17/12/2025
Beyond Childhood focuses on children at risk of crime, with a five-year vision to foster dialogue, generate evidence, and pilot action-oriented innovations.”
Longitudinal Action-Based Research on Children Deprived of Liberty
Implemented by Lawyers for Human Rights and Development (LHRD) with the support of UNICEF under the JURE Programme
This case study documents the reintegration trajectories of two adolescent boys aged 14 and 15 who were institutionalized due to involvement in petty crime and substance use. The longitudinal, action-based research followed their institutional care, education and skills development, psychosocial support, and transition toward reintegration and employability over a three-year period.
# # # Background and Institutional Placement
The first child, aged 15, was an orphan who became involved in petty crimes, including theft, and was institutionalized due to repeated community-level risks and the absence of parental care. The second child, aged 14, was institutionalized due to drug use and associated child protection concerns and was later reintegrated into family-based care under the supervision of his grandmother.
Psychological, family, behavioral, and community assessments conducted by the LHRD project team identified differentiated reintegration pathways. For the orphaned child involved in crime, extended institutional care combined with structured skills training was assessed as necessary prior to community reintegration. For the child with a history of substance use, family-based reintegration was considered appropriate, provided that sustained supervision and continuous psychosocial follow-up were maintained.
Education, Skills Development, and Transition Outcomes
The orphaned child involved in petty crime was placed in a vocational training center specializing in motor mechanism and technical skills. Within the structured training environment, he demonstrated discipline, consistent attendance, and strong practical competence. He successfully obtained a recognized vocational qualification and gained positive standing within the institution. Following the completion of training, he entered employment in the relevant sector.
The child with a history of drug use experienced repeated difficulties in sustaining formal education. Despite these challenges, continuous psychosocial engagement enabled him to sit for the Ordinary Level examination. After reintegration with his grandmother, he remained uncertain about continuing education or securing employment, reflecting ongoing emotional vulnerability and limited confidence in managing adult responsibilities.
Psychological Status and Employment-Related Vulnerabilities
Longitudinal psychological assessments revealed that technical qualification or examination completion did not equate to psychological readiness for employment. Both children experienced difficulty coping with work pressure, authority structures, and unfamiliar social environments. Limited trust in adults and peers reduced their capacity to seek support or express concerns, increasing the risk of misunderstanding, conflict, and secondary victimization within workplaces.
In the case of the child who entered employment, the absence of care, affirmation, and emotional safety within the work environment led to feelings of rejection and distress. This resulted in premature withdrawal from employment. These patterns demonstrate how unresolved trauma, limited emotional regulation, and lack of workplace socialization can undermine otherwise positive skills-based reintegration outcomes.
Research Findings – Gaps Between Training and Employment
The research identified a critical gap between vocational training completion and sustainable employment for children at risk of crime and substance use. Direct transition from training to employment without structured preparation resulted in an inability to manage work-related stress and performance expectations, difficulty understanding workplace ethics, hierarchy, and communication norms, fear and mistrust when conflicts or pressure emerged, and increased vulnerability to exploitation due to limited self-advocacy skills.
For Child A, repeated discontinuation of studies was closely linked to the absence of clear connections between education, career pathways, and real-life work situations. For Child B, expressed willingness to participate in training combined with gradual work exposure highlighted the importance of phased transitions rather than immediate entry into full employment.
Research Recommendation – Pre-Employment Transition Training Model
Based on these findings, the study recommends a one- to four-month individualized pre-employment transition programme functioning as a finishing-school model specifically designed for children at risk of crime. This phase should precede formal employment and integrate employability skills and work ethics, understanding of workplace roles, rules, and expectations, coping strategies for work pressure and conflict, trust-building and communication skills, personal safety and boundary-setting, career guidance linked to actual work environments, and trauma-informed psychological support focused on emotional regulation.
Practice Innovation and Future Action Research
In response to the evidence generated through this longitudinal study, the LHRD project team, with the support of Law and Mind, has designed a practical pre-employment transition training center. The model integrates psychological preparation, career readiness, ethical employment orientation, and gradual exposure to work environments.
The training center is envisioned as a platform for future action-based research, aimed at testing and refining structured transition pathways to reduce employment breakdown, secondary victimization, and reoffending among children at risk.
Written by
Nadee Gunaratne
Research Lead – Longitudinal Action-Based Research on Children Deprived of Liberty (2021–2024)
President – Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom
Director – Towards Responsive / Beyond Childhood International