20/05/2026
CAMBRIDGE OR NO CAMBRIDGE?
The Opposition has strongly questioned the government's readiness to roll out the Cambridge-aligned curriculum this year. Concerns over teacher training, textbook distribution, and facility adequacy are valid.
Implementation matters. Even the best ideas can fail if executed poorly.
But we should also not lose sight of the bigger picture. The Prime Minister was right to say that curriculum reform is essential in an era shaped by rapid advances in science, technology, and globalization.
For a small country like Bhutan, developing and constantly updating a world-class national curriculum is an enormous task. It requires specialized curriculum design, teacher training systems, assessment expertise, and continuous revision — all of which are expensive and institutionally demanding.
Cambridge brings much of that together in a globally recognized framework at a relatively affordable cost. It gives students international comparability, mobility, and exposure to higher standards.
That does not mean implementation concerns should be ignored. Teacher preparedness, localization to Bhutanese values and realities, and equitable access across schools will determine whether the reform succeeds.
The debate, therefore, should not simply be “Cambridge or no Cambridge.” Our Opposition must explicitly express their support for the reform while pointing out the areas that need improvement.