Save Georgian Bay

Save Georgian Bay The clock is ticking! TC Energy threatens Georgian Bay & the
Escarpment. Every letter counts.

Click the link to act! 🌊📝

https://savegeorgianbay.ca/letter/

06/02/2026

THESE ARE THE SUMMARY OF ISSUES FOR THE - Ontario Pumped Storage Hydropower Project

The Summary of Issues outlines the key issues that the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada (IAAC) considers relevant for the federal impact assessment process for the Ontario Pumped Storage Hydropower Project (the project), as proposed by TC Energy (the Proponent). The proponent's response to the Summary of Issues will support decision-making by IAAC on whether an impact assessment is required under section 16 of the Impact Assessment Act. If an impact assessment is required, the key issues outlined below and the proponent's response will inform the scope of the impact assessment, and the development of the Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines and plans, as appropriate.

IAAC was informed by input from federal and provincial authorities, Indigenous groups, and the public received to date on the proponent's Summary of the Initial Project Description. The proponent is encouraged to review all submissions on the Canadian Impact Assessment Registry Internet site for the project (Reference Number 89803).

The proponent is required to submit a response that describes how it intends to address the key issues identified below as part of the development of its project. A high-level description is sufficient. Where relevant, the proponent is encouraged to identify if the key issues will be addressed through existing legislative and regulatory frameworks (i.e. legislation or regulation), by proponent commitments to best practices, policies or standards, or both.

Key Issues
Fish and Fish Habitat
Concerns about effects to fish and fish habitat, including spawning habitat, from in-water construction and operation of the inlet/outlet structure, including sedimentation, turbidity, and resuspension of materials, changes to water quality, and loss or alteration of habitat resulting from lakebed disruption and shoreline modification.
Concerns regarding increased risk of fish mortality or injury through entrainment and impingement, blasting, and changes to hydrodynamic conditions such as water circulation, temperature, and stratification in Georgian Bay.
Change to the Environment on Federal Lands
Concerns regarding effects to species at risk, including increased mortality risk and loss or alteration of species at risk habitat, resulting in potential adverse effects on the survival and recovery of listed species.
Concerns regarding changes to terrain stability resulting in potential risks of slope failure, erosion, and associated effects on federal lands.
Concerns regarding bedrock excavation causing metal leaching and acid rock drainage, resulting in potential changes to groundwater, and surface water quality on federal lands.
Concerns regarding changes to groundwater flow and levels, resulting in potential effects on groundwater–surface water interactions and environmental conditions on federal lands.
Concerns regarding changes in air quality from construction activities, resulting in potential adverse effects on human health on federal lands.
Concerns regarding increased noise and vibration levels from construction activities on federal lands.
Structures, Sites, or Things of Historical, Archaeological, Paleontological, or Architectural Significance to Indigenous Peoples
Concern about disturbance or loss of heritage resources and uncertainty regarding identification, protection, and management of culturally significant sites.
Indigenous Peoples Physical and Cultural Heritage
Concern about the impact of the project on the relationship with the land, including spiritual and cultural impacts
Indigenous Current Use of Lands and Resources for Traditional Purposes
Concerns about effects to fishing, navigation, and harvesting, due to changes in access in Georgian Bay, availability, and quality of lands and resources.
Concerns about cumulative effects of existing restrictions on access to the 4th Canadian Division Training Centre in combination with this project, particularly to the current use of lands and resources for traditional purposes.
Indigenous Peoples' Health, Social, and Economic Conditions
Concerns regarding effects to Indigenous health from environmental changes affecting water quality, resource quality and availability, and access to clean water and country foods.
Concerns about effects to social and economic conditions from limiting access to lands and resources used for traditional purposes, affecting harvesting activities and associated livelihoods, and potentially undermining cultural continuity and community well-being.
Concerns regarding changes to surface water quality resulting in potential effects to drinking water for Indigenous communities and associated impacts on health and well-being.
Indigenous Peoples Rights
Concern about impacts to the exercise of rights of Indigenous Peoples, resulting from effects on lands, waters, and resources used for traditional purposes.
Community Well-Being and Infrastructure
Concerns regarding influx of construction workers causing increased demand for housing, local services, and infrastructure, leading to more pressures on community capacity and well-being on federal lands and surrounding areas.
Concerns regarding pre-existing contamination, and the potential for soil disturbance, overburden handling, stormwater runoff, and construction activities to cause changes to water quality in drinking water wells adjacent to the project.
Accidents and Malfunctions
Concern about infrastructure malfunctions, accidents and failures, such as the upper ring dam, reservoir, conveyance systems, and spillways.
Appendix – Other Comments, Advice, and Recommendations
The following list provides other comments, advice, and recommendations for information purposes only. The proponent is encouraged to consult the Canadian Impact Assessment Registry Internet site for the project (Reference Number 89803) to review the original comments.

Other Comments
Alternatives to Consider
Noted importance of considering alternative energy storage technologies and alternative means of carrying out the project, including whether alternative approaches could reduce environmental and social effects.
Indigenous and Stakeholder Consultation and Engagement
Concerns regarding the adequacy, transparency, and effectiveness of engagement activities with Indigenous groups and stakeholders, including information sharing and the extent to which input is meaningfully incorporated into planning and decision-making.
Permitting and Authorizations Recommendations
Transport Canada be consulted to ensure compliance with the Canadian Navigable Waters Act, particularly on the necessary permits and authorizations.
Fisheries and Oceans Canada be consulted to ensure compliance with the Fisheries Act and the Species at Risk Act, particularly with regard to the necessary permits and authorizations.
Environment and Climate Change Canada be consulted to ensure compliance with the Migratory Birds Convention Act, 1994 and the Migratory Birds Regulations, 2022 and the Species at Risk Act, particularly with regard to the necessary permits and authorizations.
Natural Resources Canada be consulted to ensure compliance with the Explosives Act, particularly with regard to the necessary permits and authorizations.
Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada be consulted to ensure compliance with the Dominion Water Power Act, particularly with regard to the necessary permits and authorizations.
Department of National Defence be consulted to ensure that information necessary to enable a ministerial decision under the National Defence Act is provided.
Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Climate Change and Parks be consulted to confirm applicable provincial approval requirements under the Environmental Protection Act, Ontario Water Resources Act, and Species Conservation Act, 2025.
Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources be consulted to ensure compliance with the Public Lands Act and the Environmental Assessment Act, 1990.
"Page details"

This year there will be 2 barges in the bay from early June to late September drilling into the pristine waters of Georg...
06/01/2026

This year there will be 2 barges in the bay from early June to late September drilling into the pristine waters of Georgian Bay ....Its time to contact the local politicians and TCE at [email protected] to express your objection to this project.

05/28/2026

PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT MATTERS...READ IT IN THE INDEPENDENT AND GIVE IT A THUMBS UP!!

Public Engagement Matters
May 28, 2026

Dear Editor,

In recent months, those concerned about the proposed Ontario Pumped Storage Project at the 4th Canadian Division Training Centre have seen encouraging signs.

More than 400 submissions were made to the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada (IAAC), reflecting widespread concern from residents, municipalities, and environmental organizations across the Georgian Bay region. More recently, the Department of National Defence (DND) itself has raised serious questions about the compatibility of the project with its military operations at the Meaford base.

These developments are important. They demonstrate that public engagement matters and that informed, evidence-based concerns are being heard.

But they should not be mistaken for a final outcome.

TC Energy has not withdrawn its proposal. The project remains active within the federal review process. In April, IAAC directed the proponent to respond to the many concerns raised during the public comment period. Those responses are now under review, and no final decision has been made.

In addition to the concerns already raised, the Department of National Defence has identified significant regulatory and operational constraints that would need to be addressed before the project could proceed. These include the presence of federally listed Species at Risk and limitations on the ability to provide compensatory habitat offsetting on DND lands. In its submission, DND notes that it is unable to accommodate additional land use for offsetting outside the project footprint – an issue that may create substantial challenges in meeting federal permitting requirements.

Despite these identified constraints, the project remains active within the federal review process.

There is also a broader context to consider. The project is being positioned, in part, as a climate-related energy storage initiative. In today’s policy environment, projects framed in this way can be advanced as priorities at the provincial or federal level, even in the face of substantial local opposition.

In other words, while meaningful progress has been made, there is no guarantee that this project will be stopped.

If there is one clear lesson from the past several years, it is this: sustained public attention is what drives accountability. The strong response from the community, the positions taken by municipalities, and the scrutiny now reflected in agency and departmental reviews did not happen on their own – they were the result of continued engagement by informed citizens, professionals, community organizations, and municipal governments across the Georgian Bay region, including eight municipalities that have formally raised concerns or opposed the project.

Until the proponent formally abandons this project, continued public engagement remains essential.

Where significant risks remain unresolved, and where even federal authorities have identified fundamental constraints, it is fair to ask whether this project should proceed at all.

Progress is worth acknowledging. But it is not the same as resolution.

The community has brought this conversation to where it stands today. It will take continued attention to ensure it reaches a responsible conclusion.

Sincerely,

Pat Zita, Meaford

It's time to sign our petition.....
05/21/2026

It's time to sign our petition.....

Save Georgian Bay Petition Save Georgian Bay PetitionFill out this form to get your voice counted! SGB Petition Name * First Last * Last Email * Address Address Address Address City City State/Province State/Province Zip/Postal Zip/Postal Country Country I oppose the TC Energy Pumped Storage Project...

It's time to sign our petition....
05/21/2026

It's time to sign our petition....

Save Georgian Bay Petition Save Georgian Bay PetitionFill out this form to get your voice counted! SGB Petition Name * First Last * Last Email * Address Address Address Address City City State/Province State/Province Zip/Postal Zip/Postal Country Country I oppose the TC Energy Pumped Storage Project...

05/20/2026

The first 4 GWh phase of the Canadian developer’s Quinte Energy Storage Centre is expected to be operational in the early 2030s, with subsequent phases targeting 8 GWh to 16 GWh.

05/13/2026

IN CASE YOU DID NOT KNOW - BRUCE "C" has been artificially LINKED TO THE OPS...A TOTAL OF 585 MILLION DOLLARS FOR DEVELOPMENTAL COSTS......

Last week, Ontario Energy Minister Stephen Lecce announced that the province has directed the Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO) to subsidize Bruce Power’s $300 million pre- development budget for a new nuclear station.

That means Ontario electricity consumers are once again being forced to bankroll a high-cost nuclear project that could cost $110 billion.

Address

PO Box 20134 Bayfield North
Barrie, ON
L4M6E9

Telephone

+14165432767

Website

https://polardip.savegeorgianbay.ca/

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Save Georgian Bay posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Organization

Send a message to Save Georgian Bay:

Share