27/04/2026
We listened to some more very interesting presentations to the parliamentary committee responsible for the e-Mobility bill this morning. So many great points—especially by road safety experts from QUT, Griffith University, and the University of Queensland reminding the committee that there is no evidentiary basis to “crack down” on safe, low-powered, pedal-assist bicycles. Those are very safe transport devices and shouldn’t be conflated with e-scooters, and certainly not with 2-wheeled devices that are more akin to motorcycles.
Chris from Brisbane West BUG explained very succinctly: compliant pedal-assist e-bikes are simply bicycles, and shouldn’t be treated any differently.
Professor Narelle Haworth from QUT stressed that research demonstrates bike riders are in general very law-abiding, but will naturally prioritise their own safety and the safety of others around them ahead of the letter of the law.
In these images of the “CBD to Wynnum Bikeway” (which doesn’t even meet the standards for a footpath), e-bike riders are going make a quick assessment on their safety riding at 25kph on the right with the cars, trucks and other heavy vehicles, and almost always opt for the empty path on the left even though they will be technically breaking the law when they exceed 10kph. Over a thousand people typically navigate this path every day—walking, cycling, and on e-scooters. Yes, people need to be very careful and respectful in their interactions with others because the infrastructure is so poor, but it's very obvious (to anyone who isn't wilfully ignorant) where the real danger lies.
The LNP members of the e-mobility committee and the government have tried to argue that their intent isn’t to force people to ride on dangerous roads, or to give up riding altogether. But if the bill passes in its current form, those will be the only practical lawful options.