community? Or is their gold-stamped proclamation exactly what the agenda shows it to be: a late-night afterthought?

05/29/2026

The Curtain Falls

The rumors circulating through the ranks for weeks are now official: Saint John Police Chief Robert Bruce is handing in his badge this July, walking away three years before his contract extension was set to expire. For many within the force and across the community, the overriding emotion isn't shock—it’s relief.

True to form, Chief Bruce didn’t exit quietly. In his official statement, he took parting shots at the department, citing "systematic resistance to change" and a "restrictive collective agreement" as his primary hurdles. It’s a familiar narrative from his five-year tenure: framing himself as the lone modernizer thwarted by a stubborn rank-and-file. But a critical, honest look at his track record suggests the resistance wasn't to modernizing; it was to his leadership style.

Let’s look at the facts:

• The Complaints: Last year, nine separate officers filed formal conduct and harassment complaints against Bruce. While the Police Commission ultimately dismissed most of them, an independent investigator did confirm that Bruce made "inappropriate" comments and gestures. Eight of those officers are currently fighting that dismissal in court via a judicial review.

• The Legacy: His tenure was marked by severe instability at the top, characterized by constant turnover in senior leadership and a Deputy Chief position left vacant for long stretches.
The long-vacant Deputy Chief seat was finally filled just two weeks ago with the appointment of Neal Fowler. While some wonder whether the timing suggests Fowler was part of a hand-picked succession plan by the outgoing Chief, the reality on the ground tells a different story.

Unlike the leadership friction of the last few years, Fowler is a 22-year veteran of the local force who came up through the ranks and commands genuine respect from front-line officers. Securing a respected, local leader as Deputy Chief may well have been the ultimate compromise—allowing the Police Commission to stabilize the force with a leader the ranks trust, while giving Bruce a solid leadership team to point to as he negotiated his early retirement package.

With Bruce departing, the search for a permanent new Police Chief must now begin. However, internal rumors suggest Bruce isn't planning to stay completely out of the process, allegedly demanding a say in who his permanent replacement will be before he officially walks out the door in July. The thought of an outgoing chief with this kind of baggage influencing the future selection is raising eyebrows.

The atmosphere at police headquarters right now brings to mind a famous corporate shakeup at a major international news network years ago. A highly disruptive, disliked manager was finally let go after years of internal friction. The toxic cloud lifted so fast that staff members were overheard singing "The Wicked Witch is Dead" in the hallways.

Public service requires command, but it also requires mutual respect. When a leader spends his final days blaming a "toxic workplace" that an independent investigator tied right back to his own behavior, his departure isn't a loss; it is the best possible outcome for Saint John.

This looming transition lands right on the lap of the incoming City Council as they get ready to be sworn in this Monday, June 1. But anyone expecting a radical shift in how the city handles this crisis (or anything else) should temper their expectations. Despite the recent election, this is largely the "same old, same old" council. Mayor Donna Reardon is back for a second term, flanked by several re-elected incumbents and the return of David Merrithew, who likes to be known as fiscally responsible but is widely seen as being largely responsible for the deep cuts in city services. There are some new faces on the council, but a couple are almost certainly there because of support from the old guard.

This entrenched table now has to deal with the previous council’s recommendations on how to handle the Police Commission, based on the independent governance report they received before the vote. That report made it clear the Commission has been "under-governing" and failing to hold leadership accountable.

If this largely unchanged council expects to fix a broken police governance model, they can't just coast through another term. They are inheriting a mess, and with the outgoing Chief allegedly trying to pull strings on his way out, the community will be watching to see if this council has the spine to force real accountability.

05/25/2026

Good News for Vulnerable Youth, But the Same Old Political Stagecraft

Why is it that politicians always need a pat on the back when it comes to handing out tax dollars? It’s like a child hinting for a compliment just for doing their basic chores—except they are spending our money, not theirs.

Case in point: the latest announcement of government funding for Mitchener Village on Thornbrough Street. Nobody is criticizing that. The project is necessary. Providing 9 supportive housing units for vulnerable youth aged 19–25 who are at risk of homelessness is an incredibly valuable investment. The Centre for Youth Care Inc. and the community donors who raised over a million dollars deserve all the credit in the world.

But look at the photo posted by Mayor Donna Reardon, and the focus immediately shifts from public service to pure ego. Before she is even sworn in for her second term, she and a couple of other returning councillors are already lined up for the cameras. And of course, Wayne Long, like Donald Trump, seems to have an insatiable need to always be front and center, hogging the spotlight anytime there's a camera around.

What makes it particularly glaring is that several people in that lineup, including the Mayor, publicly identify with the Christian faith. If they are going to lean into those values, they might want to look at the explicit warning given in the Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 6:1–4) regarding this exact behavior:

"Be careful not to practice your righteousness in front of others to be seen by them. If you do, you will have no reward from your Father in heaven. So, when you give to the needy, do not announce it with trumpets, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and on the streets, to be honored by others. Truly, I tell you, they have received their reward in full. But when you give to the needy, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, so that your giving may be in secret. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you."

Yet, here they are, blowing the political trumpets for a photo op.

Surely, we can celebrate a major win for our community's youth without being subjected to this kind of political posturing. The project is great; the endless need for politicians to use such announcements to promote themselves is getting very tiring.

05/24/2026

Should Amalgamation Be Back on the Table?

On Monday, Donna Reardon will officially be sworn in for her second term as Mayor of Saint John. She is stepping back into the chair at a historic turning point. As we laid out earlier, Saint John is sitting on a $545 million infrastructure maintenance backlog. Our roads, pipes, and public buildings are rotting $14 million faster every single year than we can afford to fix them.

The math is broken. And some say there is only one realistic, structural way to fix it: Amalgamation.

If this debate is going to happen, leadership from the Mayor's office will be critical. To get Fredericton’s attention, she would need to actively open a dialogue with the province regarding a metropolitan merger with the Kennebecasis Valley (Rothesay and Quispamsis) and Grand Bay-Westfield. But is a forced merger the right path, or is it a flashpoint for regional division?

The Pro-Amalgamation Case: Efficiency and Shared Costs

Proponents of amalgamation argue that it is the only way to reflect how our region actually works. Every morning, thousands of commuters drive on Saint John roads, rely on its emergency services, benefit from its industrial tax base, and enjoy its uptown culture. Then, at 5:00 PM, they return home to the suburbs.

Advocates point out that this leaves a smaller, economically strained inner-city population to pay the bill for maintaining the core infrastructure that serves the entire region. From this perspective, broadening the tax base ensures that everyone who uses regional infrastructure helps pay for it.
Furthermore, proponents argue that consolidating five separate administrations—paying for five separate Chief Administrative Officers, five legal teams, five CFOs, and five duplication-heavy bureaucracies to govern a single regional population of just 144,000 people—is an inefficient use of taxpayer money. Merging them, they say, would unlock operational savings and give the region massive bargaining power when fighting for federal and provincial infrastructure cash.

The Decades-Old Debate

This isn't a new conversation. Back in January 2018, when Saint John Common Council voted on a formal motion to ask the province to investigate amalgamation, Donna Reardon (then a city councillor) hesitated, noting she would need to see a "firm business case" and feared the city absorbing extra debt if the transition wasn't managed properly.
But advocates point to three decades of studies sitting on shelves at City Hall:

• The 1997 Cormier Report explicitly stated that leaving Saint John isolated from its suburbs made no long-term economic sense.

• The 2008 Finn Report declared our fragmented local governance completely "unsustainable" and recommended bringing the entire regional footprint under a single coordinated metropolitan authority.

• The 2020 Ernst & Young Audit confirmed that traditional cost-cutting "crutches" can no longer save the city and called for "transformative structural changes"—with regional service delivery and tax reform at the top of the list.

The Suburban Perspective: Autonomy and Identity

Because municipal governance is a zero-sum game, the suburban towns view these arguments through a very different lens. For residents of Rothesay, Quispamsis, and Grand Bay-Westfield, the push for amalgamation often looks less like "regional efficiency" and more like a financial bailout for Saint John.

Suburban opponents have valid questions that deserve answers:

• Why should well-managed towns with stable tax rates risk absorbing a share of Saint John’s half-billion-dollar infrastructure deficit?

• Would a mega-city council drown out the distinct local identities, community standards, and specific policing/recreation preferences of the suburban communities?

• Can a single, massive bureaucracy actually deliver services more efficiently, or does it just add more red tape?

Because municipalities are "creatures of the province," only the provincial government has the legislative authority to compel change. If Mayor Reardon chooses to press Premier Susan Holt and local MLAs on regional reform, it will spark a fierce debate.

Let’s Open the Floor

The era of pretending our communities are completely isolated from one another is over. We share one economy, one job market, and one regional future. But how we navigate that future is entirely up for debate, and how Mayor Reardon deals with it could define her legacy.

We want to know what you think, regardless of which side of the municipal boundary you live on.

• For suburban residents: What are your primary concerns about amalgamation? Is there any version of regional cooperation that would make sense to you?

• For Saint John residents: Do you see a forced merger as the only viable path forward, or are there alternative ways to address the infrastructure backlog?

The comment section is open. Let’s keep the conversation respectful, focused on the data, and aimed at what is genuinely best for southern New Brunswick.

05/23/2026

The Property Tax Illusion

When Harry Houdini performed in Saint John early in the 20th century, newspapers raved that “the tricks he presents excel any ever seen here before.” Alas, that can no longer be said, for today’s politicians have shown conclusively that they are the real masters of illusion.

During the recent election campaign, you will have noticed that candidates hoping to return to the City Hall stage for another four years tried to take a bow for cutting your property taxes. But when you compare us to our neighbours, these so-called "historic cuts" are just an illusion designed to make you think they are doing their part to make your life more affordable.

The Reality Check

Let’s look at the bottom line for an average Saint John home, which is currently assessed at $386,482.If you took that same home and placed it in our sister cities, the difference is stark:

• In Moncton: The annual tax bill is roughly 11% lower, saving a homeowner nearly $650 a year.

• In Fredericton: The annual tax bill is roughly 15% lower, saving a homeowner over $850 a year.

Politicians boast about "cutting" the tax rate, but the reality is that sky-high property assessments have eaten up those savings anyway. Even with the cuts, the average Saint John homeowner is paying significantly more in real cash to City Hall today than they were five years ago.

And let’s be clear about where that money went. In the most recent budget, the city handed out $800,000 in tax "relief." That is $800,000 that could have been used to fill potholes, repair water mains, repair broken-down fire trucks, or start paying down our massive infrastructure debt. Instead, it was sliced up and distributed as a fraction of a percentage point to make the politicians look good to voters.

Houdini always ensured he was paid well for his performances. He knew the value of his own craft. But our politicians are performing in reverse: they are handing you a pittance to keep you focused on your own pockets while the powerful industrialists, who do the most damage to our city's infrastructure, continue to hide behind archaic tax loopholes. They aren't just doing magic; they are essentially paying the audience to look the other way.

Why Cutting Taxes is Irresponsible

Here is the hard truth that local politicians won't say: We shouldn't be cutting taxes at all. We have a massive $545 million infrastructure deficit. Our roads, pipes, and public buildings are rotting $14 million faster every single year than we can afford to fix them. It is mathematically impossible to have a city "rotting beneath our feet" and pretend that a fractional rate cut is good policy.

To recognize just how small this "relief" is, look at the most recent cut. For the average homeowner, the savings amount to about $58 per year. At the current price of a Big Mac, that is just enough to buy about seven burgers a year—roughly one Big Mac every seven weeks.

The Provincial Review: The Next Act

The provincial government is currently reviewing the property tax system, aiming for a new structure by 2027. Some will tell you that we should sit back and wait for it to hand down a “solution”. Fair enough. But in the meantime, the new council must stop the charade. We should not be cutting a single cent from the tax revenue stream until the provincial government completes its tax structure review. Any further "cuts" while we sit on a $545 million infrastructure deficit is not a service to taxpayers; it’s an act of fiscal irresponsibility.

Our re-elected Mayor and new council are being sworn in on Monday. We don't need an illusionist to dazzle us with cheap tricks while the stage collapses; we need a leader who will finally bring the curtain down, expose the real swindle behind our tax system, and get to work fixing this city for real—not just for show. They need to stop the magic tricks and face reality. The audience has seen enough. We don’t need a repeat performance.

Saint John Civic Watchdog

06/12/2026

06/10/2026

06/08/2026

05/31/2026

05/31/2026

05/29/2026

05/25/2026

05/24/2026

05/23/2026

Address

Website

Alerts

Shortcuts

Share

Category